User talk:Gorgan almighty/Archives/Archive1

Play nice

Accusing another editor of vandalism within your first twenty-five edits, isn't the best way to start editing here. The security problems with ADS were already covered adequately within the Fork page. And most of your subsequent contributions still stand. Please try to avoid personal attacks. Thank you. AlistairMcMillan 16:06, 28 November 2005 (UTC)

What you are talking about isn't a security problem in NTFS though. The problem is that the forks are hidden by Windows Explorer and all the other applications/tools that come with Windows. It is a fault of those applications that they are so easily exploited and it is so difficult to fix the affected files. It is not a fault in NTFS. That is why it does not belong on the NTFS page. AlistairMcMillan 16:48, 28 November 2005 (UTC)

Greenwich University

I'm sorry our first interaction on the 'pedia had to be a dispute. I appreciated your constructive approach to resolution, especially your adherence to the BOLD, revert, discuss cycle. See you round, Snottygobble | Talk 03:57, 12 December 2005 (UTC)

OK what's up?

You would revert a catneeded? Something's wrong, you call the lack of a category as vandalism. Back to the rule books I would suggest. Read carefullly! OK - sorry I realise my computer somehow (or wiki) jumps me out of my login, and there I was in number mode with no sig. May I apologise in turn! I sometimes get very hotheaded about the amount of catneeded stuff, and advertisement like arts... Vcxlor

No trouble. I posted a reply to the talk page of your IP address, User talk:60.230.229.45.

—gorgan_almighty 14:16, 12 December 2005 (UTC)

I must say I am impressed by your user page! I may even steal! Unofrtunately some of the clues as to my advanced age are a bit off-putting. My 15 year old is addicted to O game, and when I have the time I could sit hitting random article for years!! vcxlor 00:14, 13 December 2005 (UTC) Yeah! Sure beats the silent guys who dont have a single letter on theirs! As long as we aren't taking up too much bandwidth  :) vcxlor 00:49, 14 December 2005 (UTC)

Modest Proposal

I'm not sure why you listed A Modest Proposal for speedy deletion. It's a classic work of satire that's been known for centuries. It most definitely is the origin of the phrase "modest proposal", which is used to describe a deliberately over-the-top parody. DS 18:43, 12 December 2005 (UTC)

Replied on Talk:A Modest Proposal.

—gorgan_almighty 12:14, 13 December 2005 (UTC)

It could well be the most famous peice of classic satire in English and you nominated it for deletion?

Operation Wisła

The source was given on the article's talk page and is added to references, I can also try finding another one, but I'm not sure it will solve the problem. The problem with the anon user is much bigger. She (the anon uses femail gender writing in Polish) has some personal problem with Ukrainians and tries to either add biased information to the article, or remove the information which she doesn't like. She also had with me a very heated discussion on my talk page leaving many comments offending to Ukrainians. She vandalised my user page twice. It seems that the anon uses the same IP number in evenings 217.96.248.99, but the IP numbers (starting with 83) used during working hours change every day. I'll ask admins for blocking at least the 217 one. I do not want to ask for protection of the article, because many people work on it now, and it would prevent the article from developing. Thanks for help!--SylwiaS | talk 16:28, 16 December 2005 (UTC)