User talk:Dxdestroyer

March 2011[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Stargate Universe, please cite a reliable source for the content of your edit. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. See Wikipedia:Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Rehevkor ✉ 20:17, 16 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Users are expected to collaborate with others and avoid editing disruptively.

In particular, the three-revert rule states that:

Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Rehevkor ✉ 20:31, 16 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop this. You are again verging on a WP:3RR violation and as Xeworlebi said "If they're not disappointed they're not fans. Obvious and unneeded statement. Stop edit warring". You are welcome to discuss this at Talk:Stargate Universe but at the moment you are not listening to reason and are just wasting everyone's time. Rehevkor ✉ 18:33, 18 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text

{{unblock|reason=I want unblocked because it's crap.  It's edit warring when I doit, but when I get my fact changed over and over again there are no reprucussions to be had.  I just want that added into that Stargate Universe Wikipedia page somewhere.  Maybe the opening paragraph isn't the best place, but IT SHOULD BE SOMEWHERE.  I'm not asking a lot I just want a blatant fact be there for everyone to see not hidden because  some people don't like the show.  It's bluntly obvious that Stargate Universe isn't popular among many fans and these attempts to boot my contribution are a clear example of that and Wikipedia representives should be ashamed to let the minoirty be bullied in such a way.  I'm being fair when I ask for my contribution to be added somewhere.  If everyone's probably is where it's at I'll recede, but if the line it's self continues to be revoked then the minority is conquered again.}}

, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Gogo Dodo (talk) 18:35, 18 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 days for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text

{{unblock|reason=I want unblocked because it's crap. It's edit warring when I do it, but when I get my fact changed over and over again there are no reprecussions to be had. I just want that added into that Stargate Universe Wikipedia page somewhere. Maybe the opening paragraph isn't the best place, but IT SHOULD BE SOMEWHERE. I'm not asking a lot I just want a blatant fact be there for everyone to see not hidden because some people don't like the show. It's bluntly obvious that Stargate Universe isn't popular among many fans and these attempts to boot my contribution are a clear example of that and Wikipedia representives should be ashamed to let the minoirty be bullied in such a way. I'm being fair when I ask for my contribution to be added somewhere. If everyone's problem is where it's at, I'll recede, but if the line it's self continues to be revoked then the minority is conquered again.}}

, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Ckatz^chat _spy 19:33, 23 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. Note that your first edits upon returning from a previous block involved the immediate resumption of the behaviour that led to your first two blocks. Further incidents may result in an extended or permanent suspension of editing privileges. Ckatz^chat _spy 20:20, 29 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

ANI[edit]

Please see Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Dxdestroyer and Stargate Universe Яehevkor ✉ 17:48, 2 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

November 2011[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used mainly for disruptive editing, as you did at Stargate Universe. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 22:12, 2 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]