User talk:Edgar181/Archive41

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Administrators' newsletter – January 2019

News and updates for administrators from the past month (December 2018).

Guideline and policy news

  1. G14 (new): Disambiguation pages that disambiguate only zero or one existing pages are now covered under the new G14 criterion (discussion). This is {{db-disambig}}; the text is unchanged and candidates may be found in Category:Candidates for speedy deletion as unnecessary disambiguation pages.
  2. R4 (new): Redirects in the file namespace (and no file links) that have the same name as a file or redirect at Commons are now covered under the new R4 criterion (discussion). This is {{db-redircom}}; the text is unchanged.
  3. G13 (expanded): Userspace drafts containing only the default Article Wizard text are now covered under G13 along with other drafts (discussion). Such blank drafts are now eligible after six months rather than one year, and taggers continue to use {{db-blankdraft}}.

Technical news

  • Starting on December 13, the Wikimedia Foundation security team implemented new password policy and requirements. Privileged accounts (administrators, bureaucrats, checkusers, oversighters, interface administrators, bots, edit filter managers/helpers, template editors, et al.) must have a password at least 10 characters in length. All accounts must have a password:
  1. At least 8 characters in length
  2. Not in the 100,000 most popular passwords (defined by the Password Blacklist library)
  3. Different from their username
User accounts not meeting these requirements will be prompted to update their password accordingly. More information is available on MediaWiki.org.
  • Blocked administrators may now block the administrator that blocked them. This was done to mitigate the possibility that a compromised administrator account would block all other active administrators, complementing the removal of the ability to unblock oneself outside of self-imposed blocks. A request for comment is currently in progress to determine whether the blocking policy should be updated regarding this change.
  • {{Copyvio-revdel}} now has a link to open the history with the RevDel checkboxes already filled in.

Arbitration

Miscellaneous

  • Accounts continue to be compromised on a regular basis. Evidence shows this is entirely due to the accounts having the same password that was used on another website that suffered a data breach. If you have ever used your current password on any other website, you should change it immediately.
  • Around 22% of admins have enabled two-factor authentication, up from 20% in June 2018. If you haven't already enabled it, please consider doing so. Regardless of whether you use 2FA, please practice appropriate account security by ensuring your password is secure and unique to Wikimedia.
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:38, 1 January 2019 (UTC)

AfD Ultrasound Education Group

Hi Ed

As per your closure of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ultrasound Education Group, can you please dump the deleted content at User:Aoziwe/sandbox/Ultrasound Education Group please.

Thanks. Aoziwe (talk) 12:53, 2 January 2019 (UTC)

No problem. It's there now. Regards, -- Ed (Edgar181) 13:05, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
Thanks. Aoziwe (talk) 11:00, 3 January 2019 (UTC)

C6H3Cl3

Hi and again happy new year 2019

About this molecular formula C6H3Cl3 which is corresponding to trichlorobenzene, on the web page https://www.chemicalbook.com/Search_EN.aspx?keyword=C6H3Cl3 the following CAS numbers are found :

  • 1,2,4-trichlorobenzene : #63697-18-7 and #120-82-1, the normal CAS
  • 1,3,5-trichlorobenzene : #63697-19-8, #347-47-7 and #108-70-3, the normal CAS

Could you explain what are those others CAS numbers, please ? Regards --Titou (talk) 17:08, 6 January 2019 (UTC)

Here's what I found:
CAS#87-61-6 is 1,2,3-trichlorobenzene
CAS#120-82-1 is 1,2,4-trichlorobenzene
CAS#108-70-3 is 1,3,5-trichlorobenzene
CAS#12002-48-1 is trichlorobenzene (unspecified isomer)
CAS#63697-18-7 is 1,2,4-trichlorobenzene radical anion
CAS#63697-19-8 is 1,3,5-trichlorobenzene radical anion
CAS#347-47-7 is an unrelated chemical compound: Carbamic acid, 2-naphthalenyl-, 2,2-difluoroethyl ester
Regards, -- Ed (Edgar181) 21:37, 6 January 2019 (UTC)

Cardano ready for submission?

Hello @Edgar181: I pinged you, because I saw you where also previously engaged in Cardano (cryptocurrency platform) talks: contribution. Thank you for your input so far. Do you think this article is ready enough to be submitted as an article for creation? Or do you have any suggestions? If so, please post your comments or just your approval on this talk page. Thank you, --FlippyFlink (talk) 11:06, 9 January 2019 (UTC)

I'm sorry, but I'm not familiar enough with the topic to judge the article content. My involvement in the deleted versions of the article was only an administrative action related to a serial spammer and unrelated to the article content itself. -- Ed (Edgar181) 13:54, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
No problem. Thanks for your reply. --FlippyFlink (talk) 14:07, 9 January 2019 (UTC)

Please take a look

Hi Ed,
I recently edited Benzyl mercaptan to remove an Organic Syntheses reference that (in my view) had no relation to the actual text (link to edit). Smokefoot seemed to disagree and left a slightly condescending message on my talk page, essentially implying that I had not read or understood the article before deciding to remove the reference. Despite my attempts to resolve the content dispute, Smokefoot hasn't directly addressed my concerns with the reference and has now re-added it to the article. In their last reply to me the edit summary was "really?".
I don't want to turn this into an edit war, nor do I really want to engage in any more direct debate, especially since Smokefoot doesn't seem to want to continue it either. But if you could take a look at the exchange and tell me whether I'm either being wrong (about the reference being irrelevant) or oversensitive (about the message being condescending), I would be very grateful. Right now, as a new(ish) editor, I genuinely feel discouraged from contributing further. Please tell me if there's a better place to post this, I didn't know where to go as it involves both content as well as conduct. Many thanks, Yongrenjie (talk) 22:54, 10 January 2019 (UTC)

@Oblxbd9vl69f: Sorry for the slow reply. It's always hard to interpret tone and emotion in online conversations, but when reading the conversation on your user talk page I don't think Smokefoot is being condenscending and it certainly contains niceties ("thanks for the note and best wishes"), so I personally wouldn't be concerned about that. As for the content, I think you have a point. There is a distinction between arylation and alkylation that I think Smokefoot isn't appreciating. I think the easiest solution might be to simply find a reference that more explicitly supports the claim, and add that to the article. I've been around Wikipedia for a long time and come across many situations where I disagreed with other editors where it couldn't be resolved. In these cases, I try to keep things is perspective. Wikipedia is such a big place, even within the confines of chemistry content, and there is so much work to be done that if you aren't satisfied with the outcome editing one article, you can move on to another article and contribute there. Don't let dissatisfaction with one article or with interactions with one editor turn you off from contributing to Wikipedia if that's what you want to do. -- Ed (Edgar181) 13:43, 12 January 2019 (UTC)
Thank you for taking the time to reply, Ed. I appreciate it. Honestly, I think I may just have been in a bad place that day too, and I certainly don't bear any ill will now. I'll take a break for a while, but I hope to come back some time in the near future. Thanks again and have a good day, Oblxbd9vl69f (talk) 01:29, 13 January 2019 (UTC)

No warning?

You just deleted Draft:Corruption in America and other drafts of mine. I understand the relevant policy, but why didn't you warn me? Aren't people supposed to receive a warning?  — Mr. Guye (talk) (contribs)  17:41, 14 January 2019 (UTC)

There is a bot that makes the warnings a month before drafts meet the criteria for deletion. If you didn't receive one, I'm not sure why. I'd be happy to immediately restore the draft if you would like to keep it. -- Ed (Edgar181) 17:44, 14 January 2019 (UTC)

my article "european project on ocean acidfication

Hello Ed,

when i "moved" my draft from my sandbox to publish the article about "Epoca" on wiki i made a mistake and put a "the" to the title ("the european project on ocean...) , i then re-moved it to change into "european project on ocean acidification" But the problem was i did'nt want the redirect page to be visible so i asked to delete the page "the european project on ocean acidification" to only have "european project on ocean acidification" which was the exact same page but with the only correction of "the" not in the title. I 've seen yu made changes but what i don't understand is why do i not find "european project on ocean acidification" when i search google : i have a link called "the european project on ocean acidification" The_European_Project_on_Ocean_Acidification_(EPOCA) but no page "european project on ocean acidification" ... It's that page i want to see : European_Project_on_Ocean_Acidification, how can i have it now sorted out by google and the former one put out ? thx a lot Nuluru (talk) 20:18, 14 January 2019 (UTC)

It's my understanding that it can take a few days for Google to include new Wikipedia articles in its search results. If you Google "european project on ocean acidification" again later this week, I expect that one of the top results will be the Wikipedia article European Project on Ocean Acidification. -- Ed (Edgar181) 20:31, 14 January 2019 (UTC)

request for svg image

Monolysocardiolipin Mfernflower (talk) 05:08, 15 January 2019 (UTC)

I replaced the image with an svg version. Regards, -- Ed (Edgar181) 16:07, 15 January 2019 (UTC)

Module deletion

Hi. You deleted page Module:Chembox/doc as I asked for, thanks, but actually the request was for main module page Module:Chembox. I think posting the template on the /doc page is SOP for this. Anyway, could you delete the module page with it? -DePiep (talk) 14:16, 17 January 2019 (UTC)

Sorry, I didn't catch that's what was intended. The module itself is deleted now too. Regards, -- Ed (Edgar181) 14:27, 17 January 2019 (UTC)

Salt (chemistry) and Smokefoot

Hi Ed

Could you review the changes made to Salt (chemistry) made by Smokefoot? I believe them to be unhelpful and often just wrong.

Thanks, J G Campbell (talk) 21:35, 19 January 2019 (UTC)

I'm not sure what you are asking about. Smokefoot's last edit to that article was over six months ago and was just reverting vandalism. -- Ed (Edgar181) 13:53, 20 January 2019 (UTC)

Revision w/ Personal Information Deletion Request

Hi Ed, I was wondering if you might be able to delete these two revisions on the "Rechargeable Battery" page. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Rechargeable_battery&oldid=879748488 https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Rechargeable_battery&oldid=879748982

As a joke a friend posted some personal information on there but he didn't realize revisions stay public forever. He tried to remove it and edit the page again but the revisions still exist.

Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2604:6000:E98D:FC00:295B:E9B0:34F9:60D8 (talk) 07:06, 23 January 2019 (UTC)

No problem. It's hidden now. -- Ed (Edgar181) 11:51, 23 January 2019 (UTC)

12.153.26.234

user:12.153.26.234 is abusing her talkpage while blocked. CLCStudent (talk) 16:36, 24 January 2019 (UTC)

Talk page access revoked. Regards, -- Ed (Edgar181) 16:38, 24 January 2019 (UTC)

Proxies

I have a small doubt I would like to clear out. Are proxies forbidden to edit in Wikipedia or only if they do so disruptively? Many thanks in advance. --Jamez42 (talk) 17:41, 26 January 2019 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Open proxies has the details. In practice, admins block them when they are found to be used abusively. Also, User:ProcseeBot automatically blocks them preemptively, but I don't know the criteria it uses to do so. -- Ed (Edgar181) 17:47, 26 January 2019 (UTC)

Thank you for being one of Wikipedia's top medical contributors!

The 2018 Cure Award
In 2018 you were one of the top ~250 medical editors across any language of Wikipedia. Thank you from Wiki Project Med Foundation for helping bring free, complete, accurate, up-to-date health information to the public. We really appreciate you and the vital work you do! Wiki Project Med Foundation is a user group whose mission is to improve our health content. Consider joining here, there are no associated costs.

Thanks again :-) -- Doc James along with the rest of the team at Wiki Project Med Foundation 17:41, 28 January 2019 (UTC)

AIuminum listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect AIuminum. Since you had some involvement with the AIuminum redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 16:29, 29 January 2019 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – February 2019

News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2019).

Administrator changes

added Enterprisey • JJMC89
readded BorgQueen
removed Harro5 • Jenks24 • Graft • R. Baley

Interface administrator changes

removedEnterprisey

Guideline and policy news

  • A request for comment is currently open to reevaluate the activity requirements for administrators.
  • Administrators who are blocked have the technical ability to block the administrator who blocked their own account. A recent request for comment has amended the blocking policy to clarify that this ability should only be used in exceptional circumstances, such as account compromises, where there is a clear and immediate need.
  • A request for comment closed with a consensus in favor of deprecating The Sun as a permissible reference, and creating an edit filter to warn users who attempt to cite it.

Technical news

  • A discussion regarding an overhaul of the format and appearance of Wikipedia:Requests for page protection is in progress (permalink). The proposed changes will make it easier to create requests for those who are not using Twinkle. The workflow for administrators at this venue will largely be unchanged. Additionally, there are plans to archive requests similar to how it is done at WP:PERM, where historical records are kept so that prior requests can more easily be searched for.

Miscellaneous

  • Voting in the 2019 Steward elections will begin on 08 February 2019, 14:00 (UTC) and end on 28 February 2019, 13:59 (UTC). The confirmation process of current stewards is being held in parallel. You can automatically check your eligibility to vote.
  • A new IRC bot is available that allows you to subscribe to notifications when specific filters are tripped. This requires that your IRC handle be identified.
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:15, 4 February 2019 (UTC)

Dioxolane

Hi,

How do you do? For my part, it's always CAS numbers questions^^ and today it's about 1,3-dioxolane for which all wp versions give CAS number #646-06-0 but I found here, second item, CAS #4362-13-4! WHY ?? c'est quoi ce bintz? in french. Please Edgar, I still need your help to understand. Regards --Titou (talk) 15:15, 4 February 2019 (UTC)

CAS# 646-06-0 is 1,3-dioxolane. CAS# 4362-13-4 is 1,2-dioxolane. Regards, -- Ed (Edgar181) 15:22, 4 February 2019 (UTC)

24.39.129.50

Hi Ed. Just a heads-up that regarding your block of 24.39.129.50 (talk · contribs · WHOIS), this user has admitted to block evasion of an indefinitely blocked account. Thanks. epicgenius (talk) 16:13, 4 February 2019 (UTC)

Thanks for letting me know. -- Ed (Edgar181) 16:19, 4 February 2019 (UTC)

You forgot

You forgot to put a block notice on Ass salads talk page. Just to let you know. --TheWinRat (talk) 16:21, 11 February 2019 (UTC)

Yeah, it looks like I missed that. -- Ed (Edgar181) 21:54, 12 February 2019 (UTC)

I Need a little help from you.

Hello Edgar, i am owner of news portal InfoKosova, and i need to create a page form my business, but i am new on wikipedia, can you give me a phone number or whatsapp or a viber to talk with you to create an article without errors, or can you publish the right text for my business InfoKosova.

Our business websiete is: www.infokosova.org Our business facebook page is: www.fb.com/infokosova

i can writte here some text about our business and please tell me where is the problem that you deleted my article about our business:


Thank you very much and i hope you can help me. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Airbesi (talk • contribs) 22:19, 13 February 2019 (UTC)

No, I'm not going to create that page for you. You've been given ample reasons on your talk page why it's not an appropriate topic for Wikipedia. -- Ed (Edgar181) 22:47, 13 February 2019 (UTC)

96 (film)

You actually did not remove the offending file and just revdel'ed it, still exposing the file to the public. You may want to revisit the page and hide one more edit. (File was deleted) — regards, Revi 13:35, 14 February 2019 (UTC)

Thanks for letting me know. It's gone now. -- Ed (Edgar181) 13:37, 14 February 2019 (UTC)

National Rifle Association

[Edit=Require administrator access] (indefinite)

Did we have a problem with our dropdown menu? GMGtalk 01:02, 16 February 2019 (UTC)

Yes we did. Fixed now. -- Ed (Edgar181) 01:04, 16 February 2019 (UTC)

request for svg image

for diphenyldiselenide as I think the current one is drawn wrong Mfernflower (talk) 00:17, 21 February 2019 (UTC)

The current image appears to be consistent with the chemical structure as determined by x-ray crystallography. See the file description at File:Diphenyl-diselenide-from-xtal-2010-Mercury-3D-sf.png for the source of the structure data. Drawing the two phenyl groups with wedge bonds intuitively "feels" wrong at first, but I think is appropriate. -- Ed (Edgar181) 13:29, 21 February 2019 (UTC)

That's pretty wild Mfernflower (talk) 16:12, 1 March 2019 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for clearing out WP:UAA yesterday. I was just about to ping WP:AN about it when you started going through it. shoy (reactions) 15:49, 21 February 2019 (UTC)

I'm glad to help. -- Ed (Edgar181) 18:47, 21 February 2019 (UTC)

116.26.111.201

116.26.111.201 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

WP:TPOC violation: [1]

Could we please revoke his talk page access? --Guy Macon (talk) 18:04, 23 February 2019 (UTC)

Looks like User:Widr has already taken care of it. Thanks, Widr. And thanks, Guy, for letting me know. -- Ed (Edgar181) 18:27, 23 February 2019 (UTC)

MRS JUSTICE PAUFFLEY

Did you read my objection to the deletion? JorgeLaArdilla (talk) 21:18, 23 February 2019 (UTC)

Yes, but I believe the deletion was appropraite per the cited criteria. -- Ed (Edgar181) 21:19, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
To me it is common sense. But it is consensus as well: redirects in all capps are routinely nominated at WP:RFD and always lead to deletion with reference to WP:RCAPS. -- Ed (Edgar181) 21:30, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
ie it is neither implausible, a typo or a misnomer (The G3 crieria you claim). JorgeLaArdilla (talk) 21:33, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
You and I have different definitions of implausible, I suppose. -- Ed (Edgar181)
not seeming reasonable or probable is mine. What is yours? (Why am I having to repeat myself- oh you deleted my original comment) JorgeLaArdilla (talk) 21:39, 23 February 2019 (UTC)

Edit summary removal

Sorry to bother you, but when I published this edit my device made a bizarre autocorrect of the edit summary, and it's bound to be confusing for those looking at the page history, so could you please remove the summary?

Thank you, Entranced98 (talk) 16:35, 25 February 2019 (UTC)

The criteria by which administrators are permitted to redact edit summaries is actually quite limited (see WP:CRD) and doesn't cover this type of situation. Your edit summary is harmless, so I wouldn't worry about it. However, you can follow the suggestion at Help:Edit_summary#Fixing about making a dummy edit to clarify the edit summary of you wish. Regards, -- Ed (Edgar181) 17:34, 25 February 2019 (UTC)
Thanks, it's now sorted with a dummy edit :) Entranced98 (talk) 17:55, 25 February 2019 (UTC)

Would you update Module:Citation/CS1?

I updated its sandboxes to suport ChemRxiv. If you update Module:Citation/CS1, Module:Citation/CS1/COinS, Module:Citation/CS1/Identifiers, Module:Citation/CS1/Whitelist and Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration, we can use {{Cite ChemRxiv}}. --Sharouser (talk) 01:56, 1 March 2019 (UTC)

Please, do not. At first blush, this change looks like it might work but there has been no testing; no discussion; nothing to prove that it is wanted, or that it works. Discussion should take place at Help talk:Citation Style 1. Ping Sharouser.
—Trappist the monk (talk) 02:21, 1 March 2019 (UTC)
I'm open to the possibility of adding ChemRxiv, but I agree that this is definitely something that should be discussed before any change is implemented. -- Ed (Edgar181) 12:27, 1 March 2019 (UTC)

Because Sharouser has declined to discuss the changes to the sandboxen at Help talk:Citation Style 1, I have reverted those changes.

—Trappist the monk (talk) 11:29, 7 March 2019 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – March 2019

News and updates for administrators from the past month (February 2019).

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

  • A new tool is available to help determine if a given IP is an open proxy/VPN/webhost/compromised host.

Arbitration

  • The Arbitration Committee announced two new OTRS queues. Both are meant solely for cases involving private information; other cases will continue to be handled at the appropriate venues (e.g., WP:COIN or WP:SPI).
    • paid-en-wp@wikipedia.org has been set up to receive private evidence related to abusive paid editing.
    • checkuser-en-wp@wikipedia.org has been set up to receive private requests for CheckUser. For instance, requests for IP block exemption for anonymous proxy editing should now be sent to this address instead of the functionaries-en list.

Miscellaneous

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:12, 4 March 2019 (UTC)

Carbon black

Hello, I don't know how to start a new conversation at the bottom, but I am confused about the article on carbon black. Someone has cited mitsubishi as saying carbon is a good conductor of electricity, then they say mitsubishi uses it as anti static additive agent in their fuel caps. I googled the conductivity of carbon and found it very low. Please explain how it is a good conductor. Also I would like to make toilet plungers for a living. How might I make the cheapest plunger rubber that you can think of? I was going to use a DIY heated press mold but maybe there's a better way. Please point me in the right direction. Thank you sir. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 107.242.113.11 (talk) 03:28, 9 March 2019 (UTC)

Pentapeptide

Hello. Please can you help to fix the incoming links to Pentapeptide? The two meanings are confusingly similar to the layman, so I think it needs a subject expert to tell them apart. Thanks, Certes (talk) 14:44, 11 March 2019 (UTC)

I've have now disambiguated them all. Thanks for letting me know. I should have realized that this needed to be done when I converted the page to a dab page. Regards, -- Ed (Edgar181) 15:00, 11 March 2019 (UTC)

Can you comment?

You just deleted 2 pages that I CSDed, thus I would really like if you could share your 2 cents on this discussion. --Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 20:49, 13 March 2019 (UTC)

I'm afraid I don't have anything productive to say. Simply redirecting them or deleting them per WP:CSD#G8 are both perfectly fine and functionally equivalent options. -- Ed (Edgar181) 20:53, 13 March 2019 (UTC)
Edgar181, would you mind saying just that? Having an admin comment on the thread would be helpful (whether you agree with my statement or not). Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 20:57, 13 March 2019 (UTC)
OK, I made my comment there. I suspect the wikilawyering types will not be happy. :) -- Ed (Edgar181) 21:06, 13 March 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Electric smoking system

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Electric smoking system. Legobot (talk) 04:33, 14 March 2019 (UTC)

Recently blocked IP

See User talk:74.0.75.206#March 2019. May need a range block here. Amaury (talk | contribs) 17:54, 17 March 2019 (UTC)

At the moment there isn't a range to block (as far as I can tell), but I'll keep an eye out for related problematic editing. -- Ed (Edgar181) 17:59, 17 March 2019 (UTC)

The deletion of J. Mark McWatters Page

Hi, I am requesting for a page I created for J.Mark McWatters to be deleted. I understand that multiple users have edited this page and this was the reasoning as to why I could not receive a speedy deletion. I tried proposing a deletion but that was rejected as well without explanation. I am affiliated with the individual I created the page for and I am asking for the page to be removed.PublikTrust (talk) 16:00, 19 March 2019 (UTC)

You're welcome to nominate the page for deletion using WP:AFD, but I don't think it is likely that the page would be deleted. If you are affiliated with the subject of the article or with other things you have written about on Wikipedia, such as National Credit Union Administration, you should have a look at Wikipedia's policies regarding conflicts of interest which are described at WP:COI and WP:PAID. Regards, -- Ed (Edgar181) 18:04, 19 March 2019 (UTC)

BabyTrumpTour

I see that you have (quite reasonably) blocked User:BabyTrumpTour, but also that you have not left an explanation on the account's talk page. Please do so. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 20:56, 23 March 2019 (UTC)

Done. -- Ed (Edgar181) 13:44, 25 March 2019 (UTC)

Precious

mechanism of action

Thank you for quality articles (804 as of today) on chemical compounds such as Bergamottin and Halomon, their mechanism of action and their people such as Henry Rapoport, with countless structure diagrams, for service from 2005, - Edgar, repeating from ten years ago and 2 October 2009: you are an awesome Wikipedian!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:02, 26 March 2019 (UTC)

Awesome
Ten years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:46, 26 March 2019 (UTC)

@Gerda Arendt: Thank you very much. That is very thoughtful of you. It's hard to believe that ten years ago I had already been editing Wikipedia for several years. Regards, -- Ed (Edgar181) 12:31, 26 March 2019 (UTC)
Agree. I joined in 2009, but dear people were thoughtful from 2007, and I like to follow. Nice to get to know people like you! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 13:06, 26 March 2019 (UTC)

Update Wuhanic acid

Dear Edgar, Thank you for the great job you did on adding the Chembox for nebraskanic acid. Would you mind adding a Chembox for wuhanic acid? I think that this will make this entry more informative. By the way, I am also Edgar and a biochemist. Ecahoon2 (talk) 16:48, 30 March 2019 (UTC)

No problem, I've added a Chembox to wuhanic acid. Thanks for creating those two articles. Nice to meet you Edgar.  :) -- Ed (Edgar181) 12:08, 31 March 2019 (UTC)

Haematoxylin

Edgar181 I have been working on the Haematoxylin page. There are still some parts I want to expand, but if you have time, could you look at some of the edits? Especially since I am new to editing on Wikipedia, I want to make sure I'm doing OK. Thanks, Waughd (talk) 20:10, 31 March 2019 (UTC)

I think it looks great. Thanks for expanding the article. -- Ed (Edgar181) 12:40, 1 April 2019 (UTC)

User talk:RINA NURSE AND AYA CENTRE

You may wish to revoke talk page access.--Cahk (talk) 07:54, 1 April 2019 (UTC)

 Done. Thanks for letting me know. -- Ed (Edgar181) 12:40, 1 April 2019 (UTC)

User talk:209.209.238.149

Hiya! I was looking at a block request on this page, and I noticed you'd blocked the /19 as "anon only". We usually hard-block proxies; perhaps this was just out of habit for you since you mostly do vandalism anon-only blocks? --jpgordon𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇 22:26, 5 April 2019 (UTC)

Yes, I was in the mindset of dealing with an issue arising from anonymous editing rather than registered accounts. I have no objection to a hard block. -- Ed (Edgar181) 22:45, 5 April 2019 (UTC)

Picomolar SSRI

Hey Edgar, how much do you know about Picomolar active drugs.

E.g. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_phenyltropanes#/media/File:Tamagnan.png

That one has been nutmegged all over it.

See this one also:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_phenyltropanes#/media/File:RTI-470_structure.png

--89.243.137.161 (talk) 14:29, 6 April 2019 (UTC)

There are many different classes of drugs which have examples with picomolar activity. I don't understand what you are asking me with regards to phenyltropanes though. -- Ed (Edgar181) 14:31, 6 April 2019 (UTC)

Picomolar Ki (IC50) is exceedingly rare. Usually it is nanomolar or micromolar to monoamine transporters.--92.24.196.75 (talk) 09:18, 7 April 2019 (UTC)

Yes, when it comes to monamine transporters, most compounds of interest have activity in the nanomolar or low micromolar range. -- Ed (Edgar181) 11:28, 7 April 2019 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – April 2019

News and updates for administrators from the past month (March 2019).

Technical news

Arbitration

Miscellaneous

  • Two more administrator accounts were compromised. Evidence has shown that these attacks, like previous incidents, were due to reusing a password that was used on another website that suffered a data breach. If you have ever used your current password on any other website, you should change it immediately. All admins are strongly encouraged to enable two-factor authentication, please consider doing so. Please always practice appropriate account security by ensuring your password is secure and unique to Wikimedia.
  • As a reminder, according to WP:NOQUORUM, administrators looking to close or relist an AfD should evaluate a nomination that has received few or no comments as if it were a proposed deletion (PROD) prior to determining whether it should be relisted.
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:57, 7 April 2019 (UTC)

Your block set on 39.53.253.153

Just leaving you an FYI that I extended the block you set from 31 hours to 72 hours and left the user a note. They also engaged in repeated copyright violations during this time and you beat me to blocking the IP by mere seconds (lol). I felt that a block for the copyright violations were necessary, so I went ahead and extended the duration you set instead. If you have questions, objections, concerns, etc, please don't hesitate to let me know (ping me in your response) and I'll be happy to discuss it with you. I don't think you'll take issue with this, but I figured I'd let you know just in case. ;-) Cheers - ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 18:31, 10 April 2019 (UTC)

No worries, looks perfectly reasonable to me. -- Ed (Edgar181) 18:54, 10 April 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Rocket Lab

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Rocket Lab. Legobot (talk) 04:28, 14 April 2019 (UTC)

Request for Wikipedia:Rollback rights

Hello Edgar181, I kindly request you to grant me rollback rights so that I can fight vandalism.I'm a member of WikiProject Uganda but in my early editing trials, I ended up blanking the project page, it was unreplaced until of recent when I learnt how to replace removed content on a page and did it myself.I discovered there's need for rollbacker rights to get things done with one click.Waiting for your parental assistance. Warm regards. I'm Agaba Perez (talk) 05:42, 14 April 2019 (UTC)

@Agaba Perez: Done. Please make sure that you only use it appropriately per guidelines at Wikipedia:Rollback. Regards, -- Ed (Edgar181) 16:06, 14 April 2019 (UTC)

Human tooth development

Edgar, I reverted some vandalism on the human tooth development page. Hopefully I did it correctly. Waughd (talk) 17:07, 14 April 2019 (UTC)

Yes, you did it right. Regards, -- Ed (Edgar181) 22:29, 14 April 2019 (UTC)
Thanks Edgar181, I'm glad I didn't break anything. Waughd (talk) 22:51, 14 April 2019 (UTC)

Notice

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Possible misuse of rollback by User:Agaba Perez. SemiHypercube 01:49, 17 April 2019 (UTC)

I noticed you didn't provide a reason as to why you upgraded the user to rollback, was it a mistake? --Thegooduser Life Begins With a Smile :) 🍁 02:06, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
No, granting rollback wasn't unintentional. See the request above. As a user in good standing who's been here since 2017, I believe it was a reasonable request. However, it didn't work out well in this case. -- Ed (Edgar181) 11:45, 17 April 2019 (UTC)

Draft:India Social Foundation

Hi Edgar181, I notice you moved the user's page to this draft page as I was doing my recent changes patrolling. I checked through the draft, as a lot of it looked very promotionally written, and noticed that the entire content of this draft is either wrong or purposely lying. The links either do not work, or point to sources that do not appear to mention the organisation at all. Is it a hoax? Agent00x (talk) 12:30, 17 April 2019 (UTC)

I haven't looked too closely at the content, but it does appear to have verifiability problems (to say the least). It's on my watch list and if the draft ever gets submitted, either I or someone else will review it carefully for accuracy. For now, I've tagged it with {{accuracy}}. Thanks for letting me know of the problem. -- Ed (Edgar181) 13:02, 17 April 2019 (UTC)

Entry about Daniele Orsato you deleted

I would appreciate if you don't delete article data based on facts, it's not controversial, it's a fact, if it's a fact it's unbiased, if it's unbiased you have no right to delete it. Added 2 sources so that you can take a proper look at something before deleting it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.0.33.179 (talk) 15:19, 19 April 2019 (UTC)

As far as I can tell, this happens often with articles about referees. An encyclopedia article about a referee doesn't need to catalog every call they made that you're unhappy with. -- Ed (Edgar181) 11:50, 22 April 2019 (UTC)

Piperidines, etc.

Hi there. Looking at your logs, I fear that my article creation might be causing others a lot of work. I apologize if that is the case, because my intentions are good even if my methods are occasionally inept. This request also applies to @Graeme Bartlett: and @DMacks:. If any of you have suggestions that would make my efforts less onerous for you, please pass them on here or on my Talk page. --Smokefoot (talk) 16:03, 19 April 2019 (UTC)

@Smokefoot: Naturally building an encyclopedia involves work. I look at new pages and edit them because I enjoy it. So don't hold back from creating articles. Some kinds of editing may be more onerous for you, but easier for others. I use some javascripts I wrote to make adding parameter values to the Chembox easy. I am also slowly going through the articles missing PubChem CIDs and upgrading them. I am upto "J" so far. I also notice that Edgar181 fixes up things I forgot or are too hard for me to do in article that I start (eg capitalisation, redirects and pictures). So we work as a team to make the encyclopedia better. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:10, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
@Smokefoot and Graeme Bartlett: Sorry for the slow reply. The articles you create, Smokefoot, are great - I certainly wouldn't call anything you do here "inept". Edits I've made to articles you've created are mostly trivial. It's the kind light housekeeping that I often find relaxing around here. Please don't worry about causing extra work. One suggestion I have is to remember when renaming an article to use the Move button, rather than cutting the text from one title and pasting into the other. Regards, -- Ed (Edgar181) 11:49, 22 April 2019 (UTC)

User page

Hi I wanted to know what is the reason of delete my talk page becuase i am not doing any promotional activities for anyone. Supriyakanase (talk) 10:34, 23 April 2019 (UTC)

I deleted the page because it was blatantly self-promotional. Please see Wikipedia:User pages for details about what is and what isn't appropriate content for user pages. -- Ed (Edgar181) 11:37, 23 April 2019 (UTC)

Today's Wikipedian 10 years ago

Awesome
Ten years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:03, 26 April 2019 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Edgar181/Archive41&oldid=900809203"