User talk:Endocytosis

Welcome!

Hello, Endocytosis, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page List of child prodigies did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or in other media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask a question on your talk page. Again, welcome. HaeB (talk) 05:57, 23 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

September 2018

Please refrain from making major edits on Wikipedia pages such as those you made to Jodie Foster, without first discussing your changes on the article's talk page, Your edit(s) require discussion to establish consensus as this is considered a major change. Your edits do not appear to have been discussed and have been reverted. Thank you. - FlightTime (open channel) 15:01, 24 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Endocytosis, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Endocytosis! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like John from Idegon (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 24 September 2018 (UTC)

Jodie Foster

You are to have to open a discussion on the article talk page and seek consensus for inclusion of Becky Thatcher, this list you're adding to is for notabile films. You just can not add a film because you like it, hence the discussion. Becky Thatcher will not be allowed to stay without this discussion and you'll be wasting your's and our time. Cheers, - FlightTime (open channel) 15:35, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

September 2018

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to change genres without discussion or sources, as you did at The Silence of the Lambs (film), you may be blocked from editing. The Old Jacobite_{The '45} 23:42, 27 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at The Silence of the Lambs (film), you may be blocked from editing. - FlightTime (open channel) 11:35, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Jodie Foster. - FlightTime Phone (open channel) 14:28, 30 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Jodie Foster

As a previously added that Jodie Foster's portrayal of Clarice Starling is ranked by AFI as the greatest heroine, I added the source but still it was removed, may I have an explanation for that Endocytosis (talk) 14:34, 30 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

What is your source for this information ? Please provide a link to this source. - FlightTime Phone (open channel) 14:42, 30 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Jodie Foster

^[1] Endocytosis (talk) 14:46, 30 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

References

^ AFI. "AFI's 100 YEARS...100 HEROES & VILLAINS". Retrieved 20 September 2011.

October 2018

Hello, I'm Nathan2055. Your recent edit to the page Kevin Spacey appears to have added incorrect information, so it has been removed for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Nathan2055^{talk - contribs} 21:04, 6 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Kangana Ranaut shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 11:37, 9 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at The Silence of the Lambs (film). The Old Jacobite_{The '45} 13:33, 19 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Tallulah (film). 75.182.115.183 (talk) 18:59, 21 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

FINAL WARNING: Unsourced content and other disruptive editing

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at A Star Is Born (1976 film). 75.182.115.183 (talk) 14:50, 22 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

November 2018

You are suspected of sock puppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, then, if you wish to do so, respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/RDX451. Thank you. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 19:28, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Riker Lynch. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Geraldo Perez (talk) 15:29, 9 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Floquenbeam (talk) 16:37, 9 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This is a collaborative project

You have not responded to any of the notices left above, and are continuing to add unsourced content into BLPs in spite of around a dozen notes about it. i am blocking this account until you respond, and indicate in a convincing way that you are going to stop. --Floquenbeam (talk) 16:39, 9 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Endocytosis. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Endocytosis, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Krimuk2.0 (talk) 09:49, 5 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

[1] AFI. "AFI's 100 YEARS...100 HEROES & VILLAINS". Retrieved 20 September 2011.

[1]