User talk:Edderso
Welcome!
Hello, Edderso, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Tutorial
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! --AW (talk) 22:49, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
Your request for rollback
[edit]
Hi Edderso. After reviewing your request for rollback, I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:
- Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
- Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
- Rollback should never be used to edit war.
- If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
- Use common sense.
If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback. I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! FASTILY (TALK) 02:02, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
ACC Request
[edit]I would like to sign up for the Account Creation Request Interface and I have requested an account on the interface. Thank you. -- EdTrist talk contribs 15:51, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
- Hey there. I'm sorry to say I have declined your request per the fact that you have been actively editing only for a month. While I appreciate your interest in ACC, I think you need more experience before being granted access to the tool. Please re-request after one or two months by asking any of the ACC admins (you can of course ask me). Cheers, Pmlineditor ∞ 10:32, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
Thanks...
[edit]...for the quick reversion of my user page. something lame from CBW 16:00, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks also from me. I wonder who this was a sock of? Nick-D (talk) 07:05, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
Is it something about Ed?
[edit]Feel free to pull this section if you want. Not sure if it's something about the name Ed that causes two of us to be squashing vandals on Huggle at the same time. Funny coincidence though, isn't it?--GnoworTC 19:00, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
Many thanks for your prompt response and good work catching edits to User:Hashbrowncipher. My edits to that page were intentional, not vandalism; I just forgot to log in. Thanks again. Hashbrowncipher (talk) 02:16, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
User pages
[edit]Please use a colon: after user names. :-) Bearian (talk) 19:47, 1 April 2010 (UTC) For example, see User:EdTrist/Test2. Bearian (talk) 19:48, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
I'm really sorry about those false changes those were from my lil'bro.He's usualy so inoccent,but he got in trouble for typing such innnapropriate content.So please do not blame it on me.
best wishes,
james konen
Thanks ill just leave some basic information up then. Thanks
—Preceding unsigned comment added by James konen (talk • contribs) 01:23, 20 April 2010 (UTC)
Re: unblanking of Legal Information for Families Today
[edit]Hi, EdTrist. Keep in mind that when an editor blanks a page to which he or she is the sole significant contributor, that's considered equivalent to a request for speedy deletion per WP:CSD#G7 and doesn't merit a vandalism warning. In such a case, just tag the page {{db-author}} or {{db-blanked}} instead. Cheers! -- Rrburke (talk) 17:19, 20 April 2010 (UTC)
Just what is your problem? A vandal had removed large portions of the article. Since the material was sourced, I re-added it. Reverting vandalism is a good thing, isn't it? 75.2.209.226 (talk) 19:09, 14 May 2010 (UTC)
- Hi. My apologies, that was a mistake and I've put the information back now. Thank you for reverting it in the first place, and I apologise for seeing it as vandalism. -- EdTrist talk contribs 19:35, 14 May 2010 (UTC)
- Please, for the record, put your apology on my talk page. Thanks. 75.2.209.226 (talk) 20:10, 14 May 2010 (UTC)
Boyd 86.162.71.158 (talk) 22:57, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
You are now a Reviewer
[edit]
Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, will be commencing a a two-month trial at approximately 23:00, 2010 June 15 (UTC).
Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under flagged protection. Flagged protection is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial.
When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.
If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 18:04, 15 June 2010 (UTC)
Nicholas Breakspear School
[edit]Hi, thank you for removing vandalism from the Nicholas Breakspear School article. Goes to show the importance of being fastidious while reverting. --Iohannes Animosus (talk) 20:40, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
Mineral, VA
[edit]Hi, I was actually present in the epicenter of the earthquake. Being a geological scientist I can firmly say that the earthquake did hit a 9,001 rating in Mineral as it was the closest distance from the earthquake, only 3.7 miles above it. So therefore my edits are correct and I would appreciate if you would stop vandalizing the page with false information. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.244.74.219 (talk) 19:19, 23 August 2011 (UTC)
New Page Patrol survey
[edit] New page patrol – Survey Invitation Hello Edderso! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you.
Please click HERE to take part. You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey |
A barnstar for you!
[edit]
|
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar |
| I saw you on vandalism patrol today. It's my personal tradition to give barnstars to any vandal fighter I happen to see, and while I admittedly don't keep on top of my queue I at least make sure SOME users get one! So here's a barnstar, if you eat WikiLove for breakfast. K6ka (talk | contribs) 03:16, 8 February 2014 (UTC) |
Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!
[edit]
- Hi ! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
-- 01:36, Thursday, November 28, 2024 (UTC)
| Mission 1 | Mission 2 | Mission 3 | Mission 4 | Mission 5 | Mission 6 | Mission 7 |
| Say Hello to the World | An Invitation to Earth | Small Changes, Big Impact | The Neutral Point of View | The Veil of Verifiability | The Civility Code | Looking Good Together |
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:02, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:11, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]
Hello, Edderso. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
RC Patrol-related Proposals in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey
[edit]
Greetings Recent Changes Patrollers!
This is a one-time-only message to inform you about technical proposals related to Recent Changes Patrol in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey that I think you may be interested in reviewing and perhaps even voting for:
- Adjust number of entries and days at Last unpatrolled
- Editor-focused central editing dashboard
- "Hide trusted users" checkbox option on watchlists and related/recent changes (RC) pages
- Real-Time Recent Changes App for Android
- Shortcut for patrollers to last changes list
Further, there are more than 20 proposals related to Watchlists in general that you may be interested in reviewing. (and over 260 proposals in all, across many aspects of wikis)
Thank you for your consideration. Please note that voting for proposals continues through December 12, 2016.
Note: You received this message because you have transcluded {{User wikipedia/RC Patrol}} (user box) on your user page. Since this message is "one-time-only" there is no opt out for future mailings.
Best regards, Stevietheman — Delivered: 01:11, 8 December 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Edderso. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Edderso. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)