Jump to content

User talk:Evschweik

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

[edit]

Hello, Evschweik, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 01:35, 23 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not in source.

[edit]

New episodes that were listed on List of Steven Universe episodes are not shown on the source[1] that was provided. 64.121.53.75 (talk) 04:54, 19 August 2015 (UTC)64.121.53.75[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Disney Channel series, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jessie. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:30, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 4 January

[edit]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:19, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 5 January

[edit]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:22, 6 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 6 January

[edit]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:21, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 12 July

[edit]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:28, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 4 August

[edit]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:26, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

August 2016

[edit]
Stop icon

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. ~ Rob13Talk 01:40, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

[edit]

Information icon Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Alex|The|Whovian? 13:15, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

List of Steven Universe episodes

[edit]

Any kind of edit warring from you when protection expires will result in a lengthy block. --NeilN talk to me 03:46, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 13 September

[edit]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that some edits performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. They are as follows:

Please check these pages and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:20, 14 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Episode numbers on Steven Universe

[edit]

Do you think we should discuss it here instead of constantly reverting each other's edits? We both risk getting blocked for a long time.

Okay, the Crewniverse has stated numerous times that the shorts DO count as an episode. It may not have been the original plan while making the show, but it became the plan. The biggest example that proves this is "Bismuth" as many people from the Crewniverse have confirmed that this episode is the 99th and 100th episodes of the show. This includes creator Rebecca Sugar herself: [2][3][4]

Minecraft69 (talk) 18:35, 16 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, remember to use the four ~s to sign your name, otherwise I don't get notified that you have sent this message. I only just now realised I had this message.

I get that Bismuth was advertised as the 100th episode of Steven Universe. Other shows (such as Adventure Time) have shorts, and they have not been counted as an episode. My view is that they are a production code. Season 2 shorts make up 1031-058. Now, this makes the shorts technically episode 58, not episode 79, if we really are going to count the shorts as an episode.

Steven Universe Wikia actually does not count the shorts as an episode. Their order is "my version" of the Wikia page. And honestly, I prefer that version because it's more natural. 78 is followed by 79, not 80. It's also much less confusing that way. The jump from 78 to 80 is extremely jarring to me, and I'm sure it is for a few others as well. This is why I push the "other version", but also, because other shows like Adventure Time and Gravity Falls work this way too, where the shorts don't count as episode numbers, but rather production codes.

And then this leaves the question, where the heck do the season 4 shorts go?!

Minecraft69 (talk) 22:00, 16 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I guess for now the best thing to do is to see what happens. As you probably know the second set of shorts were recently released and we don't know if they will be considered an official episode. What I'm trying to say is, I'll revert the Wiki to the Steven Universe Wikia version. You are right when saying that it is more natural. Glad we talked this out, and if something else comes up regarding this issue, I'll be sure to talk to you.

~s Evschweik

Issues like this are always best worked out by talking things through. I'm glad we can finally put this to an end after 2 months (!). Edit wars are a waste of time. I apologise for wasting so much of your time by dabbling in them. We should have done this to begin with instead of almost getting ourselves blocked and wasting precious time in our lives :)

Do you think we should still leave a notation that the shorts count as a production code 1031-058?

EDIT: Also, I think the last 2 months have shown that we are both very strong-willed individuals amirite? XD

Thanks for talking,

Minecraft69 (talk) 22:28, 16 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Haha, no problem at all. We definitely should have talked this out from the start and we definitely are both strong-willed individuals. As for the production code, I think the notation is a good thing to have.

~s Evschweik

Train (band)

[edit]

Please stop changing the title back to the improper A Girl, A Bottle, A Boat. This directly goes against a Wikipedia policy, MOS:CAPS, that says besides the first letter, prepositions in proper nouns are not to be capitalised in titles. All other editors will come along and correct this title if you keep attempting to change it back, so there is no point in trying to fight about it, especially when your edits run counter to a policy. Ss112 00:31, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

[edit]

Hello, Evschweik. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback substitute (and apology)

[edit]

Hi, Evschweik! I just wanted to let you know that you have a new message here. I also wanted to apologize for the discussion starter being broken up into three edits, and for my clumsy attempt to let you know when I had finished composing the discussion starter. If you have any questions about this, please let me know. Thanks! Noah Kastin (talk) 08:06, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  1. ^ http://www.cartoonnetwork.com/video/steven-universe/episodes/season-2.html
  2. ^ https://twitter.com/rebeccasugar/status/761383919002480640?lang=en
  3. ^ http://rebeccasugar.tumblr.com/post/148468271848/colin-howard-bismuth-who-the-heck-is-that
  4. ^ http://rebeccasugar.tumblr.com/post/148461312318/neo-rama-wow-its-bismuth-i-havent-seen-her
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Evschweik&oldid=1050696432"