Jump to content

User talk:Fwaldman

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

License tagging for Image:Lattix Logo.gif[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Lattix Logo.gif. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 17:07, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I am duplicating my response to your question at Talk:Lattix, Inc. in case the article is deleted and you do not have a chance to see it.

This particular article is governed by the notability guidelines on companies. The rule of thumb here is noting whether the company has received significant or widespread coverage in secondary sources that are reliable and independent of the company (excluding company PR releases and information solely available on the company website—these sources may be used for additional information after notability has been established by secondary sources). All material must be attributable. For instance, the article asserts "award-winning". What awards? Can you demonstrate these?
I have removed the speedy deletion notice from this article because it does assert notability; however, it does not substantiate this assertion. It will need to supply verification of the information to avoid being tagged for consideration by other steps of the deletion process.
If you are closely associated with the subject, please carefully read our conflict of interest guideline. In such cases, you must be particularly careful to approach articles neutrally and without undue promotion. Statements like "provider of innovative software architecture management solutions that deliver software quality and lower risk throughout the application lifecycle" are not encyclopedic in tone.
I hope this is helpful. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 20:46, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Logo5.gif[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Logo5.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 22:38, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The article Lattix, Inc. has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable business, a provider of software architecture management solutions, apparently some kind of code checking tool for computer programmers. Referenced only to minor trade awards and general papers about the problem its product is supposed to solve.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 17:24, 28 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]