Jump to content

User talk:DuncanScottMackenzie

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]

William T. Warrener, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Sincerely, Akjar13 (He's Gone Mental) 11:23, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

In response to your feedback[edit]

Thank you for your contributions; keep up the good work :)

Lectonar (talk) 09:46, 26 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

 

Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]

William Logsdail, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Alpha_Quadrant (talk) 17:18, 2 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]

George Francis Carline, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Hallows AG (talk) 00:38, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.


Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Bmusician 12:51, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.


Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! JayJayTalk to me 22:58, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]

Frederick Hall (painter), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

 :- ) DCS 17:01, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Lincoln School of Art[edit]

Hi, I have assessed the quality of the article for WikiProject Lincolnshire as C-class, I have left the priority as unsure of their priority classification. The main problems are Manual of Style things which should be easy to fix with a bit of effort. For example dates should not have ordinals and no comma between the month and year for day first dates also the punctuation goes before the reference markers rather than after. Maybe an infobox or lead image could be added to the article.

If you are quick then you may be able to get an appearance in the Did You Know? section of the main page. Keith D (talk) 12:10, 11 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Lincoln School of Art, a page you created has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements. If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13. Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 22:33, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Lincoln School of Art, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:35, 26 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: CS Monarch (1946) has been accepted[edit]

CS Monarch (1946), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Robert McClenon (talk) 23:31, 7 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Direct, reliable sources needed for Days of the Year pages[edit]

You're probably not aware of this change, but Days of the Year pages now require direct reliable sources for additions. For details see the content guideline, the WikiProject Days of the Year style guide or the edit notice on any DOY page. Almost all new additions without references are now being reverted on-sight.

Please do not add new additions to these pages without direct sources as the burden to provide them is on the editor who adds or restores material to these pages.

Thank you. Toddst1 (talk) 15:07, 14 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]