User talk:Google6666

Welcome!

Hello, Google6666, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Microsoft connect, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Agent 78787 ^{talk contribs} 22:49, 19 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

WP:ANI[edit]

You have been reported to WP:ANI. See Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Google6666. You'll be blocked soon. M'encarta (talk) 23:24, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please read the guidance above[edit]

Wikipedia has some fairly-well-established guidelines on how to write articles, which you were shown in the welcome note above. Please read these before contributing further so you don't get blocked. Thanks. --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 23:30, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

In response to your feedback[edit]

You have been given sound advice above; try to understand our rules, trying to push things will only get you blocked.

Lectonar (talk) 11:16, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of AirPlay Mirroring[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on AirPlay Mirroring requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. An Illusive Man 22:58, 21 February 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Gatekeeper (apple)[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Gatekeeper (apple) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. GouramiWatcher ^(Gulp) 23:00, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Empty pages[edit]

Please stop creating empty pages. Having an empty page does not help anyone, and they are not stubs, stubs must have enough information to identify the subject. If you would like to add referenced content to these pages, please do so. Otherwise, they will probably deleted per speedy deletion criterion A3. If you have any questions, you can contact me on my talk page. Thanks, "Pepper" @ 23:01, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

February 2012[edit]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. --Bongwarrior (talk) 23:04, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for refusing to follow Wikipedia policy and guidelines, as you did at Microsoft connect. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. SarekOfVulcan (talk) 22:42, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Bear in mind that "indefinite" does not mean "infinite" -- if you can convince a reviewing administrator that you understand what you've been doing wrong and that you won't do it going forward, you could be unblocked within hours. --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 22:43, 23 February 2012 (

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Google6666 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

your reason here The reason why I would like to be unblocked is I was editing pages and the one I got block for but the first block lied and this block does too they never even gave warning that the next time you do it you will get block permanent anyways they shouldn't block your ip they should block your account ok that's why Google6666 (talk) 23:04, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

{this request doesn't really make any sense. Also, please only post one such request at a time. I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Beeblebrox (talk) 00:57, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

The reason why I would like to unblocked is I was editing pages and the one I got block for but the first block lied and this block does too they never even gave warning that the next time you do it you will get block permanent anyways they shouldn't block your ip they should block your account ok that's why

Actually, you were warned, here. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing is pretty clear. I removed the ip unblock request, because it's irrelevant while your main account is blocked.--SarekOfVulcan (talk) 23:16, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

can you please give me one more cance I now know that I carnt please

There's also the implied warning still on this page (Please read these before contributing further so you don't get blocked). —DoRD (talk) 23:23, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

{{unblock | reason=your reason here can you please give me one more chance I now know I am not allowed {{tl|unblock | reason=your reason here

Advice[edit]

I'm sorry, Google6666, but looking at your edit history and the history of broken unblock requests on this page, I can't help but thinking that Wikipedia isn't the right place for you, at least not at this time. I have little doubt that you mean well, but it's just not working out, and perhaps you should spend some time practicing your editing skills somewhere else. From your contributions, I gather that you are interested in Apple products, so this might be a good place to start. Learn how to properly edit a wiki, learn our rules and guidelines, then come back and try again, and you may turn out to be a valuable contributor after all. —DoRD (talk) 01:09, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

February 2012[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Google6666 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

your reason here I understand why I got blocked for its because I kept creating the same page if you unblock me I won't create the same page anymore I won't cause damage to the wiki or anything else I will make a good contributionGoogle6666 (talk) 07:27, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Without meaning to cause offense here, I believe there is a quite serious issue with competence here - wait a few months, edit the wikia given by DoRD above, and then try to appeal your block. — foxj 09:12, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

{{unblock}}

{{unblock}} to {{unblock|reason=your reason here please give me one more chance i wont do it agine i know why i was block and i wont damange other wikies please unblock me or just my ip pleaseGoogle6666 (talk) 13:50, 24 February 2012 (UTC)}}[reply]

{{unblock-un}}

{{unblock|user=google6666|reason=your reason here i know why i was blocked but please unblock me i wont do it aginew i will only edit ones i am alowed and only alowed to create ones 1 once okGoogle6666 (talk) 13:55, 24 February 2012 (UTC)}}[reply]

Like DoRD, I think that your incorrect use of the unblock templates suggests that you do not currently possess the requisite skills to edit here successfully. I have not formally declined your unblock requests; I've left them as a test.

If you can pare it down to one well-formed request, that will be evidence in your favour, and I'll further contemplate unblocking your account.
If you produce more poorly-formed requests, that will be evidence against you, and I will agree that your account should remain blocked for the foreseeable future.

I look forward to your response. —C.Fred (talk) 14:04, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Google6666 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

your reason here The reason why I would like to be unblocked is I was editing a page but I was creating the same page But I said I out stub there becuAse I didn't have the exact information but anyone else who had information could put it there but they didn't understand that so they blocked me for that. They block me and lied they doint even give warning that the next time you do it you will get block permanent anyways they shouldn't block your ip they should block your account ok that's why Please unblock me please I won't doint againeGoogle6666 (talk) 17:09, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I'm sorry, but adding three ill-formed requests and this poor explanation of a request for unblocking show that you are not currently competent enough to edit Wikipedia. Please read the guidelines and come back later (as in, at least several months down the road). —C.Fred (talk) 17:18, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

{{unblock}}

So you admit that you were creating empty pages—which you were specifically warned not to do? (You may reply to this directly below this line, without using an unblock template.) —C.Fred (talk) 17:35, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Well I didn't create a blank page i put some information and text on it and left the rest for any body else who knew any more information

Well I didn't create a blank page i put some information and text on it and left the rest for any body else who knew any more information {{unblock|1=Insert your reason to be unblocked here Well I didn't create a blank page put some information and text on it and left the rest for any body else who knew any more information}}

That's still an empty page. There are other processes to request a page be created on a subject. —C.Fred (talk) 18:23, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

{{unblock|1=Insert your reason to be unblocked here oh ok sorry but please give me 1 more chance I won't do it this time I will request for e pages to be created instead only if I doint know anything ok }}

I'm sorry, but your repeated posting of unblock requests has become disruptive, and I have removed your access to the talkpage. You will have to use https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/unblock-en-l to request unblocking, but I really, really suggest you don't do so for several months. --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 19:06, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Microsoft connect listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Microsoft connect. Since you had some involvement with the Microsoft connect redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Codename Lisa (talk) 16:26, 16 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]