User talk:GMM1919

Allianssi Vantaa is a football club situated in the city of Vantaa in Finland. Allianssi Vantaa is not the same club as the former Finnish football club, AC Allianssi.

Allianssi Vantaa was founded in 2006 and they currently play in the fourt highest league in Finland, Kolmonen (division III). The club has a total of almost 4000 youth players in affiliate clubs in the city of Vantaa, such as KOPSE, KoiPS, TiPS and Vantaan Jalkapalloseura.

Allianssi Vantaa's homeground is called Pohjola Stadion. The stadium is situated in Myyrmäki and its capacity is 4,700. Pohjola Stadion was built in 2000. Pohjola Stadion was also the homeground of AC Allianssi.

Image tagging for Image:Cha Am Beachroad.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Cha Am Beachroad.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 15:05, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:FC Jokerit.png[edit]

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:FC Jokerit.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 06:20, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:FC Jokerit.png[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:FC Jokerit.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 08:06, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:250px-Finnairin Palloilijoiden logo.svg.png[edit]

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:250px-Finnairin Palloilijoiden logo.svg.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 15:20, 28 June 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 15:20, 28 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Whether the image is used on other Wikipedias is irrelevant- different projects have different policies and standards. Here, we demand that images provide source information, which that one doesn't. J Milburn (talk) 17:14, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:IFK-HJK 28.4.2008 007.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:IFK-HJK 28.4.2008 007.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 16:06, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Viikingit-IFK 006.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Viikingit-IFK 006.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 16:13, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of 116% Boys[edit]

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on 116% Boys, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because 116% Boys seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting 116% Boys, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 16:10, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File:Paulus.PNG[edit]

Hi, I think you forgot the license at File:Paulus.PNG. Also, could you go through some of your images and add some sort of description? I think they may be useful but I'm not exactly sure what they are. Thanks! -- Ricky81682 (talk) 09:59, 14 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know why but the license just wasn't added. I took care of it so no worries. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 19:04, 14 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

IFK Mariehamn[edit]

Why don't you think that the players from the autonomous Åland can't be recognized as such just like the players in Havnar Bóltfelag are recognized as players from the Faroe Islands? Both areas are autonomous territories, one within Denmark and the other within Finland. And if you check IFK Mariehamn's own website they separate the Ålander players [1] Närking (talk) 18:46, 25 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Because Åland hasn't got an official national team of its own, but Finland has, and some of the Ålander players in IFK Mariehamn have earned caps for Finnish junior national teams. -- GMM1919 22:41, 25 June 2009 (Finland time)

But still Åland is as autonomous as the Faroe Islands. And they do have national teams also [2]. And as I said the club itself makes a difference between the players from Åland and Finland. Närking (talk) 19:53, 25 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

They do, but (btw, I'm an active supporter of the club) that doesn't change the fact that the national team of Åland isn't recognized by UEFA or FIFA, and therefore I find it silly to recognize players of Finland as Ålanders when it comes to football. The Faroese national team has got a fully official status. -- GMM1919 20:00, 25 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

But it seems like the club itself doesn't think it's silly to recognize players as Ålanders. And also it gives an instant view which players are local (rather few). Närking (talk) 20:21, 25 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:FC Honka - IFK 19.7.2009 009.jpg[edit]

File Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:FC Honka - IFK 19.7.2009 009.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NW (Talk) 15:21, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. The image should've been released to the public domain, and I've mentioned this on the discussion page of the image. I've forgot how to do it, so do you think you can help me? GMM1919 (talk) 16:24, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Erik Sandvärn[edit]

The article Erik Sandvärn has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Player fails WP:ATHLETE as he has never played in a fully-pro league.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Giant Snowman 15:57, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs[edit]

Hello GMM1919! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 2 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 938 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

Tero Karhu - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Timo Askolin - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 09:22, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Timo Askolin[edit]

The article Timo Askolin has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The lack of sources indicates that the subject is non notable

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Stormbay (talk) 01:54, 9 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of FC Kasiysi[edit]

The article FC Kasiysi has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

There is no indication that this club has received significant coverage, meaning the article fails WP:GNG.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 22:01, 23 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Finish Cup[edit]

Help improving Finnish Cup please. The red seasons. Thanks.--Alexiulian25 (talk) 21:17, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:29, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Kauniaisten Jäähalli[edit]

The article Kauniaisten Jäähalli has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Exists but no indication of notability. Couldn't find any news articles that mentioned it.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Anarchyte (talk | work) 13:40, 18 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Scott Boden.JPG[edit]

The file File:Scott Boden.JPG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]