User talk:EsmereldaIsTrans

September 2022

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Proto-Indo-Europeans, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Mako001 (C)  (T)  🇺🇦 04:12, 29 September 2022 (UTC)

The reason I removed it was because it was an OPINION f a historical linguist on the subject of ancient population genetics. Is this not a valid reason? Opinions are not definitions. EsmereldaIsTrans (talk) 04:59, 1 October 2022 (UTC)

'Proto-Indo-Europeans' are an hypothetical culture, not an archaeogenetic lineage.  Tewdar  09:52, 2 October 2022 (UTC)

October 2022

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Proto-Indo-Europeans, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. — Moops ^⋠T⋡ 00:34, 2 October 2022 (UTC)

The reason I removed it was because it was an OPINION of a historical linguist on the subject of ancient population genetics. Is this not a valid reason? Opinions are not definitions EsmereldaIsTrans (talk) 00:38, 2 October 2022 (UTC)

Again, the subject is not 'ancient population genetics', per se.  Tewdar  09:53, 2 October 2022 (UTC)

April 2023

Hello, I'm Miner Editor. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Stavros Halkias—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Miner Editor (talk) 12:45, 10 April 2023 (UTC)

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did with this edit to Stavros Halkias. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Miner Editor (talk) 12:50, 10 April 2023 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Courcelles (talk) 17:41, 12 April 2023 (UTC)