User talk:Evercloser

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Please do not add unreferenced controversial biographical information concerning living persons to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Brock University Students' Union. Thank you. Andy Saunders 00:25, 27 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unreferenced controversial biographical content to articles, as you did at Brock University Students' Union. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. While your email to me was received, the interests of Wikipedia take much greater precedence on Wikipedia than any possible interests of the students of Brock University. Andy Saunders 01:55, 27 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced defamatory content into an article, as you did to Brock University Students' Union, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. I must reiterate that while your intentions do appear to be honourable, Wikipedia is categorically NOT the forum to be posting this information - not until it has been reported upon by other public parties. Wikipedia is not a primary source of information, it is a secondary one. Information must be able to be verified and sourced before appearing in Wikipedia. Andy Saunders 16:08, 27 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your email to me regarding mediation[edit]

I received your email regarding a mediation request. I invite you to begin the process, I will gladly agree to this; however, since you are the one requesting mediation, I feel that you should begin the process. Andy Saunders 16:15, 27 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked[edit]

I have blocked you indefinitely (at least for the timebeing). Please read Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons. Notwithstanding any other Wikipedia policy and guideline, negative information regarding living persons is absolutely not allowed without very good and robust sources. If you have quality newspapers you can source your info to, it may be allowed to go in.

I have no opinion personally on any of the material you have added nor any connection to the subject in question. This is enforcement of Wikipedia policy that any administrator would undertake. Marskell 17:31, 27 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Brock University Students' Union. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brock University Students' Union. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:13, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]