User talk:Empirical1

Recent edits to Breathwork

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Breathwork, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 10:04, 15 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

October 2015

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Breathwork has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Breathwork was changed by Empirical1 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.892609 on 2015-10-15T10:19:16+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 10:19, 15 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Warning

Empirical1, Materialscientist wrote a nice polite message to you above, to explain why he reverted your edit, but you have simply re-reverted him, without supplying any sources or any explanation. Please don't persist, or you will eventually be blocked from editing. Bishonen | talk 10:32, 15 October 2015 (UTC).[reply]

Recent edit to Breathwork

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you removed some content from Breathwork without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 10:59, 15 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

October 2015

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for edit warring, as you did at Breathwork. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Bishonen | talk 12:08, 15 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]