User talk:Golfguy11

Confirm the M if you can, but don't take a picture of a McDonalds sign. Mindys12345 00:21, 7 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Someones word isn't enough, it has to be proved somehow, maybe you could ring the school or something and tell them to upload some images. I need to see the em as an M and the M as a V.Mindys12345 03:55, 7 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have checked the link and it looks pretty good, tell me are you from around that area. Mindys12345 06:40, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Mindys12345 13:00, 8 May 2007 (UTC) I simply copy and paste what other people have on their user pages by clicking edit then copying what thy have on there page but you do not save, you go strait back to you user page, click edit then past, I would preview first before you save though. I have some sneaky tricks that could be played on people as well SHOCKING. Would you like a demonstration later, but I warne you its not for the faint hearted. But you may get a laugh out of it. Mindys12345 00:32, 9 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey

If you are looking for more user boxes and information about them go to Wikipedia:Userboxes. Make sure your edits are neutral in the future. I think you'll enjoy the cracker page it applies.--Wayne Neptune 03:08, 9 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ideas for user page and prac jokes for all to enjoy

Here are some more ideas for your home page

Monrovia High

I have recently noticed that the Monrovia High article has no introdution what so ever, I thought that if you actually go to the school then you would have some idea on what to add. Check out this link for some more ideas. Mindys12345 08:57, 12 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Duarte High School

Hey, do you go to this school, Duarte High School. Is that why your writing this article, if so it might be a good idea to add some more info and maybe even some images. I would like to find out more. Mindys12345 06:09, 10 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Karl (Janitor), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you feel that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. PGWG 16:32, 12 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove speedy deletion tags from articles that you have created yourself, as you did with Karl (Janitor. If you do not believe the article deserves to be deleted, then please place {{hangon}} on the page (please do not remove any existing speedy deletion tag) and make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you.PGWG 16:34, 12 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Empire Lakes Golf Course

A "{{prod}}" template has been added to the article Empire Lakes Golf Course, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. The Sunshine Man 17:33, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Rickie Fowler

A tag has been placed on Rickie Fowler, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Schutz 22:50, 8 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove speedy deletion tags from articles that you have created yourself, as you did with Rickie Fowler. If you do not believe the article should be deleted, then please place {{hangon}} on the page (please do not remove any existing speedy deletion tag) and make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. Schutz 05:58, 9 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, about the following text that you put on page Talk:Rickie Fowler:

HE WAS THE #2 JUNIOR PLAYER IN THE WORLD FOR THE LAST 2 YEARS. HE FINISHED RUNNER UP TO PHILIP FRANCIS IN THE 2006 US BOYS JUNIOR AMATEUR. IF THATS IS NOT CONSIDER NOTEABLE I DON'T KNOW

WHAT IS. PLESAAE REINSTATE THE PAGE.

This is the kind of information that should have been on the page in the first place; the only text that was there was saying that he is "an amateur golfer", which, you will probably agree, is not very notable. You are welcome to recreate the page if the new version contains indication of notability. It would be very useful too if you are able to provide some sources to back up the notability claims.

More generally, welcome to wikipedia — if you need any help, please do not hesitate to contact me. Schutz 07:14, 10 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Golfguy11! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 32 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Eddie McKiernan - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 00:12, 9 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Patrol survey

New page patrol – Survey Invitation

Hello Golfguy11! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you.

If this invitation also appears on other accounts you may have, please complete the survey once only.
If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it.

Please click HERE to take part.
Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback.

You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey

RC Patrol-related Proposals in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey

Greetings Recent Changes Patrollers!

This is a one-time-only message to inform you about technical proposals related to Recent Changes Patrol in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey that I think you may be interested in reviewing and perhaps even voting for:

Adjust number of entries and days at Last unpatrolled
Editor-focused central editing dashboard
"Hide trusted users" checkbox option on watchlists and related/recent changes (RC) pages
Real-Time Recent Changes App for Android
Shortcut for patrollers to last changes list

Further, there are more than 20 proposals related to Watchlists in general that you may be interested in reviewing. (and over 260 proposals in all, across many aspects of wikis)

Thank you for your consideration. Please note that voting for proposals continues through December 12, 2016.

Note: You received this message because you have transcluded {{User wikipedia/RC Patrol}} (user box) on your user page. Since this message is "one-time-only" there is no opt out for future mailings.

Best regards, Stevietheman — Delivered: 01:10, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Chino Challenge

The article Chino Challenge has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Can't locate any non-local, non-routine coverage of this event.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 09:55, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]