User talk:Frank/Archive 11
 | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
According to the WP:Academic #3 the person is notable as long as he is a fellow of some notable society, in this case, he is a research fellow at the National Science Foundation a respected organization, and therefore makes him notable.--Mishae (talk) 03:40, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
- The article (and its lone source) do not say that; what they do say is that as a graduate student, he was a graduate research fellow. That is not the same thing. Nevertheless, you are free to follow the procedures set forth in WP:PROD. Frank | talk 03:50, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Can you point to me where in the article it backs up the claim that "Masloff, who was 70 years old when she took office, was characterized by her short stature and raspy, nasal voice, along with her ability to speak Pittsburghese (the local dialect). These attributes were quickly caricatured by political cartoonists. Her image as a "little Jewish grandmother" made her a well liked figure, even by those who disagreed with her administration. Masloff is best remembered for pop-culture malaprops. She once referred to Bruce Springsteen as "Bruce Bedspring". When the Grateful Dead came to Pittsburgh, she called them the "Dreadful Dead" and their fans "Deadenders"."? I see the part where it mentions her referring to "The Who" as "The How" (which is why I left that in), but I don't see any of the rest of that paragraph. Thanks. Canadian Paul 23:01, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
- My mistake, and I've self-reverted. You are quite correct; the one thing you left is the only thing that actually is cited in that reference. I mis-read the edit. If I can find cites, I'll restore the info, but not before. My apologies. Frank | talk 23:32, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
Mecaplast Group
Thank-you for the recent modifications you have made to the page. Sincerely appreciated.(Albert av (talk) 14:45, 14 February 2014 (UTC))
- No worries. It would be nice to find more independent sources; do you know of any? Frank | talk 14:46, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
Request for comment
Hello there, a proposal regarding pre-adminship review has been raised at Village pump by Anna Frodesiak. Your comments here is very much appreciated. Many thanks. Jim Carter through MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:47, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
Checkuser
Hello, since you're no longer a checkuser, would you remind removing Category:Wikipedia checkusers from your userpage? I came here while looking for assistance from a checkuser. Nyttend (talk) 13:56, 31 May 2014 (UTC)
Talkback
Message added 20:33, 2 March 2015 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Shearonink (talk) 20:33, 2 March 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:55, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Requesting rollback
The user Helmoony is mass-removing "Tunisian arabic" in articles that was in place since several months. after the debate in Tunisia portal in september, an admin finally decided to grant the mention of Tunisian arabic for the names of people and places. Things were so settled since then, but the user Helmoony is recently removing all the mentions, could you please do something about it ? Thank you.Zangouang (talk) 16:20, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
- I don't think I'm qualified to judge the merits of this particular matter; I read the discussion at WP:ANI and it seems there is a long history to this. Perhaps those more closely involved can offer counsel. Frank | talk 12:14, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
You've got mail!
Message added 01:34, 10 February 2016 (UTC). It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.
Courcelles (talk) 01:34, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for August 9
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited North Carolina, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hogs. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:41, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
Aerosmith
Sorry, a lot of the edits seemed to be unnecessary grammar and word choice changes (most cases, for the worse) and adding too many unnecessary details to the lead. I do agree that the reference improvements and perhaps some of the changes to the body were salvageable. I'll try to restore them when I get a chance. If you have time, and would like to at least restore the reference improvements, I would appreciate it. Abog (talk) 17:46, 22 August 2016 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protection
Hello, Frank. This message is intended to notify administrators of important changes to the protection policy.
Extended confirmed protection (also known as "30/500 protection") is a new level of page protection that only allows edits from accounts at least 30 days old and with 500 edits. The automatically assigned "extended confirmed" user right was created for this purpose. The protection level was created following this community discussion with the primary intention of enforcing various arbitration remedies that prohibited editors under the "30 days/500 edits" threshold to edit certain topic areas.
In July and August 2016, a request for comment established consensus for community use of the new protection level. Administrators are authorized to apply extended confirmed protection to combat any form of disruption (e.g. vandalism, sock puppetry, edit warring, etc.) on any topic, subject to the following conditions:
- Extended confirmed protection may only be used in cases where semi-protection has proven ineffective. It should not be used as a first resort.
- A bot will post a notification at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard of each use. MusikBot currently does this by updating a report, which is transcluded onto the noticeboard.
Please review the protection policy carefully before using this new level of protection on pages. Thank you.
This message was sent to the administrators' mass message list. To opt-out of future messages, please remove yourself from the list. 17:47, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
Two-Factor Authentication now available for admins
Hello,
Please note that TOTP based two-factor authentication is now available for all administrators. In light of the recent compromised accounts, you are encouraged to add this additional layer of security to your account. It may be enabled on your preferences page in the "User profile" tab under the "Basic information" section. For basic instructions on how to enable two-factor authentication, please see the developing help page for additional information. Important: Be sure to record the two-factor authentication key and the single use keys. If you lose your two factor authentication and do not have the keys, it's possible that your account will not be recoverable. Furthermore, you are encouraged to utilize a unique password and two-factor authentication for the email account associated with your Wikimedia account. This measure will assist in safeguarding your account from malicious password resets. Comments, questions, and concerns may be directed to the thread on the administrators' noticeboard. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:33, 12 November 2016 (UTC)
A new user right for New Page Patrollers
Hi Frank.
A new user group, New Page Reviewer, has been created in a move to greatly improve the standard of new page patrolling. The user right can be granted by any admin at PERM. It is highly recommended that admins look beyond the simple numerical threshold and satisfy themselves that the candidates have the required skills of communication and an advanced knowledge of notability and deletion. Admins are automatically included in this user right.
It is anticipated that this user right will significantly reduce the work load of admins who patrol the performance of the patrollers. However,due to the complexity of the rollout, some rights may have been accorded that may later need to be withdrawn, so some help will still be needed to some extent when discovering wrongly applied deletion tags or inappropriate pages that escape the attention of less experienced reviewers, and above all, hasty and bitey tagging for maintenance. User warnings are available here but very often a friendly custom message works best.
If you have any questions about this user right, don't hesitate to join us at WT:NPR. (Sent to all admins).MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:47, 15 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
Hello, Frank. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Protection on Debbie Reynolds
Can you reset the PC protection? That one ends first, while the semi-protection ends later? --George Ho (talk) 03:21, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
Done Frank | talk 03:24, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
Maxine or Maxene?
Did it every occur to you that the source might be in error? The authenticity of source information cannot be guaranteed or verified. This same problem exists with Tonya Harding. Her middle name is spelled Maxene, but Maxine might be the correct spelling.
I perused an exhaustive list of girls' names; Maxine comes up, but there is no listing for Maxene.
I would be willing to lay odds that "Maxine" is the correct spelling for the name.
Anthony22 (talk) 15:02, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
- Sure it occurred to me, so I checked other sources and found it as "Maxene" with an E in other places, including CNN. It's not our job to decide that an "exhaustive list" is more accurate than the actual source we are referencing for the information. Frank | talk 15:10, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
- In addition, the spelling of a person's name is - whether we spelling snobs like it or not, and I do count myself as a spelling snob - a personal thing. I personally know of people who spell the name Michael as Micheal, which is "wrong", except that it's what is on their birth certificates, so by default it is right. Frank | talk 15:14, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
If you will click on the following link, you will see that the the name is spelled Maxine:
http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0001666/bio
A great deal of source information is hearsay, conjecture, speculation, or information to the nth degree. I guess that you would have to go all the way back to Debbie Reynold's mother to verify the spelling of the name.
- I'm not saying that there are no references that use Maxine as the spelling; indeed, I agree that is by far the more common spelling I've heard of. But IMDB as a source? This essay explains why that's a bad idea. Sure, it's an essay, not a policy, but as long as I've been around these parts, IMDB hasn't been what we think of as a reliable source. Frank | talk 15:36, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter - February 2017
News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2017). This first issue is being sent out to all administrators, if you wish to keep receiving it please subscribe. Your feedback is welcomed.
Administrator changes
NinjaRobotPirate • Schwede66 • K6ka • Ealdgyth • Ferret • Cyberpower678 • Mz7 • Primefac • Dodger67
Briangotts • JeremyA • BU Rob13
Guideline and policy news
- A discussion to workshop proposals to amend the administrator inactivity policy at Wikipedia talk:Administrators has been in process since late December 2016.
- Wikipedia:Pending changes/Request for Comment 2016 closed with no consensus for implementing Pending changes level 2 with new criteria for use.
- Following an RfC, an activity requirement is now in place for bots and bot operators.
Technical news
- When performing some administrative actions the reason field briefly gave suggestions as text was typed. This change has since been reverted so that issues with the implementation can be addressed. (T34950)
- Following the latest RfC concluding that Pending Changes 2 should not be used on the English Wikipedia, an RfC closed with consensus to remove the options for using it from the page protection interface, a change which has now been made. (T156448)
- The Foundation has announced a new community health initiative to combat harassment. This should bring numerous improvements to tools for admins and CheckUsers in 2017.
Arbitration
- The Arbitration Committee released a response to the Wikimedia Foundation's statement on paid editing and outing.
Obituaries
- JohnCD (John Cameron Deas) passed away on 30 December 2016. John began editing Wikipedia seriously during 2007 and became an administrator in November 2009.
13:36, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
Request for deleted page information
Hello I'm the admin of the Katy Perry Wiki and I was wondering if I can see the information from the deleted page "(A) Katy Perry". IT was deleted years ago, but I thought it would be worth a shot asking an admin. Thank you have a great day. Cyberjoel95 (talk) 05:13, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
- I'm not clear what you're asking for. The page history for Katy Perry goes back to 2008. What do you need? Frank | talk 15:21, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
On this day, 11 years ago...
|
Hey, Frank. I'd like to wish you a wonderful First Edit Day on behalf of the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day! Lepricavark (talk) 18:48, 21 May 2017 (UTC) |
|
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
Hello, Frank. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Hey! Based on your edits to NationStates, I thought maybe you would be interested that I started a series of userboxes for the game. Feel free to add any or add your own!-🐦Do☭torWho42 (⭐) 05:50, 16 December 2017 (UTC)
12 years of editing
|
|
Hey, Frank. I'd like to wish you a wonderful First Edit Day on behalf of the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day! Chris Troutman (talk) 00:48, 21 May 2018 (UTC) |
|
I've restored the article, and expanded the it significantly. I argued for notability on the talk page. Harizotoh9 (talk) 09:31, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
Hello, Frank. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 special circular
 |
Administrators must secure their accounts
The Arbitration Committee may require a new RfA if your account is compromised.
|
This message was sent to all administrators following a recent motion. Thank you for your attention. For the Arbitration Committee, Cameron11598 02:49, 4 May 2019 (UTC)
Administrator account security (Correction to Arbcom 2019 special circular)
ArbCom would like to apologise and correct our previous mass message in light of the response from the community.
Since November 2018, six administrator accounts have been compromised and temporarily desysopped. In an effort to help improve account security, our intention was to remind administrators of existing policies on account security — that they are required to "have strong passwords and follow appropriate personal security practices." We have updated our procedures to ensure that we enforce these policies more strictly in the future. The policies themselves have not changed. In particular, two-factor authentication remains an optional means of adding extra security to your account. The choice not to enable 2FA will not be considered when deciding to restore sysop privileges to administrator accounts that were compromised.
We are sorry for the wording of our previous message, which did not accurately convey this, and deeply regret the tone in which it was delivered.
For the Arbitration Committee, -Cameron11598 21:03, 4 May 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
| Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Today's Wikipedian 10 years ago
 | |
| Ten years! |
|---|
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:38, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
14th anniversary on Wikipedia!
|
|
Hey, Frank. I'd like to wish you a wonderful First Edit Day on behalf of the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day! Chris Troutman (talk) 16:01, 21 May 2020 (UTC) |
|
Happy First Edit Day!
Have a very happy first edit anniversary!
From the Birthday Committee, CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 22:55, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
Happy...
|
Wishing Frank a very happy adminship anniversary on behalf of the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day! CommanderWaterford (talk) 07:02, 2 July 2020 (UTC) |
Happy Adminship Anniversary!
Have a very happy adminship anniversary on your special day!
Best wishes, CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 20:22, 2 July 2020 (UTC)
Hello,
This is Nupur Chine. I had done few edits which were deleted from the articles. Can you please copy it to my userpage? Nupur Chine (talk) 12:55, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
Happy First Edit Day!
|
Happy First Edit Day, Frank, from the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day! StarshipSLS (Talk), (My Contributions) 15:06, 21 May 2021 (UTC) |
StarshipSLS (Talk), (My Contributions) 15:06, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
Happy First Edit Day!
Have a very happy first edit anniversary!
From the Birthday Committee, CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 18:41, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
Hello Frank, my text on Valérie Belin page has been deleted because it has been identified as copyrights infringement, can I recover a copy of the deleted version on my page? So how can I add a bibliography (which is also on the artist's website) without it being considered plagiarism? Thanks a lot Clotse (talk) 15:53, 28 June 2021 (UTC)Clotse
- Hi Clotse - thanks for contacting me. If you are copying and pasting text directly from another web site, that's plagiarism and not allowed. You'll need to re-write the content in your own words. Frank | talk 17:32, 28 June 2021 (UTC)
Happy Adminship Anniversary!
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
| Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Administrators will no longer be autopatrolled
A recently closed Request for Comment (RFC) reached consensus to remove Autopatrolled from the administrator user group. You may, similarly as with Edit Filter Manager, choose to self-assign this permission to yourself. This will be implemented the week of December 13th, but if you wish to self-assign you may do so now. To find out when the change has gone live or if you have any questions please visit the Administrator's Noticeboard. 20:05, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
How we will see unregistered users
Hi!
You get this message because you are an admin on a Wikimedia wiki.
When someone edits a Wikimedia wiki without being logged in today, we show their IP address. As you may already know, we will not be able to do this in the future. This is a decision by the Wikimedia Foundation Legal department, because norms and regulations for privacy online have changed.
Instead of the IP we will show a masked identity. You as an admin will still be able to access the IP. There will also be a new user right for those who need to see the full IPs of unregistered users to fight vandalism, harassment and spam without being admins. Patrollers will also see part of the IP even without this user right. We are also working on better tools to help.
If you have not seen it before, you can read more on Meta. If you want to make sure you don’t miss technical changes on the Wikimedia wikis, you can subscribe to the weekly technical newsletter.
We have two suggested ways this identity could work. We would appreciate your feedback on which way you think would work best for you and your wiki, now and in the future. You can let us know on the talk page. You can write in your language. The suggestions were posted in October and we will decide after 17 January.
Thank you. /Johan (WMF)
18:13, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
New administrator activity requirement
The administrator policy has been updated with new activity requirements following a successful Request for Comment.
Beginning January 1, 2023, administrators who meet one or both of the following criteria may be desysopped for inactivity if they have:
- Made neither edits nor administrative actions for at least a 12-month period OR
- Made fewer than 100 edits over a 60-month period
Administrators at risk for being desysopped under these criteria will continue to be notified ahead of time. Thank you for your continued work.
22:52, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
Happy First Edit Day!
|
Happy First Edit Day, Frank, from the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day! Comr Melody Idoghor (talk) 13:18, 21 May 2022 (UTC) |