User talk:Eldar Featel

Welcome!

Hello, Eldar Featel, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --Slgr@ndson (page - messages - contribs) 18:22, 6 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Brioschi.jpeg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Brioschi.jpeg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 08:01, 13 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

9813×3281???[edit]

I see that you have uploaded a picture of [Image:Fpsengine.jpg|FPS Engine history]. But, the resolution was 9813×3281!!! That's way to high! If you are the original creater then redo the picture and keep it under 3840×2400 (WQUXGA - the largest display standard). You should be able to fit everything and more in that size. I scaled the picture as a quick fix, but the picture is now slightly fuzzy. -- (Jdm64 19:42, 13 August 2006 (UTC))[reply]

One problem might be the software that you're using - ms visio! If that's the kind of output it's giving (extreme resolution) then I would strongly sugest using somthing else! Because 9,813 pixels is way to wide. Most people have monitors at 1024×768 or 1280×1024 and rarely anything higher. At 9,813 it's almost imposable to visulize the corralation of the different "blocks" of text (or what ever you'd call them) because you can only see a few at a time. I liked your FPS history picture, but because of th extreme resoultion I had no idea what was going on. There is no reason for extreme resolution because I know that you can still read text if it's smaller. I sugest free and open source software; including:

OpenOffice.org Draw - part of OpenOffice.org.
Inkscape - A vector graphics editor that can save to PNG and I think jpg.
GIMP - An image editor that can do boxes, lines, and text.
Kivio - like ms visio, but for Linux and KDE.

Sorry if I'm rambling. -- Jdm64 16:10, 14 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You can produce stupidly large output in any program - it's not a Visio issue. The Wikimedia servers and most browsers are capable of scaling graphics for viewing, and thanks to the lower resolution (and, to be fair, the inappropriate JPEG format), the image was impossible for someone without a knowledge of the subject matter to read in places at the lower resolution. I can't see how this diagram could possibly fit into WXGA without either losing some of the content or making it illegible, personally. Stannered 14:50, 27 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Politecnico di Milano[edit]

Hi, thanks for dropping me a note. Go ahead, I'll watch and suggest improvements :) --Raistlin 10:28, 15 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Good work, I don't see any major problem, I'll add information when I have time :) --Raistlin 14:56, 22 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I think you made a good work. Sorry for my late reply. :) --Lasah 12:03, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Brioschi image[edit]

Hi! I've uploaded an image of Francesco Brioschi and I've not specified the type of copyright so the OrphanBot notified me this problem. Now I don't exactly know the license on the image, but since it is a photo of a 19th century mathematician I suppose it is not protected by any copyright. I could reasonably insert that "the author has died more than 100 years ago" but I have not found the name of the author. Otherwise, what kind of license could I insert? Thanks! Bye! Eldar Featel 13:12, 13 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If the image was published before 1923, or published anywhere before 1909, then {{PD-US}} works. "Author died more than 100 years ago" is likely the case, but PD-US is easier to determine. --Carnildo 06:33, 16 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Nabassu[edit]

The redirect is gone; feel free to update the article with relevant and encyclopedic information. Some of the other demon pages reference the books in which the demon first appeared and provide information about their appearance and habits in those earlier incarnations; you may want to move in that direction. Just a thought. Captainktainer * Talk 21:40, 16 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your image Image:Fpsengine.jpg[edit]

I've SVGised this diagram to Image:Fpsengine.svg. I'd appreciate it if you could look through the diagram and point out any errors (thanks to the JPEG format and the reduced resolution of your diagram, as well as my occasionally-dodgy typing, there are probably a few). Cheers, Stannered 14:47, 27 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The diagram is a bit limited... obviously it can't be totally comprehensive, but why, for instance, is Battlefield 2 on there but Battlefield 1942 not? It might also be plausible to follow 'Source' with 'Source 2007', and I'd also question the heading of that era suggesting that an nvidia 3 series could run those games. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.167.43.104 (talk) 11:05, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

NowCommons: Image:Brioschi.jpeg[edit]

Image:Brioschi.jpeg is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:Image:Francesco Brioschi.jpg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[Image:Francesco Brioschi.jpg]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 20:00, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of automated file description generation[edit]

Your upload of File:Assamites.jpg or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 12:22, 8 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Molydeus[edit]

The article Molydeus has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

NN fictional deamon with no assertion of importance - only that it appears a few times.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. The Dissident Aggressor 21:21, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Rutterkin for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rutterkin is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rutterkin until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TTN (talk) 19:18, 18 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Goristro for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Goristro is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Goristro until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TTN (talk) 03:33, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wooden Leg 1913.jpg listed for discussion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Wooden Leg 1913.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 16:53, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Bulezau for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bulezau is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bulezau until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Not a very active user (talk) 08:35, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Bar-lgura for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bar-lgura is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bar-lgura until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Not a very active user (talk) 04:42, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Nabassu for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nabassu is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nabassu until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TTN (talk) 12:44, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Chasme[edit]

The article Chasme has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TTN (talk) 15:29, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Mane (Dungeons & Dragons)[edit]

The article Mane (Dungeons & Dragons) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TTN (talk) 15:31, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Inevitable (Dungeons & Dragons)[edit]

The article Inevitable (Dungeons & Dragons) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TTN (talk) 15:53, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Sibriex[edit]

The article Sibriex has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG. The single listicle is insignificant.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TTN (talk) 14:25, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]