User talk:GreatAwk

Welcome!

Hello, GreatAwk, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as First Love: a Historic Gathering of Jesus Music Pioneers, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard. Thank you.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Chzz ► 02:57, 22 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of First Love: a Historic Gathering of Jesus Music Pioneers

The article First Love: a Historic Gathering of Jesus Music Pioneers has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Appears to be a non-notable documentary; I cannot find any independent reliable sources, the only mention seems to be on primary-source websites

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Chzz ► 02:57, 22 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Easter Song

Thanks for the addition of the Easter Song article. I made a number of changes. Most importantly, I moved the citations in-line. Wikipedia style is to use only one space after punctuation. If you copy a rendered page, you'll see that this is the way the page is displayed. --Walter Görlitz (talk) 15:53, 21 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Steve Greisen

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

A tag has been placed on Steve Greisen, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be unambiguous advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item G11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{hangon}} on the top of Steve Greisen and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Noble-savage (talk) 03:05, 1 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Rachel Rachel (band)

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Rachel Rachel (band), and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://tophollywooddirectors.blogspot.com.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 22:46, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Steve Greisen for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Steve Greisen is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steve Greisen until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Calton | Talk 00:55, 21 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]