User talk:Fidrabooks

Welcome[edit]

Welcome!

Hello, Fidrabooks, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your edits have not conformed to Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy (NPOV), and have been reverted. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media.

There's a page about the NPOV policy that has tips on how to effectively write about disparate points of view without compromising the NPOV status of the article as a whole. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me my talk page. Again, welcome! Shootthedevgru (talk) 10:19, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Elinor Lyon[edit]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Elinor Lyon, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Elinor Lyon. Shootthedevgru (talk) 10:19, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Editing and References[edit]

Hello. I see you added to The Far-Distant Oxus and to a few other pages. One point you will need to know when editing is that footnotes only work if there is "{%{reflist}%}" (but without the "%" signs, which are only there to stop the software converting this) on the page to say where the footnotes should go. As to the content added, I'm happy myself to see a reference to the fact that Fidra Books are bringing the book out again. I'd noticed that from Google searches and was going to add the fact myself once the book was actually out. But you should be aware that by Wikipedia social norms it's regarded as better not to add material where one might be seen as having a conflict of interest (see WP:COI). If, as I imagine, you are involved with the firm "Fidra Books", it might be better to let people know on the talk pages of the article that your firm is reissuing a book. Someone else can then decide whether the information is merely advertising or should be in the article - I imagine with these fondly remembered out-of-print books that there'll always be someone who thinks the information is useful. I hope this is helpful (it's meant that way). N p holmes (talk) 12:22, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry not to reply to your query earlier (I'm normally working during the week and only happened to look at my watchlist on my lunch break). I shouldn't pretend to be an expert on Wikipedia usage. I've only written here myself for a few months. I imagine that the kind of information that one would find in a very dry reference work would be unobjectionable to anyone, i.e. nothing where a reader, knowing who wrote it, would say "Well they would say that, wouldn't they?" I don't know whether the Elinor Lyon article is objectionable in that respect (it wants perhaps a little more of the things one would look for in a reference work on the writing career - when were important books published and by which publisher?). The editor who marked the article for deletion was patrolling, I think (editors go through the lists of new articles to spot vanity articles, pointless articles, vandalism, advertisements, libel etc.). If anyone still thinks the article should be deleted, one would need to establish notability from e.g. scholarly literature, but the question may not come up. N p holmes (talk) 08:04, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sheila Stuart[edit]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Sheila Stuart, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Sheila Stuart. Shootthedevgru (talk) 11:05, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fidra Books[edit]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Fidra Books, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Fidra Books. Shootthedevgru (talk) 11:08, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. This article is an attempt to give people accurate information about the author. Nowhere in the article does it say that the books are being reprinted... I will remove the link to our website.

May I also ask: there are many entries about publishers (and I know that some were written by the companies themselves). Are they also subject to deletion?

I'm not try to break rules or offend anyone; I'm just a bit unclear about how the rules are being applied. We partially decided to do this because material from our introductions was being used without citation, and also that inaccurate information about our authors was on the site.

Thank you. Fidrabooks (talk) 11:21, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Remember that in order for articles to be from a neutral point of view, it must not be written by persons or organisations directly affiliated with the subject. Judging by your username (Fidrabooks), you are obviously a publisher of the books, and this can constitute to advertising (See WP:SPAM and Wikipedia:Conflict of interest). Also, if the books you publish are indeed notable, someone else will probably notice and could write an article on them. Otherwise, they are not really notable, and may not merit inclusion in Wikipedia. Shootthedevgru (talk) 03:04, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

May 2010[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that your username, Fidrabooks, may not meet Wikipedia's username policy because Wikipedia disapproves of accounts named after companies, because it's not apparent whether there's a single editor connected to the account, or if it's a "role account", which is right out. After all, a role can't license its contributions.. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. As an alternative, you may file for a change of username, or you may simply create a new account and use that for editing. Thank you. SarekOfVulcan (talk) 20:15, 7 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing Wikipedia because your username, Fidrabooks, does not meet our username policy.

Your username is the only reason for this block. You are welcome to choose a new username (see below).

A username should not be promotional, related to a "real-world" group or organization, misleading, offensive, or disruptive. Also, usernames may not end in the word "bot" unless the account is an approved bot account.

You are encouraged to choose a new account name that meets our policy guidelines. Alternatively, if you have already made edits and you wish to keep your existing contributions under a new name, then you may request a change in username by:

Adding {{unblock-un|your new username here}} on your user talk page. You should be able to do this even though you are blocked, as you can usually still edit your own talk page. If not, you may wish to contact the blocking administrator by clicking on "E-mail this user" on their talk page.
At an administrator's discretion, you may be unblocked for 24 hours to file a request.
Please note that you may only request a name that is not already in use, so please check here for a listing of already taken names. The account is created upon acceptance, thus do not try to create the new account before making the request for a name change. For more information, please see Wikipedia:Changing username.

If you feel that you were blocked in error, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|Your reason here}}, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. -- Cirt (talk) 12:34, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]