User talk:FunnyGuyNot
Undisclosed Paid Editor
[edit]It's very obvious that you are an undisclosed paid editor and per WP:COI if you do not start disclosing that you are paid, you will be blocked indefinitely per WP:NOTPROMO. Gurvinder | Talk 17:38, 4 July 2015 (UTC)
The article Mark Leigh has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.
If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. scope_creep (talk) 12:46, 23 November 2018 (UTC)
Nomination of Mark Leigh for deletion
[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mark Leigh is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mark Leigh until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. scope_creep (talk) 16:45, 26 November 2018 (UTC)