User talk:Georgelgreco

Welcome!

Hello, Georgelgreco!

I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Getting Started

Tutorial
Learn everything you need to know to get started.

Introduction to contributing

The Teahouse
Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.

The Task Center
Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help.

Tips

Don't be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at first—it's fine to edit using common sense.
If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue at the article's talk page. Be civil, and don't restore the edit unless there is consensus.
Always use edit summaries to explain your changes.
When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source.
If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.

Happy editing! Cheers, 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 23:20, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:Fotini.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Fotini.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 09:30, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for quick answer...Can you please tell me with examples from my article what do you mean it needs more sources to establish notability

George Liristis Georgelgreco (talk) 22:45, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have asked a bot a question. They tend not to notice this and make no reply since they are automated processes.

The draft, now article, lacked sufficient sources to pass WP:BLP. You will see that it has been offered for discussion at WP:AFD because you moved it to mainspace before it was ready and because that is the second time this has been done. Please read WP:DRAFTIFY. the section referred to under WP:DRAFTOBJECT tells you why it has ben sent to WP:AFD

It is important that you do not take this personally. There is a period of seven days when you may improve the article before the community with reach consensus about retention or deletion. When you have improved please tell the discussion that you have done so. Background reading about this is WP:HEY 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 09:25, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Eleanna Finokalioti (Eleanna Fin) moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Eleanna Finokalioti (Eleanna Fin). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. win8x (talk) 22:31, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Eleanna Finokalioti (Eleanna Fin) (November 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Timtrent was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

IMDB may not be used as a reference. This cannot be reviewed until it is removed or replaced

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Eleanna Finokalioti (Eleanna Fin) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 23:02, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Georgelgreco! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 23:02, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Fotini.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Fotini.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a copyright violation and has no credible claim of fair use or permission. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 23:24, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Eleanna Finokalioti (Eleanna Fin) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Eleanna Finokalioti (Eleanna Fin) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eleanna Finokalioti (Eleanna Fin) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 09:19, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You asked for further information. Regrettably the links are essential. I will not paraphrase or copy our our policy pages. Please study the links. I will repeat what I posted near the head of this page:

The draft, now article, lacked sufficient sources to pass WP:BLP. You will see that it has been offered for discussion at WP:AFD because you moved it to mainspace before it was ready and because that is the second time this has been done. Please read WP:DRAFTIFY. the section referred to under WP:DRAFTOBJECT tells you why it has been sent to WP:AFD

It is important that you do not take this personally. There is a period of seven days when you may improve the article before the community with reach consensus about retention or deletion. When you have improved please tell the discussion that you have done so. Background reading about this is WP:HEY

Please also read WP:YOUTUBE which explains why Youtube is very rarely a valid source. Additionally, this is what is required for a living person:

For a living person we have a high standard of referencing. Every substantive fact you assert, especially one that is susceptible to potential challenge, requires a citation with a reference that is about them, and is independent of them, in multiple secondary sources which are WP:RS, and is significant coverage. Please also see WP:PRIMARY which details the limited permitted usage of primary sources and WP:SELFPUB which has clear limitations on self published sources. Providing sufficient references, ideally one per fact cited, that meet these tough criteria is likely to make this draft a clear acceptance (0.9 probability). Lack of them or an inability to find them is likely to mean that the person is not suitable for inclusion, certainly today.

Again, the links are essential. Please take your time and study them. There is sufficient time. Ask at WP:TEAHOUSE if you need anything extra explained to you. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 09:59, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article is returned to Draft:Eleanna Finokalioti (Eleanna Fin). I will perform a review for you. Please don;t skip submitting for review next time, It is not compulsory, but it saves a lot of alarm and upset 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 11:11, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Eleanna Finokalioti (Eleanna Fin) (November 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Timtrent was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

I am taking the unusual step of a second review. This has been to AfD and back since my prior review, please see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eleanna Finokalioti (Eleanna Fin). It was moved too soon, and by a misunderstanding.

WP:YOUTUBE shows the very restricted circumstance in which it may be used as a reference. Please double check your use of Youtube.

Cast lists just show she was in the cast. That is all they cann be used for. They do not verify notability.

For a living person we have a high standard of referencing. Every substantive fact you assert, especially one that is susceptible to potential challenge, requires a citation with a reference that is about them, and is independent of them, in multiple secondary sources which are WP:RS, and is significant coverage. Please also see WP:PRIMARY which details the limited permitted usage of primary sources and WP:SELFPUB which has clear limitations on self published sources. Providing sufficient references, ideally one per fact cited, that meet these tough criteria is likely to make this draft a clear acceptance (0.9 probability). Lack of them or an inability to find them is likely to mean that the person is not suitable for inclusion, certainly today.

Please resubmit for review' and do not just move it yourself to mainspace. Please ask at WP:AFCHD for any additional information you need to help you succeed.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Eleanna Finokalioti (Eleanna Fin) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 11:21, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Georgelgreco. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Draft:Eleanna Finokalioti (Eleanna Fin), you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template)—don't forget to give details of reliable sources supporting your suggestions;
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicizing, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:17, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Eleanna Finokalioti (Eleanna Fin) has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Eleanna Finokalioti (Eleanna Fin). Thanks! DoubleGrazing (talk) 17:41, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Eleanna Finokalioti (Eleanna Fin) (November 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Bobby Cohn were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

A lot of unverified statements of facts. I have done some maintenance tagging with {{citation needed}} and {{unreferenced section}}. I would suggest starting there and addressing those. Some other statements that do have citations don't seem to credibly verify the on-wiki prose it claims to support. Reads as an apparent WP:NOTEBOMB attempt to clear the notability threshold, which I do not think this subject meets presently. Even if this subject were notable, if the article in its present state were published to the mainspace, I credibly believe more than have of the actual prose could be slashed by someone citing WP:PROVEIT in regards to the statements as they are currently written/cited.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Eleanna Finokalioti (Eleanna Fin) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Bobby Cohn (talk) 17:58, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]