User talk:ErrantX/Archive/2016/December
![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
The Bugle: Issue CXXVIII, December 2016
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 14:09, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
File:What cd.png listed for discussion
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/2/28/Information.svg/30px-Information.svg.png)
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:What cd.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:44, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
Hi
what seems like a lifetime ago (6 years or so maybe less) I had a real life conversation with kiril about which of the projects (espionage or intelligence) should survive a mash up, and all these years later I find this very weird intel task force that cannot even be identified in talk page tags... thats life I suppose. If you are on the list of participants:
- how come not a talk page for task force?
- how come such pre-literate coding? surely it doesnt take much for someone to help out and show up the task force?
It is of some interest that no one has bothered even to remove the duplication where espionage and intelligence banners on talk pages have even the need to be cleaned up... My sincere apology if this seems somewhat onerous a query at this time, please re-direct me to someone else. Thanks. Have a safe festive season. JarrahTree 09:50, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
- I'l be honest; I stuck my name on the intelligence task force page once because it seemed like a good way to find collaborators. But it's a dead project... My interests are very narrow and specialised (and largely not espionage). I suppose it's arguable that intelligence (in the military context) and espionage are related, but not identical, topics, there are divergent interests; e.g. military encryption/decryption or corporate espionage. As to why no one has cleaned it up - well most people work, like me, it seems on tiny portions of the topic... so little bits are tidy, the whole is a mess. You get no argument from me over tidying up a spectrum of pages! --Errant (chat!) 13:12, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
very sinceree apologies I should have engaged you on the subject - thank you very much for your speedy reply - it seems to always die (intelligence, espionage) - and your point is very correct espionage should not have subsumed the other - in reality they both should have become task forces of something else and kept separate - but it looks like the milhist one went nowhere as well - oh well have a safe christmas - maybe in the new year I will try to go down the road of what seems to have taken years to unravel but never solve the mess JarrahTree 14:14, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
The Signpost: 22 December 2016
- Year in review: Looking back on 2016
- News and notes: Strategic planning update; English ArbCom election results
- Special report: German ArbCom implodes
- Featured content: The Christmas edition
- Technology report: Labs improvements impact 2016 Tool Labs survey results
- Traffic report: Post-election traffic blues
- Recent research: One study and several abstracts
Operation Ironside for TFA
This is to let you know that the Operation Ironside article has been scheduled as today's featured article for 8 January 2017. If you're interested in editing the main page text, you're welcome to do so at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/January 8, 2017. Thanks! Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 12:26, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 00:41, 24 December 2016 (UTC)