User talk:Everyoneis1

Everyoneis1, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi Everyoneis1! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Ushau97 (I'm a Teahouse host) Visit the Teahouse This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:07, 21 June 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Muawiyah Shatnawi

The article Muawiyah Shatnawi has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article. The nominator also raised the following concern:

sources should be in english

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Stewart of Appin ~ Follow the Bonnie Prince! 15:55, 24 June 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Rabia Ezzadin

Hello, Everyoneis1. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Rabia Ezzadin, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

1. edit the page
2. remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
3. save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Mr. Guye (talk) 16:27, 24 June 2014 (UTC)

Please Accept My Apologies

To all members of Wikipedia that have been involved in this case, especially (User talk:Magioladitis), (User talk:Callanecc), and (User talk:Bgwhite): I'm sincerely sorry for everything: I want to apologize for always giving you guys a hard time with my edits and contributions to any articles here on Wikipedia regarding Jordanian footballers and teams and I sincerely apologize for always ignoring your rules and warnings. I admit I was being selfish, thought I could always get away with it and always have it my way, as well as being too lazy to listen to any of you by ignoring the reasons you provide me as to why some of my edits violate the rules here on this website and ignoring your warnings. I apologize for my rude and selfish behavior. I just wanted to help, and I thought I could by adding more links and references to such articles, but I seriously did not know that using double brackets and this | in the links and references I add was a violation, I thought it wouldn't matter. With all due respect, what's the big deal with that exactly, what harm could be done? Is it only because it's totally unnecessary or what? And what's wrong with providing Arabic links and references here on Wikipedia? I mean, there are lots of articles here on Wikipedia, besides ones regarding Jordanian footballers, that include Arabic links and references. The only reason why I like to provide Arabic links and references to articles of Jordanian footballers here on Wikipedia is because they are the only ones that back up the information of these footballers and make a lot of sense, and there are hardly any English ones out there that help back up the info. Trust me, the Arabic ones are much better because they contain much more, or better yet, all sources of the info I provide. So I provide these links and references as sources to back up the info I provide. And as for all the Facebook links I've been trying to provide for the past few months, which I have also just removed myself for the past few days after I found out why providing certain Facebook links is inappropriate here on Wikipedia, I thought it was completely fine to do that after I saw Lionel Messi's Facebook page provided as a link on an article of him here on Wikipedia, so I thought I could help by doing the same to articles of Jordanian footballers here on Wikipedia, and I thought it wouldn't matter, in fact I thought the same was allowed to be done for any article here on Wikipedia of a footballer. So if it's really the links and references you guys have a problem with, just remove them yourselves from now on without having to revert my recent edits, like manually. As for me, I promise to never ever do this again. I really didn't mean to cause you guys any trouble with all I've been doing, I just wanted to help because I enjoy doing this, and I've been doing all this because I'm the one who created most articles/pages here on Wikipedia of Jordanian footballers, national teams, and clubs and improved all others created by other people. You see, I used to be the only one here on Wikipedia who had access to all the information of Jordanian footballers and teams until I tried to help everyone else here on Wikipedia, like readers and members, giving them access to this information by providing it here on Wikipedia.

So as of for now and from now on, please accept and leave my recent edits and contributions that I have made for the past few days because they are all now totally accurate and I tried to make it easier for you guys by removing Facebook links and the | symbols from the references I've been providing. Will you guys please forgive me, not get me into anymore trouble and not try to stop me from contributing by blocking me. Please let's just forget about all this and allow me to continue contributing because I want to help, is that so wrong? :(

Thank you for your cooperation :)

Why have I been blocked (indefinitely) again?! I didn't do anything wrong this time, all of my edits and contributions are clean and harmless.

You have not been blocked again. You were blocked indefinitely on 20 March 2014, and that block has not been lifted. Your original account, Yalladar (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), was blocked for two editing conduct issues and then blocked indefinitely because you kept creating and abusing multiple accounts. Thus, any time you create a new account, that account will be blocked—the block isn't placed on the account but on you as an editor, and you have not successfully appealed the block of your master account. Thus, each time you create a new account, not only does your new account look bad, but it reflects bad on you and decreases the likelihood that you'll get unblocked.

If you want unblocked, you'll need to petition for unblocking with your master account. Frankly, at this point, no administrator is likely to unblock you now because of your history of abusing multiple accounts. Your best option at this point is to follow the standard offer: wait six months (from today's date—each sockpuppetry incident resets the clock), then make an unblock request that shows that you understand why you were blocked and that you're willing to edit within compliance to Wikipedia rules (including the verifiability rules requiring reliable sources and football project guidelines that say not to count goals or caps from friendly matches in totals). —C.Fred (talk) 12:02, 25 June 2014 (UTC)

Thank you C.Fred and Bgwhite for responding, and again I'm sorry you guys had to go through all that trouble, but still I tried to make it easier for you guys this time by removing unnecessary and inappropriate links and references such as ones that are no longer available and such as the ones I used to add myself like those Facebook ones, and I have also been removing these | symbols and those extra brackets from those links and references I tag. And as for the sources I've been using as references to articles of Jordanian footballers, I already told you guys that I only like to use Arabic ones because they are the only ones available online; I can only find Arabic sources relating to Jordanian footballers and they contain (almost) all the information that can be used as references to the information of Jordanian footballers that I provide here on this website. There are hardly any English ones I can use; there are hardly any available online and the only ones I can find contain very little and somewhat inaccurate information. This why I prefer to only provide Arabic ones, because they mostly contain all the information that can be used as references, and there also very detailed and specific. So what if the references I provide are in another language, if anyone here on Wikipedia, whether he/she is an administrator or just a reader, checks out these articles of Jordanian footballers, as well as their references which are in Arabic but can't read, understand, or just doesn't know any Arabic, then that's his/her problem. If this sort of thing is such a big harm and violates Wikipedia's rules and policies, then how come some people who do the same thing as me don't get in trouble for that? I say that's not fair, and not just for me but for everyone else who faces similar injustices.

And when it comes to keeping track of the number of matches/caps played and number of goals scored by Jordanian footballers, I know what I'm doing; I don't mean to brag but I'm actually right because I actually watch the players' matches myself and keep track of information like that everyday. Sometimes the English sources provided, like [nationalfootballteams.com] and [soccerway.com] lack a lot of that information, as well as contain some inaccurate ones. That's why I don't like to use links when it comes to keeping track of the number of matches/caps played and number of goals scored by Jordanian footballers. Why would I provide any false information of Jordanian footballers and teams? That's stupid! I mean if it weren't for me, we wouldn't even have any of this information, most articles of Jordanian footballers, national teams, and clubs wouldn't exist if it weren't for me. You see, Wikipedia used to lack almost all this information until 2011 when I started creating more articles of Jordanian footballers, national teams, and clubs and adjusting or improving all other ones that have already been created by others here on Wikipedia. How can I be wrong and why would I even lie?! I'm a huge fan of Jordanian football and I know everything about stuff like this or anything relating to this, I know more than everyone else here on Wikipedia about stuff like this. And I tried to help and do the right thing by providing readers access to all that information I provide with those references I add.

How about a compromise, let's make a deal:

If you guys could just please recover all of my articles that you have recently deleted and undo all of your edit reverts because I worked really hard on those, I will stop making edits here on Wikipedia for the next 6 months. Well sure I'll have to wait that long, but at least I won't cause you guys anymore trouble, I promise.

Please I'm begging you and forgive me :(

Oh, where to begin...

1. "removing...references such as ones that are no longer available" is inappropriate. Just because a reference is no longer available online doesn't invalidate it as a reference. That's why we have the {{dead link}} template to flag references with dead links.
2. "and such as the ones I used to add myself like those Facebook ones". If you've been removing Facebook links from references, that's a good thing: Facebook is generally not a reliable source.
3. " I have also been removing these | symbols and those extra brackets from those links and references I tag". Are you sure the formatting should be removed?
4. " This why I prefer to only provide Arabic ones, because they mostly contain all the information that can be used as references, and there also very detailed and specific." Not necessarily a problem, but you may need to demonstrate that the Arabic-language source is reliable. Further, if they include statistics that are generally not included by the football Wikiproject, like caps and goals in friendlies, you'd need to adjust the data.
5. "I actually watch the players' matches myself and keep track of information like that everyday." Articles should not contain original research. This is one of those areas where we prefer a published source to somebody's personal tally. Plus, if there aren't published sources, that's a sign that the subject isn't notable. (The general notability guidelines use the existence of published sources as a benchmark for notability.)

As for consideration of your offer, I looked at your last edit, which was to Shabab Al-Ordon Club. Before your edit, the coaching staff agreed to what was on the club's website; your changes went away from what was published. While it's possible that the club just hasn't updated the website, unless you can show a reliable source where the manager has been replaced, we need to go with what is on the website as the best available published source. So, I'm certainly not willing to take personal responsibility for remaking that edit, nor would I make any of the other ones. I wouldn't count on any other editor taking responsbility for them.

As for the unblock, let me be direct:

This account will not be unblocked.

Its block is for abuse of multiple accounts. Any request for an unblock may only be made at User talk:Yalladar while you are logged into that account. That account is blocked for a history of abuse of multiple accounts (including this one). So, your unblock request there, in addition to everything I've mentioned above, will need to demonstrate that you understand the policies governing multiple accounts and agree to abide by them. —C.Fred (talk) 19:13, 25 June 2014 (UTC)