User talk:Feinoa/Archive 1
 | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
The article Singapore you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold 
. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Singapore for issues which need to be addressed. SilkTork (talk) 20:03, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
- I noticed a lot of edits have been made since the initial review. Great job. If you require any resources with regards to sourcing/citations, do let me know. - Mailer Diablo 07:02, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
- Please do fill in your edit summaries when you save your edits.--Xaiver0510 (talk) 01:36, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Singapore Changi Airport
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Singapore Changi Airport you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. 
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Nigos -- Nigos (talk) 11:00, 11 September 2019 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Singapore Airlines
The article Singapore Airlines you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Singapore Airlines for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of KN2731 -- KN2731 (talk) 12:20, 14 September 2019 (UTC)
Grab
Hey Feinoa, hope you are doing well. Just a note that I looked at Grab and restored some of the deleted content, particularly historical information. Since Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, the historical information is always kept in the article. Another point is that companies are usually referred to as "country-based", particularly if it has changed headquarters (most newspapers describe Grab as "Singapore based"). I have redone most of the other edits after my initial undo. Let me know if you have any concerns. We can discuss on the article talk as well. PS: I appreciate your contributions to Japan–Singapore relations. Good work and happy editing.--DreamLinker (talk) 15:54, 18 September 2019 (UTC)
Thanks, but I would appreciate it if you would stop tracking my edits. Feinoa (talk) 16:35, 18 September 2019 (UTC)
- I am deeply sorry, if it made you feel uncomfortable. Most new editors take a while to understand the guidelines and article structures, as well as how editors interact on Wikipedia. It is usually normal to review some of the edits and do clean ups when required. The aim here is not to follow the editor around and cause distress, but rather to fix any accidental slip ups (and ultimately improve the encyclopaedia). It also helps to provide feedback/suggestions to the editor so that there is no need to review future edits any more. In your case, I am happy that you have followed the guidelines in WP:PRESERVE, WP:DEADREF and I don't see these particular issues any more in your recent edits. Another suggestion I can offer is to always leave an edit summary. Edits without a summary are likely to be scrutinised by other editors (since the purpose of the edit is not clear at first glance). Additionally, try not to edit war as well, but instead open a discussion on the talk. I think you are contributing well overall and I just wanted to offer some suggestions/feedback. Please don't get me wrong.--DreamLinker (talk) 18:25, 18 September 2019 (UTC)
2019 Hong Kong protests
I would appreciate it if you stop reverting edits and trying to create an edit war over the wording of "Hong Kong" vs "Hong Kong, China". Also, please come up with a better reason than 'stable version' for your reversions, as they are what makes the article unstable. Thank you. Yny501 (talk) 05:51, 1 October 2019 (UTC)
The only one trying to create an 'edit war' is you. Feinoa (talk) 09:07, 1 October 2019 (UTC)
You're the one who keeps changing it, and you're avoiding edit war autobans by making 2 edits or less every 24 hours. Don't waste your time, and don't act like you're paid for editing Wikipedia if you're not. Yny501 (talk) 09:14, 1 October 2019 (UTC)
Bad faith much? What point are you trying to make exactly? Feinoa (talk) 09:37, 1 October 2019 (UTC)
My point is made - you know you're initiating an edit war, so you've stopped your disruptive editing. You're also admitting that your actions are leading others to assume bad faith, which is a good step. Yny501 (talk) 16:21, 1 October 2019 (UTC)
October 2019
Hello, I'm Loriendrew. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Kobe, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page.
- Feel free to update the numbers as long as a valid source is provided. The referenced values have been restored. ☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(ring-ring) 00:21, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
 | Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Your GA nomination of Singapore Changi Airport
The article Singapore Changi Airport you nominated as a good article has failed 
; see Talk:Singapore Changi Airport for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Nigos -- Nigos (talk) 20:21, 17 December 2019 (UTC)
2019–20 Hong Kong protests NPOV dispute
On the 2019–20 Hong Kong protests talk page could you please specify the NPOV problem you have found with the title so we can make appropriate changes, thanks — RealFakeKimT 08:39, 11 January 2020 (UTC)
- I have removed the tag for now. 8 hours have passed since Feinoa had tagged the article. It is plenty of time for them to put their words on the Talk page. robertsky (talk) 10:18, 11 January 2020 (UTC)
January 2020
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Singapore Changi Airport, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Nguyen QuocTrung (talk) 07:04, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Sources provided. Feinoa (talk) 13:39, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Singapore you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Armanaziz -- Armanaziz (talk) 13:00, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
Please help me racially motivated edits
I made a youtuBe video on this.Title is called Wiki admins ST47 and EvergreenFir helping racist user Hunan201p https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i1ed_NwQ7ds
Please come to the talk page of Descent from Genghis Khan and Mongoloid. PLEASE HELP https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Descent_from_Genghis_Khan https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Mongoloid
I evidence to show racially motivated edits are involved. For example have been making double standard racist edits against East Eurasian males, genetics, achievement, anthropology and everything related to it from 2019 march to 2020. BUT NOBODY TRIES TO STOP HIM and let's him continue.
An than unfortunately you have wiki admins EvergreenFir who does nothing to solve this. Defending the edits of Hunan201p, not allowing anyone to removes his edits. Why doesn't he remove the controversial dispute if he wants to make this fair and square instead he just simply allows. Hunan201p to keep his version of the edits https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:EvergreenFir
The minute you even try to remove EvergreenFir will block page, block your account, and restore all the edits of Hunan201p
Descent from Genghis Khan, all 5 bodies were Mongoloid were edited since 2016 ( with over 1,000,000 page views since december 2016). Why remove all of sudden just because it's Hunan201p https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Descent_from_Genghis_Khan&diff=753061615&oldid=752989020
For example the edits that Hunan removed from Central Asia section of interracial marriage had existed since 2012 Why was this allowed for nearly 8 years (with over estimated 7,000,000 page views possibly ) https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Interracial_marriage&diff=480229643&oldid=480228326
Why doe wiki editor EvergreenFir and ST47 help Hunan201p https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:ST47
You can see that instead of removing Hunan201p edits it removes all the edits that every other users have edited. Many of them were friends, and some people I had asked after seeing what's going
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mongoloid&action=history https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Descent_from_Genghis_Khan&action=history-User talk:86.131.7.177 —Preceding undated comment added 19:55, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
The article Singapore you nominated as a good article has passed 
; see Talk:Singapore for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Armanaziz -- Armanaziz (talk) 07:02, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Jewel Changi Airport
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Jewel Changi Airport you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Breakjan -- Breakjan (talk) 19:42, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Jewel Changi Airport
The article Jewel Changi Airport you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Jewel Changi Airport for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Breakjan -- Breakjan (talk) 20:01, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
I am reverting your edit and I expect that you open a discussion and get consensus for your edits. If you continue to revert, I believe Oshwah needs to have a look.--DreamLinker (talk) 07:38, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
- Feinoa, DreamLinker - Vacancies are always open on Talk:Disneyland with the Death Penalty for new discussions. I hope to see you both there. ;-) ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 08:47, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Singapore Airlines
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Singapore Airlines you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of SounderBruce -- SounderBruce (talk) 07:00, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Singapore Airlines
The article Singapore Airlines you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Singapore Airlines for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of SounderBruce -- SounderBruce (talk) 07:21, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
Edit summaries
Hello, Feinoa,
I wanted to encourage you to communicate with other editors via user and article talk pages, rather than through edit summaries. Not all editors go back to read previous edit summaries in the page history before they make an edit and their abbreviated length means that comments can come across as irritated instead of as thoughtful responses. This is especially a danger when you are reverting another editor's edit. If you have a fundamental disagreement with an edit, please utilize the talk page to discuss it as you will likely get more editors involved in a discussion which is always helpful when you find yourself in a dispute. Liz Read! Talk! 05:37, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
Non-free content use
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. We always appreciate when users upload files. However, it appears that one or more of the files you have uploaded or added to a page, specifically Japan–Singapore relations, may fail our non-free policy. Most often, this involves editors uploading or using a copyrighted file of a living person. For other possible reasons, please read up on our Non-free criteria. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 21:33, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for March 8
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Leader of the Opposition (Singapore), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pritam Singh (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 16:40, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
March 2020
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, articles should not be moved, as you did to Misinformation related to the 2019–20 coronavirus pandemic, without good reason. They should have a name that is both accurate and intuitive. Wikipedia has some guidelines in place to help with this. Generally, a page should only be moved to a new title if the current name doesn't follow these guidelines. Also, if a page move is being discussed, consensus needs to be reached before anybody moves the page. If you would like to experiment with page titles and moving, please use the test Wikipedia. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. - MrX 🖋 14:53, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
Pleas stop moving pages without obtaining consensus
Feinoa: Please stop moving Misinformation related to the 2019–20 coronavirus pandemic. You can initiate a move request if you disagree with the title. See WP:RM. - MrX 🖋 11:55, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
ANI case
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding your behaviour. The thread is "I need help. A registered user keeps reverting my edits without any explanation and is threatening to block me". (2001:8003:4E6B:7F00:7530:104F:34EA:5761 (talk) 14:17, 15 March 2020 (UTC))
White privilege
Keep trying. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 31.205.36.100 (talk) 14:30, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
The article America flu has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
None of these articles even mentions the phrase "America[n] flu" and only one of them is even about influenza.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. R'n'B (call me Russ) 15:10, 20 March 2020 (UTC)