User talk:Evilgohan2/Archive 0

This is an archive of past discussions with User:Evilgohan2. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Welcome!

Hello, Evilgohan2, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Timrem 23:33, 21 October 2006 (UTC)

GOLDSRC Engine Games

If you use an article's History tab, you can often find out why something was removed from the edit notes. Scroll down to 3 September and you'll get your explanation. :-) --Tom Edwards 10:07, 18 September 2006 (UTC)

Ballad of Fallen Angels

Ballad of Fallen Angels has been proposed for deletion. An editor felt the subject might not be notable enough for an article. Please review Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability for the relevant concerns. An example of notability guidelines can be found at Wikipedia:Notability (websites). If you can improve the article to address these concerns, please do so.

If no one objects to the deletion within five days by removing the "prod" notice, the article may be deleted without further discussion. If you remove the prod notice, the deletion process will stop, but if an editor is still not satisfied that the article meets Wikipedia guidelines, it may be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion for consensus. NickelShoe (Talk) 23:03, 22 December 2006 (UTC)

Curtis Manning

Regular users cannot protect pages. If you want the article protected, make a request at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection ::mikm t 03:53, 16 January 2007 (UTC)

re your message. Placing the vprotected tag doesn't protect an article by itself. Only admins can do that. ::mikm t 03:56, 16 January 2007 (UTC)

I think you misunderstand me, I'm not saying you "shouldn't" protect a page. I'm saying that, as a regular user, you are completely unable to directly protect a page. ::mikm t 04:00, 16 January 2007 (UTC)

Anna Nicole Smith.

Why did you remove the citation needed tags I put in? They were not vandalism, as your edit summary said they were. Those tags need to be put in. You've reverted legimimate edits by myself and Persian Poet Gal. Acalamari 21:31, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

Response to Your Comment Left on My Talk Page: Yes it seems like it. My apologies for reverting any valid edits. I'm sure you did not mean to revert to incorrect versions.¤~Persian Poet Gal ^(talk) 21:35, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

'Response That's all right. It was an accident. Acalamari 21:38, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
I've had to do at least two reverts. As I said to Persian Poet Gal, the vandals are out in force. Acalamari 22:10, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

Please revert my report. I heard the information on TV. I guess it's incorrect. I'll stop.

I'm actually not sure exactly how it's unencyclopedic.. I just saw user:gracenotes revert it earlier. You can add it back if you want. Sorry, Danski14 22:57, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

That's all right. I took a break earlier too. Acalamari 23:52, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

		The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		For all your vandalism-fighting on the Anna Nicole Smith article earlier. Acalamari 03:53, 9 February 2007 (UTC)

You're welcome. Acalamari 20:16, 9 February 2007 (UTC)

Your VandalProof Application

Dear Evilgohan2,

Thank you for applying for VandalProof! (VP). As you may know, VP is a very powerful program, and in fact the just released 1.3 version has even more power. Because of this we must uphold strict protocols before approving a new applicant. Regretfully, I have chosen to decline your application at this time. The reason for this is that at this time you do not meet the minimum requirement of 250 edits to mainspace articles (see under main here). Please note it is nothing personal by any means, and we certainly welcome you to apply again soon. Thank you for your interest in VandalProof. Prodego ^talk 22:37, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

Response to Vickie Lynn Hogan.

I responded with: Yeah, it is. It's in my watchlist, and I've been reverting vandalism to it every two days or so. Acalamari 22:55, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

666Satan

hey, idk if your still in2 666Satan much anymore, but i designed a userbox if your interested in using it

above is what it looks like, and the template link for it,

peace,

-Ancientanubis 21:28, 11 March 2007 (UTC)

no prob, just tryin to spread the wealth and kinda get the userbox out there so ppl kno about it:P

need your opinion

A category created by you or to which you have significantly contributed is being considered for deletion, rename, move or merge in accordance with Wikipedia's Categories for Discussion policies . This does not mean that any of the userpages in the category will be deleted. They may, however, be recategorized.
Please share your thoughts on the matter at this category's entry on the User categories for discussion page.
VegaDark 00:42, 14 March 2007 (UTC)

please vote:) Ancientanubis 02:10, 14 March 2007 (UTC)

thanks for the support man, btw... what you think of the 666Satan page since me and rose have been workin on it???Ancientanubis 00:25, 15 March 2007 (UTC)

666Satan name change

hey, im thinking of going in for a name change of the 666 Satan article from O-Part Hunter back to 666 Satan.... if i sent in the proposal i was wondring if you'd be willin to stand by me for this vote... Ancientanubis 20:13, 15 March 2007 (UTC)

thank you, i'll be putting in the proposal some time within the next day or so and i'll let ya know when the proposal is up:)..Ancientanubis 00:18, 16 March 2007 (UTC)

the discussion is up (here)... please vote how you see fit......Ancientanubis 04:34, 16 March 2007 (UTC)

" Using your same logic, Pocket Monsters is known as Pokemon because the general fan-base knows it as such and would prefer it to be called such."

No, the million dollar question is: Will the fan base be the same now that the North American, British, and Australian everyman can now buy an official release? Also, the English-language edition of O-Parts is now at Volume 2 [1] WhisperToMe 17:38, 17 March 2007 (UTC)

Volume 3 will come out on April 10: http://www.viz.com/news/newreleases/index.php?d=200704
Volume 4 will come out on June 12: http://www.viz.com/news/newreleases/index.php?d=200706

WhisperToMe 17:39, 17 March 2007 (UTC)

- If I know how otaku think, they'll have already downloaded it and viewed it off the internet. Evilgohan2 00:34, 18 March 2007 (UTC)

Yeah, but I can't really gauge the popularity of 666 Satan with otaku. Oh, and Ancientanubis seems to be acting a bit loopy today... WhisperToMe 00:41, 18 March 2007 (UTC)

"**Bit of a personal attack there, no? Evilgohan2 00:32, 18 March 2007 (UTC)"

- - A lot of people make this mistake, Evilgohan. Anubis is not the first person to do this, nor will he be the last. WhisperToMe 05:21, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
thanks gohan, and thanks for your support... but personally, with the whole whisper thing, i dont really think i did anything wrong... i mean, i lost my coool yes, but most of what i said was truth in a sense.... but ya, thanks for the support...Ancientanubis 04:09, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

666 satan similarities and jazz

thanks, although i cant tell if your comments were directed towards me or the other guy, if they were directed towards him then thank you for explaining to him why what was represented there should be kept, and also i'd like to thank you for adding to the similarities as i have been meaning to add to them but i have just been swamped with working on the character, o-part list, and also a new possible angels & demons and 666 satan media sections(the media section is for getting ready for the anime that should be released towards the end of the year, ya kno for Seiyu, voice actors, theme songs and all that jazz and then also the angels and demons page becuase i've been thinking about expanding it for a while but i dont really wanna see it expaned on the main page, instead giving it it's own page and etc etc... but ya, thanks for the help and i'll see ya around....Ancientanubis, talk 20:28, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

hey, ik we're lookin for alot of things for the similarities of other series/naruto but it seems to be a little to big for being just a similarities section... any ideas??? Ancientanubis, talk 21:25, 19 April 2007 (UTC)

interesting... well any ideas what we should do, we already had some guy try 2 delete it all, but then he threw a couple of tags and i havent heard from him sense...Ancientanubis, talk 00:24, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

idkm just some drifter dush bag, i posted a few times on his tal page but he never responded......Ancientanubis, talk 02:44, 21 April 2007 (UTC)

drop down box's

hey, i've sense gotten fairely good with the little dropdown box's if your interested in gettin a few for your userpage... just FYI, peace Ancientanubis, talk 01:44, 10 May 2007 (UTC)

cool, well first off it depends on where you want them to be, if ya wanna do it your self then feel free to gut my userpage(in a sense) and just steal what you want... or if ya wanna kno specific things then i'll prob write them down right after i post this message:P....Ancientanubis, talk 01:48, 10 May 2007 (UTC)

ok, first off... if ya want it to be over on the right(like my userbox one) then you just need a simple

Userbox's
USER BOX'S HERE

which looks like this

{|class="messagebox small-talk collapsible"
!align="center"| Userbox's
|-
|style="background:#FFFAEE; font-size:100%; border:1px solid #CCC"|

USER BOX'S HERE
|}

to do the one i have on the left like so

contact info

e-mail
[email protected]

then you will have to put it in a table(i think the template for this is defaulted to the right and i cant find any other way to change it)

{| class="wikitable" width="11%"
|align=center |
{|class="messagebox small-talk collapsible"
!align="center"| contact info
|-
|style="background:#FFFAEE; font-size:100%; border:1px solid #CCC"|
{|class="messagebox small-talk collapsible collapsed"
!align="center"| e-mail
|-
|style="background:#FFFAEE; font-size:100%; border:1px solid #CCC"|
[email protected]
|}
|}

finally if you want to have somethin like i have on the very bottom, its basically the same as the first but you change one word

Userbox's
USER BOX'S HERE

which looks like this

{|class="messagebox medium-talk collapsible"
!align="center"| Userbox's
|-
|style="background:#FFFAEE; font-size:100%; border:1px solid #CCC"|

USER BOX'S HERE
|}

from what i can tell while inside the box's basically all wiki format is standard... tabs, numbering bullets, all of it... the only thing is that sometimes normal text doesnt wanna show up if ya put 2 collapsables together(one inside another) but are usually fine if its a userbox(at least for the small ones, i havent really tried it with the larger ones)... thats about all i can think of... hope you enjoy, let me kno if ya have any questions...Ancientanubis, talk 01:58, 10 May 2007 (UTC)

so any questions???? lol.....Ancientanubis, talk 03:47, 11 May 2007 (UTC)

lol, i got bored so i set up a nice lil mock-userpage for ya with dropdown included... let me kno what ya think (here)...Ancientanubis, talk 16:30, 11 May 2007 (UTC)

Need some help

yo gohan, if you could give me some help with this discussion i'd be greatly appreciated... thanks:)...Ancientanubis, talk 16:12, 12 May 2007 (UTC)

Verizon FiOS article

A tag has been placed on Verizon FiOS, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

CSD G11 - advertisement of services for Verizon FiOS; external links to Verizon website for pricing

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet very basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. →Lwalt^♦ talk 03:47, 19 June 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:YYHm2DVDCover1.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:YYHm2DVDCover1.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 20:29, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

User:Ksams42198

While his edits were somewhat disruptive, I'm not convinced he was a sockpuppet of Roitr. He wasn't adding any bad information, merely engaged in replacing existing images with his own redundant (and possibly incorrectly sourced) versions. Caerwine Caer’s whines 23:43, 3 July 2007 (UTC)

I'll let those who deal with such things on a regular basis make the final determination, but I thought I'd let you and the blocking admin know my opinion. Caerwine Caer’s whines 23:48, 3 July 2007 (UTC)

DC Meetup notice

Greetings. There is going to be a Washington DC Wikipedia meetup on next Saturday, July 21st at 5pm in DC. Since you are listed in Category:Wikipedians_in_Maryland, I thought I'd invite you to come. I'm sorry about the short notice for the meeting. Hopefully we'll do somewhat better in that regard next time. If you can't come but want to make sure that you are informed of future meetings be sure to list yourself under "but let me know about future events", and if you don't want to get any future direct notices \(like this one\), you can list yourself under "I'm not interested in attending any others either" on the DC meetup page.--Gmaxwell 00:27, 15 July 2007 (UTC)

just fyi

i may need your help with a new user GasSnake or Poison Oak, he's been doing ALOT of revamps of entire pages and uploading images incorrectly and what not w/o discussing the large amounts of information he is adding to the pages, basically tho i was wonderin if i could count on you to help me in possible discussions with him which may help cut down the major edits he's been makin... but ya, just message me back when you get this... thanks Ancientanubis, talk 02:44, 30 July 2007 (UTC)

wasn't what i was expecting, but thanks i guess:P, ya i was talkin with SotBS, who pointed out to me that he broke the 3RR rule, and i reluctantly reported it to VegaDark, i honestly wasn't hoping for it to turn out the way it has but i/we seem to not have been left with much of a choice... Ancientanubis, talk 04:04, 30 July 2007 (UTC)

I never broke the 3RR rule I have never changed a page to the way I wanted it 3 times in a row in a 24 hour period get off my case I don't read the rules I don't even know the rules and who the hell are you giving me a "First, Last, and Only Warning" Call them I don't care I didn't take the time out to read the rules it because I don't see what I say as vandalism if you want to talk about vandals talk about those dudes who delete everything off the Africa page and put the words "KKK KKK NIGGER NIGGERS NIGGERS" 46 times--GasSnake or Poison Oak 03:25, 3 August 2007 (UTC)

Gohan, i need your help, this is really stressing me out... this whole GasSnake thing is pushing me to the brink of insanity....Ancientanubis, talk 06:10, 3 August 2007 (UTC)

thanks man, i honestly feel like i was about to go and stick my head in my pool untill the bubbles stoped last night:P(thats how bad this convestation got, anyway.... hope all's goin well Ancientanubis, talk Editor Review 11:26, 3 August 2007 (UTC)

whoa I'm so scared of a guy who call himself the evil form of the lamest character in an anime that has a cult following of those over 20 in the 10,000's out of the whole world, in my opinion, and also calls them self twinkle....even if they ban me so what I can use my PSP or my wii or just go over to my friends house if they do to edit things I believe are valid points and opinions and made out of good faith--GasSnake or Poison Oak 00:21, 4 August 2007 (UTC)

I'm on Editor Review

I'm on Editor Review! please give me a review and pass it along to others that ya are friends with as i want ALOT of review, thanks Ancientanubis, talk Editor Review 06:32, 3 August 2007 (UTC)

possible wikiproject

btw, im thining of making a wikiproject for 666 Satan, and yes ik that normally individual animes and etc dont get there own project, but i feel that if there is a better colaboration among the people who frequently edit 666 Satan articles we wont have events like we had for the past few days... but ya, i was just wanting your opinion on the idea.... since the talk page is annoyin me cuz i despise waitin for that lil yellow box, if theres any way ya can IM me on AIM, YIM, MSN or somethin that'd be great, my contact info is on my userpage... if not just respond to my talk page(or just respond on it(talk page) either way:P....Ancientanubis, talk Editor Review 23:53, 3 August 2007 (UTC)

aight, theres a link for it here, you can throw your name in and have it under w/e you wanna do... BTW, i think i've calmed GasSnake down some(if not all) you can read it here and here, but ya, if you know of anything that needs to be added to any articles or what not, feel free to add it... Ancientanubis, talk Editor Review 04:05, 6 August 2007 (UTC)

lol, no problem(with the FUR), you should see the template i made for anythin for 666 Satan(here Ancientanubis, talk Editor Review 04:14, 6 August 2007 (UTC)

GasSnake

yes ik, i read that(and his sig, altho maybe for me it doesnt seem as bad seeing as i've finished the book:P), and although i do not agree nor support his comment about Twinkle, it was posted 2 days ago, i was also just looking at his contributes and realize he added onto a fairely controversial comment (here) on Sam's page, i feel like i've gotten him to be less hostel, but maybe im just hoping too much for the best for him, idk... its one of those things where you see alot of potential in someone, yet they dont really seem to want to help themselves (or something along the lines of that) i really want to see if i can get him to calm down in a sense, and realize that we all want the same thing for wiki ya kno??? instead of banning is there any way we can do probation or somethin like that(does wiki even have probation???)Ancientanubis, talk Editor Review 04:24, 6 August 2007 (UTC)

ya, i mean on one hand he appears to be comin closer to levelin out (in the sense of losin the wild streak) but then he jsut goes right back to it, im sure you can tell from my talk page that for a brief while(while both of us were on) that we had a fairely(if not very) civil discussion... he seems to have a sorta dr jekle/mr hyde kinda thing going on... idk tho, it just confuses me, Ancientanubis, talk Editor Review 04:36, 6 August 2007 (UTC)

btw, let me kno when/if you post it in the other incident area as i will be wanting to share my, somewhat neutral/confused opinion... Ancientanubis, talk Editor Review 04:44, 6 August 2007 (UTC)

ya, so i read... you didnt get to read one of the ones that kinda made me mad(@ least i dont think you have read it) here...it's just being a long and difficult journey with him... and unfortunately we're not outta the woods yet, Ancientanubis, talk Editor Review 04:50, 6 August 2007 (UTC)

ya, but thats what i call karma(you download a ripped DVD, and they ruin a book for ya) comin back to bite ya... but yes, i will be posting my opinion from both sides of the board... Ancientanubis, talk Editor Review 05:10, 6 August 2007 (UTC)

ya so i've seen.... i think i may post a messave over on the Dark Knight Talk page askin them to keep an eye out for an IP address/new user who is heavily participating just so we may see if he's tryin 2 do a start over kinda thing... btw, u should make the 2 on ur sig a link to your talk page:P Ancientanubis, talk Editor Review 20:49, 9 August 2007 (UTC)

new sig

let me see the new sig when you get it lookin right... peace, Ancientanubis, talk Editor Review 05:33, 6 August 2007 (UTC)

nice, altho you need to add a link to your talk page(it will amuse me so i command it:P)Ancientanubis, talk Editor Review 05:38, 6 August 2007 (UTC)

ps, comment on my editors review, Ancientanubis, talk Editor Review 05:38, 6 August 2007 (UTC), and be honest

pss, and sams too foo:P, Ancientanubis, talk Editor Review 05:40, 6 August 2007 (UTC)

ya, i dont blame ya, but i actually thought the same when i did sam's... but i actually found it fairely easy once i got goin(Wikipedia:Editor_review/Sam_ov_the_blue_sand), but idk, just lookin for a general consensus on what people think i need to improve as an editor/user on wiki, Ancientanubis, talk Editor Review 05:44, 6 August 2007 (UTC)

btw, i gave GasSnake a link to the Admin noticeboard piece on him, as it'd be extremely rude not to give him a chance to defend his self/give his opinion.... Ancientanubis, talk Editor Review 05:46, 6 August 2007 (UTC)

thanks for the edit, i've been tryin 2 do that with all the signings but i come across(@ least new ones:P) guess i missed one tho, Ancientanubis, talk Editor Review 05:48, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

WP:CVU status

The Wikipedia:Counter-Vandalism Unit project is under consideration to be moved to {{inactive}} and/or {{historical}} status. Another proposal is to delete or redirect the project. You have been identified as a project member and your input as to this matter would be welcomed at WT:CVU#Inactive.3F and at the deletion debate. Thank you! Delivered on behalf of xaosflux 15:58, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

3/4

Good job you got it right you just won a million dollars ^_^. Good job though figuring it out.Sam ov the blue sand, Editor Review 16:06, 12 August 2007 (UTC)

V.F.D. reversion

I respectfully disagree with your decision to revert my edit of the V.F.D. article. In my opinion, the change accurately reflected the contents of the series in question. 24.17.171.84 09:05, 16 August 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:666 Satan.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:666 Satan.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 19:52, 17 August 2007 (UTC)

THE MANDOGS

Why have you been removing my modifications to the article on The Mandogs? I am trying to correct the information and you just deleted an hours work. Stop being a vandal.

220.237.37.165 05:46, 18 August 2007 (UTC)

Still here

Was up and I'm not changing jack-GasSnake or Poison Oak 06:21, 18 August 2007 (UTC)

removeal of LONG title to shrink TOC

Bold and extremism of poor spelling and grammar as well as plethora of exclamation points is unnecessary. Also, its done that was just my way of tryin 2 remind my self to do it:P, as we can all see tho it didnt work out too well, thanks for uploadin it tho, Ancientanubis, talk Editor Review 05:53, 19 August 2007 (UTC)