User talk:Fred Biggin

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

I have created my first page - "The Greeks (book)".

Some things haven't worked out:

1. The title shouldn't have (book) after it on this page - that was for disambiguation only.

2. I worked out how to do block quotes, but the citation number appears a line below instead of against the end of the text.

3. Under the heading "Chapters" all the chapters are along the same line, instead of vertical (as I inserted them). Putting in Returns after each hasn't helped.

I'll probably expand the article, but want to get this stuff right first.

I'd be grateful for any help - thanks.

Fred Biggin (talk) 11:40, 17 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Fred. As far as I can tell, you haven't yet created a page - aside from the above message, the only edit made by this account to date is this edit to the sandbox (which has since been cleared, as the sandbox is for test purposes only). Unless you created the article using aonther account (and I can't find it if you did), I'm afraid it looks as though your work has not been saved. I suggest you try recreating the page in a userspace draft, such as User:Fred Biggin/The Greeks.

In direct response to your questions above:

The correct title would probably be just The Greeks (currently a redirect), but you'd need to add a hatnote to direct people to Greeks (finance).
Without an example it's difficult to see the exact problem, but if you're using a citation for a blockquote, it needs to go inside the <blockquote> tags, not after them.
Wikipedia markup doesn't recognise newlines - for a vertical list, either user asterisks for bullets:

* one

* two

* three

which renders as:

one
two
three

or hashes for a numbered list:

# one

# two

# three

which gives:

one
two
three

I hope this is helpful - feel free to drop me a line on my talkpage if you need further assistance. Yunshui 雲‍水 12:00, 17 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback[edit]

Hello, Fred Biggin. You have new messages at Yunshui's talk page.
Message added 13:26, 17 April 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

(by the way, when you leave a message, remember to sign it by adding four tildes - like this: ~~~~. Yunshui 雲‍水 13:26, 17 April 2013 (UTC))[reply]

Ways to improve The Greeks (book)[edit]

Hi, I'm Yunshui. Fred Biggin, thanks for creating The Greeks (book)!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix - at present, it lauds the book rather heavily, which isn't appropriate in a Wikipedia article. There's also a pressing need for more sources.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

I've got to go offline now, but I've asked User:Tokyogirl79 (a very experienced editor on book-related articles) to take a look when she has time. I'll take another look at it myself tomorrow. It's coming together nicely - thanks for adding a new article and in doing so, improving Wikipedia. Yunshui 雲‍水 14:03, 17 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback[edit]

Hello, Fred Biggin. You have new messages at Yunshui's talk page.
Message added 07:06, 18 April 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Yunshui 雲‍水 07:06, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback[edit]

Hello, Fred Biggin. You have new messages at Yunshui's talk page.
Message added 10:01, 18 April 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Yunshui 雲‍水 10:01, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, thanks for the correction. I'll keep that in mind next time.

Did I "combine published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say" or was that just general advice?

All the best,

Fred Biggin (talk) 14:35, 11 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

May 2013[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to The Bulletin, but we cannot accept original research. Original research also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Dl2000 (talk) 01:41, 11 May 2013 (UTC) Hi,[reply]

The file is from the album of an 88-year-old woman - she owns it & would own the copyright, as anyone who owned it before - i.e. her parents - would now be dead.

I don't understand the instructions on what I have to do. I want to add very simple information to a Wikipedia page - I have no interest in becoming an IT person, and lack the time to do so.

Can this communication do the trick please?

Thanks Fred Biggin (talk) 11:15, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I've sent the email to the address provided. Thanks again.

Fred Biggin (talk) 14:21, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Leslie Edward Smith, founder of the Ormond Amateur Football Club.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Leslie Edward Smith, founder of the Ormond Amateur Football Club.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to [email protected], stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to [email protected].

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 14:13, 22 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, sorry - I'm still getting the hang of this.

Thanks for the correction.

Fred Biggin (talk) 04:35, 23 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I find this (editing a file) a bizarre way to communicate, when so many easier ways are on offer.

I'm disappointed that the above-discussed photo has been removed, without anyone telling me, even tho I fulfilled the copyright requirements as well as I could understand them.

That said, the instructions were very hard to understand. If you want ordinary people to participate in Wikipedia, you will have to make it less the property of an overly-protective and overly zealous priesthood of editors.

I'm ready to give up on it for these reasons, & I notice from recent articles on WP that I am not alone.

The Da Vinci Code[edit]

Hi. Welcome to Wikipedia, and thanks for working to improve the site with your edit to The Da Vinci Code, as we really appreciate your participation. However, the edit had to be reverted, because Wikipedia cannot accept unsourced material or original research. This includes material lacking cited sources, material obtained through personal knowledge, or which constitutes the an analysis or interpretation by the editor that is not found in cited sources. Wikipedia requires that the material in its articles be accompanied by reliable, verifiable (usually secondary) sources explicitly cited in the article text in the form of an inline citation, which you can learn to make here. If you ever have any other questions about editing, or need help regarding the site's policies, just let me know by leaving a message for me in a new section at the bottom of my talk page. Thanks. :-) Nightscream (talk) 17:19, 22 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Leslie Edward Smith, founder of the Ormond Amateur Football Club.jpg[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Leslie Edward Smith, founder of the Ormond Amateur Football Club.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:01, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:16, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]