User talk:Fashunxpert

Fashunxpert, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Hi Fashunxpert! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like John from Idegon (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:01, 12 September 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Christopher John Rogers (December 20)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by S0091 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

His website, LinkedIn and Instagram are not reliable sources. The Cut is a solid source but the Vogue piece is minimal and largely what he says.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Christopher John Rogers and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

S0091 (talk) 16:41, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

October 2023[edit]

Hello, I'm Julietdeltalima. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Sustainable fashion seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, please ask the editors at WP:TEAHOUSE for a second opinion. Please read WP:PUFFERY and rewrite this completely if you want it to stay in the encyclopedia in any form. This was not an appropriate contribution to Wikipedia. Julietdeltalima (talk) 19:43, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I also noticed that you added or changed content in an article, L'eau d'Issey, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. Please provide a reliable source for this interpretation. Julietdeltalima (talk) 19:44, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

January 2024[edit]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Moschino, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Julietdeltalima (talk) 16:36, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Julietdeltalima the information is in the source that is cited in the previous sentence. I will go back and copypaste the citation now. Fashunxpert (talk) 18:02, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]