User talk:ElderScrolls6

The recent edit you made to N4G constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ElderScrolls7 (talk • contribs) 21:54, 29 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at N4G. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. ElderScrolls7 (talk) 22:59, 29 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, ElderScrolls6, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Introduction

5 The five pillars of Wikipedia

How to edit a page

Help

Tips

How to write a great article

Manual of Style

Fun stuff...

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! benzband (talk) 10:26, 12 April 2012 (UTC) benzband (talk) 10:26, 12 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Need a hand?

Hello! ElderScrolls6, you're invited to join other new editors and friendly hosts in the Teahouse – an awesome place to meet people, ask questions, and learn more about Wikipedia. Please join us! benzband (talk) 10:28, 12 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

June 2012

Unfortunately, there are problems with your editing. You have been accused of "vandalism", but I believe that is a mistake, as I see no reason to think that you are not acting in good faith, without realising that your editing, with this and other accounts, violates several Wikipedia policies and guidelines. You have repeatedly added highly contentious content to an article without providing sources to support your claims. You have attempted to impose your own point of view on the article, instead of writing from a neutral point of view. You have attempted to use Wikipedia to promote a campaign against an organisation. You have edit warred to try to force your opinion through, instead of discussing the issues and trying to reach consensus. In addition, I suggest that you stick to one account. It is not forbidden to have more than one, but unless there is a good reason for it, your use of multiple accounts is likely to confuse people, by making it difficult for them to see your full editing history, and see your edits in context. JamesBWatson (talk) 15:47, 30 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Additional

Hi, could you explain this edit please? Why have you taken it upon yourself to remove a huge chunk of another editors talk page? Chaheel Riens (talk) 06:53, 1 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps I was wrong. That does look like vandalism. If it wasn't then please do explain it, or you may well be blocked from editing. JamesBWatson (talk) 12:25, 1 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]