User talk:For the love of academia

Welcome![edit]

Hello, For the love of academia, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to The Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! Doug Weller talk 11:51, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

April 2024[edit]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Lemba people, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Doug Weller talk 12:51, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Are you copying this from elsewhere?[edit]

Because just as your unsourced additions are against policy and can get you blocked, copying from elsewhere unless the source is expliclty copyright free is illegal, not just against policy. Doug Weller talk 12:52, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What other accounts have you had?[edit]

Doug Weller talk 13:01, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Doug, I have added sources to everything I wrote now, and no I am not copying and pasting - believe it or not, I may actually have a bit of extra knowledge about the Lemba that you may be lacking. Regards :) For the love of academia (talk) 13:11, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Generally avoiding a question is done because the answer would incriminate the person. Doug Weller talk 15:08, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Changing a quotation to suit your opinion is a form of vandalism[edit]

As you did here.Special:Diff/1217032938. Doug Weller talk 13:36, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright[edit]

Hello For the love of academia! Your additions to Lemba people have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source. You must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. Read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices. Our policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 21:25, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

How many times do you need to be warned about adding unsourced material[edit]

Special:Diff/1224315888 is worrying, as you say you don’t understand why it was removed. Doug Weller talk 19:37, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It was sourced, I added where I sourced it from Le Roux, Magdel (November 1999). "In The Search of Understanding The Old Testament In Africa: The Case of The Lemba" (PDF). University of South Africa, page 33. You can feel free to check if you wish For the love of academia (talk) 19:43, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The paragraph says

One example of oral tradition regarding origin of the Lemba centers around the time of the Babylonian Invasion and the subsequent fall of the First Temple when the Lemba left Judea. According to oral traditon, after fleeing persecution, the Lemba settled in Sena. This is seemingly confirmed by Yemenite Jewish folklore which states that "their ancient forebears migrated from Palestine to Yemen, exactly f

i see no source. What I see is a statement in Wikipedia’s voice and we don’t do that. The text above that has the source you mentioned but it’s my rewrite to make it accurately reflect the source. Add a source or I’ll delete it tomorrow. Doug Weller talk 20:43, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"vi) According to folklore of the Yemenite Jews, their ancient forebears migrated from Palestine to Yemen, exactly forty-two years before the destruction of the First Temple (3.2.1.2). This is again in concurrence with the above mentioned tradition of origin of the Lemba" direct quote from page 233 For the love of academia (talk) 23:46, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've rewritten it to "One example of oral tradition regarding origin of the Lemba centers around the time of the Babylonian Invasion and the subsequent fall of the First Temple. According to Yemenite Jewish folklore, the Yemenite's predecessors "migrated from Palestine to Yemen, exactly forty-two years before the destruction of the First Temple". It is speculated that this folklore could be referring to the Lemba people due to the similarities it shares with Lemba oral tradition", coming from the quote on page 233 I mentioned above, hope that clears it up. For the love of academia (talk) 00:04, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not on p. 233 of this pdf[1] - and did you see the statement "The oral traditions of the Lemba and the historical, archaeological and genetic data constitute the possibility that the immigration of the Lemba to Africa could have taken place even before the Christian era, but more probably before the 6th century ". Comment on that? And did you see she uses Robert Gayre possibly more than anyone else? Comments on that? Doug Weller talk 14:04, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It is literally on the page which has 233 written at the bottom, I have verified. It is normal for official numbers to sometimes not match the numbers allocated by the pdf. Double check if you want For the love of academia (talk) 18:50, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Do you realise how unhelpful that is? Readers will have access to the pdf but probably not the book, and that includes me. Interesting that you didn’t let me know what page on the pdf or answer my actual questions. Doug Weller talk 19:20, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Okay well it’s 244 on the pdf, but at the bottom of the page it say 233, sorry for the confusion. For the love of academia (talk) 22:45, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Le Roux is an unreliable source[edit]

See[[2]]. I've read several of her other publications, she always depends heavily on Robert Gayre. Doug Weller talk 07:58, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Changing a quote so it is inaccurate[edit]

With this edit[3] you added "some" to a quote from Tudor Parfitt - but he didn't write "some", he wrote "Those". Please explain. Doug Weller talk 11:45, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Adding material that made it appear that all Lemba follow the same culinary practices[edit]

Same link as above, the section headed "Dietary Laws". That isn't the case. This article misses out a lot of scholarly literature, probably due to pov editing such as yours. Doug Weller talk 12:35, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your section on other forms of DNA testing was again unsourced[edit]

It was presumably original research. You'd need good secondary sources for it. You really shouldn't be editing anything until you learn our policies and guidelines. Doug Weller talk 14:28, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]