User talk:GhostGrinder34

Welcome![edit]

Hello, GhostGrinder34, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! JAGUAR 13:15, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Diddy Kong Racing[edit]

Wikipedia is not written entirely in American English. Please see WP:ENGVAR. JAGUAR 13:14, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you user:Jaguar[edit]

Thank you for the welcome message and the info about the English Wikipedia, I will keep that in mind when I make edits in the future. GhostGrinder34 🍔🌭🍕🍟 05:10, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Warnings.[edit]

I noticed your warnings on Ebolalaalalalallalalal's talk page. Please give warnings in order; you gave a level 2 warning -- from the start -- to a level 4im' warning. This is a fairly new user; and so are you. Make sure to not bite the newcomers and give some time with light warnings before reporting them. Thank you. → The Pancake of Heaven! 11:48, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I will do that in the future. I am not new to Wikipedia, I've edited from an IP address for years, this is just the first time I've had an account on Wikipedia. GhostGrinder34 🍔🌭🍕🍟 17:10, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

July 2016[edit]

Please stop making disruptive edits, as you did at Banjo-Tooie ‎.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. The repeated edits are disruptive because they make the edit history hard to follow. —C.Fred (talk) 02:01, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you blank a page, as you did with this edit to Banjo-Tooie.Donner60 (talk) 02:08, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

AIV and UAA[edit]

Hello and Welcome to Wikipedia! Just a quick heads up user accounts that are only issues because of their user name like the one you posted Here should be posed at Usernames for Administrator Attention (UAA). Accounts should only be reported at Administrator intervention against vandalism (AIV) if they have vandalized wikipedia. Happy editing! --Cameron₁₁₅₉₈ ^(Talk) 03:37, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Banjo-Tooie[edit]

What is the meaning of this? You reverted yourself fifty times. JAGUAR 11:48, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, Banjo-Tooie (Movie)[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Banjo-Tooie (Movie). First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Toy Story. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Toy Story – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Sro23 (talk) 22:50, 25 July 2016 (UTC) [reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

GhostGrinder34 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #16865 was submitted on Nov 08, 2016 10:03:22. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 10:03, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

GhostGrinder34 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I realize I have done some vandalism to Wikipedia, but now I am ready to make useful contributions

Decline reason:

You'll have to be far more convincing than this. Yamla (talk) 14:03, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.