User talk:Grad Osek

Grad Osek, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Hi Grad Osek! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Rosiestep (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:05, 1 November 2019 (UTC)

Request[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Grad Osek (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am told that I am sock. On the page given to me on my main profile page I see there is no evidence for that and that I am only suspected of it because I edited page other people edited too. I ask to be unblocked so that I can edit further and without problem.

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 11:56, 21 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Grad Osek (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I addressed the problem because I am not person or wiki acount I am told I am on my profile page. Administrator told me to convince so I will try: *I made no damage or disruption, I only use valid source *block is unnecessary bacause *#I have been blocked thinking I am that other person, I am not *#I will not make damage just as I have not so far *#I am making useful contrubition but only on one page so far

Decline reason:

Behavioural and/or technical evidence strongly suggests that this account is a sockpuppet. Simple denial is not considered a sufficient reason to unblock the account. In order to be unblocked, you will need to convince the reviewing administrator that there is a better explanation for this apparent connection than the abuse of multiple accounts. Yunshui ^雲 _水 15:54, 21 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@Yunshui: How can I say to administrator that I am not someone I am told I am, this vandal, everyone keep saying I must convince administrators and no one says how, what tools, what evidence do I need to find and show to prove I am not who you say I am?

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Grad Osek (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am applying again because I read rules to appeal again and still don't understend what I did wrong, except I am told I am a person I am not. 1. My block was incorect because I returned same source as person I am accused of being, and I am not that person, in my edition of page Hs Produkt VHS, it is sourced but some people don't like so they hate and delete and accuse me to be some vandal, person I mention above.

2. People say I might be vandal and vandalize pages, but I only made one edit to page and I am already blocked, I also ckeck and I see there is source for my edit and I did no wrong.

3. They say I must give evidence, only evidence I have are my edits: I add edit to page here with source [[1]] and I even add more source text here [[2]] and I even delete no source text here [[3]]. After all that other person comes in and delete all my work with my source here [[4]] and again here [[5]]. After that I am locked from editing but I only add source to improve this wiki here. I prove my constructive intention so I ask to be unblocked.

Decline reason:

It seems unlikely that a new user would make the same edit as a blocked editor, especially on such an obscure article. To prevent further "I'm not a sock puppet" unblock requests, I've revoked your talk page access. If you still want to appeal this, you can use WP:UTRS. However, you'll have to say something substantially more convincing than "I'm not a sock puppet". For starters, you'll have to explain why you made the same edit as a sock puppet in your first few edits. You should also try to explain why that same exact content got restored by an IP editor on 20 December. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 23:33, 23 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.