User talk:Eumat114/Archive 5
 | This is an archive of past discussions with User:Eumat114. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 | ← | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 | → | Archive 10 |
Jayvijay Sachan
Please help to get publish Jayvijay Sachan to mainspace. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mamaharyaindia (talk • contribs) 13:38, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
- Mamaharyaindia, please keep it on just one talk page. User:JavaHurricane is the one who declined your draft, not me. If you'd like to ask for advice, WP:TEA is the right place. Cheers, Eumat114 formerly The Lord of Math (Message) 08:33, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
DYK nomination of Yan Kingdom (Three Kingdoms)
Hello! Your submission of Yan Kingdom (Three Kingdoms) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Alex2006 (talk) 14:29, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
List of reviewers by subject
The page looks awesome and is way better looking than I could have made it. Thanks! Sulfurboy (talk) 08:32, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
Corrections to draft article 'Peter Stanton'
Hi,
Just letting you know that i'm happy with your recent corrections to my Draft article 'Peter Stanton'.
Thank you.
Gilpin b (talk) 12:22, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
- Gilpin b, thanks for your kind words! Eumat114 formerly The Lord of Math (Message) 12:23, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
Uma medalha para você!
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
|
A Medalha da Civilidade |
| Thank you for the correction tips in our articles, we don't know how to use this right here and we are looking forward to the approval because almost two months, we are waiting ... good job! Marcusllehmanbrz (talk) 13:52, 27 April 2020 (UTC) |
Peter Stanton / (James) Peter Stanton Duplication
Hi, sorry if i'm posting this in the wrong place i'm still learning to navigate the messaging interface here.
Regarding the question about the duplication, of the Peter Stanton (James Peter Stanton) yes it appears to be. Apologies, I had originally drafted that page a few months ago but I thought i had deleted it (at the time it didn't seem to have been viewed by any editors at all and after a few Non-Wikipedia Wikis had copied the information from the drafts section and posted it directly into their pages I thought i'd can it)
I decided to recommence the process yesterday but had no idea that it was still there - apologies for any confusion, i much prefer the current iteration you've helped out on in any case!
Gilpin b (talk) 03:50, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
- Gilpin b, no problems! would you want that duplicate deleted? Also, is "Peter" his first or middle name? Thx Eumat114 formerly The Lord of Math (Message) 03:52, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
- I've just had that draft procedurally declined. Cheers, Eumat114 formerly The Lord of Math (Message) 03:55, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
Yes thanks, please delete it. His name is James Peter Stanton but he goes by the name of Peter Stanton.
Cheers
Gilpin b (talk) 04:00, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
- Gilpin b, thanks for clearing up the confusion! Have a good day, and stay safe! Eumat114 formerly The Lord of Math (Message) 04:03, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
Peter Stanton
Hi, Thanks for your help with this page!
Just a quick question regarding: the latest edit you did before moving it to the main articles area.
In the body of the article it reads:
"He carried out assessments in several national parks in Queensland, causing the protection many threatened natural habitats throughout the state within a large new area of National Parks."
For the sake of historical accuracy i'm wondering if you (or I) can edit it to say:
"He carried out his assessments in a wide range of dissimilar Queensland landscapes which lead to the protection many threatened natural habitats throughout the state within a large new area of National Parks."
The reason i'm asking for the change is that none of these threatened areas were National Parks at the time that he conducted his assessments.
Please let me know what you think.
Cheers
Gilpin b (talk) 04:28, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
- Gilpin b, please feel free to do so. I have a limited understanding of Australia, and thanks for the correction! Eumat114 formerly The Lord of Math (Message) 04:43, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Template:Public transport in Hong Kong has been accepted
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Template-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thanks again, and happy editing!
Bkissin (talk) 13:47, 29 April 2020 (UTC)WikiCup 2020 May newsletter
The second round of the 2020 WikiCup has now finished. It was a high-scoring round and contestants needed 75 points to advance to round 3. There were some very impressive efforts in round 2, with the top ten contestants all scoring more than 500 points. A large number of the points came from the 12 featured articles and the 186 good articles achieved in total by contestants, and the 355 good article reviews they performed; the GAN backlog drive and the stay-at-home imperative during the COVID-19 pandemic may have been partially responsible for these impressive figures.
Our top scorers in round 2 were:
Epicgenius, with 2333 points from one featured article, forty-five good articles, fourteen DYKs and plenty of bonus points
Gog the Mild, with 1784 points from three featured articles, eight good articles, a substantial number of featured article and good article reviews and lots of bonus points
The Rambling Man, with 1262 points from two featured articles, eight good articles and a hundred good article reviews
Harrias, with 1141 points from two featured articles, three featured lists, ten good articles, nine DYKs and a substantial number of featured article and good article reviews
Lee Vilenski with 869 points, 
Hog Farm with 801, 
Kingsif with 719, 
SounderBruce with 710, 
Dunkleosteus77 with 608 and 
MX with 515.
.svg){kind=small}
The rules for featured article reviews have been adjusted; reviews may cover three aspects of the article, content, images and sources, and contestants may receive points for each of these three types of review. Please also remember the requirement to mention the WikiCup when undertaking an FAR for which you intend to claim points. Remember also that DYKs cannot be claimed until they have appeared on the main page. As we enter the third round, any content promoted after the end of round 2 but before the start of round 3 can be claimed now, and anything you forgot to claim in round 2 cannot! Remember too, that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them. When doing GARs, please make sure that you check that all the GA criteria are fully met.
If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article nominations, a featured process, or anything else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13 (talk), Sturmvogel 66 (talk), Vanamonde (talk) and Cwmhiraeth. - MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:45, 1 May 2020 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – May 2020
News and updates for administrators from the past month (April 2020).
Administrator changes
CheckUser changes
Oversight changes
Guideline and policy news
- Discretionary sanctions have been authorized for all pages and edits related to COVID-19, to be logged at WP:GS/COVID19.
- Following a recent discussion on Meta-Wiki, the edit filter maintainer global group has been created.
- A request for comment has been proposed to create a new main page editor usergroup.
- A request for comment has been proposed to make the bureaucrat activity requirements more strict.
Technical news
- The Editing team has been working on the talk pages project. You can review the proposed design and share your thoughts on the talk page.
- Enterprisey created a script that will show a link to the proper Special:Undelete page when viewing a since-deleted revision, see User:Enterprisey/link-deleted-revs.
Miscellaneous
- A request for comment closed with consensus to create a Village Pump-style page for communication with the Wikimedia Foundation.
Hi Eumat114. Yan Kingdom (Three Kingdoms) has been posted at GoCE with a request for a copy edit. I started this by correcting the dashes to be MoS compliant and you reverted. I am aware that you are the main author and not the requester, so can I ask you to confirm whether of not you would like the article copy editing? Thanks. Gog the Mild (talk) 13:00, 2 May 2020 (UTC)
- Gog the Mild, yes, and thanks. I discussed with the requester and the requester helped me start a request. I then saw that you were using the tool and, having just installed it, decided to try it out by reverting your edit and doing it with my newly installed dash-filler tool (the same one). It seemed not to be working; hence, I un-undid my changes. Thanks for helping me CE the article! Eumat114 formerly TLOM (Message) 13:03, 2 May 2020 (UTC)
- Fair enough. Copy edit finished. A nice little article. Feel free to revert anything you don't like or which I have got wrong, or to ping me if there are any changes you don't understand. Gog the Mild (talk) 14:11, 2 May 2020 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:26, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
AfC notification: Draft:Fujian–Taiwan relationships has a new comment
Draft:Phractura bovei
I added more stuff on the Phractura bovei draft. Could you please look at it? User0614 (talk) 19:38, 4 May 2020 (UTC)
"CFA building" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect CFA building. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 May 4#CFA building until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. signed, Rosguill talk 21:23, 4 May 2020 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Fujian–Taiwan relationships has been accepted
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a fantastic rating for a new article, and places it among the top 3% of accepted submissions — major kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thanks again, and happy editing!
-- RoySmith (talk) 13:41, 5 May 2020 (UTC)