User talk:Drown Soda/Archive 2
 | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Your GA nomination of Black Dahlia
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Black Dahlia you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. 
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of 3E1I5S8B9RF7 -- 3E1I5S8B9RF7 (talk) 11:00, 9 January 2018 (UTC)
- Once again, I invite you respond on the review page and to clean up the article so that it can get promoted to a GA.--3E1I5S8B9RF7 (talk) 12:07, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
- @3E1I5S8B9RF7: thank you much, I will look over this within the next day and address your comments. --Drown Soda (talk) 13:47, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
Hi Drown Soda! I just wanted to let you know that me and two other editors have posted comments on your FLC for List of Fordham University alumni. I wanted to tell you in case you were unaware. Happy editing. BeatlesLedTV (talk) 22:06, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Black Dahlia
The article Black Dahlia you nominated as a good article has passed 
; see Talk:Black Dahlia for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of 3E1I5S8B9RF7 -- 3E1I5S8B9RF7 (talk) 11:21, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Hole (band)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Hole (band) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Mike Christie -- Mike Christie (talk) 12:00, 18 January 2018 (UTC)
Helping out with a page
Drown Soda,
If at all possible, would you be able to help me tidy up the Earl Holliman filmography page? I've been trying to do the table format for both his film, TV, and self appearances, yet I haven't been successful at cracking it (not to mention going in and out of a nasty cold in doing so, doesn't help either). If you can help me out and make it look better than before I'd greatly appreciate. Thank you for you're time.Black BIC Ballpoint (talk) 10:35, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
- @Black BIC Ballpoint: I will take a look at this and try to get a table started for one of the sections as a template. If it's still confusing you after, let me know and I can try to chip away at it. --Drown Soda (talk) 23:48, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
Hi, Drown Soda, thanks for getting things rolling. I still need to take you up on you're "chip away" offer. I can't get the tables and things organized for the next rows to complete the page and plus this cold is kicking my tail pretty hard. If you can do what's left on my behalf and finish it off, I would be SO grateful. Thanks so much!Black BIC Ballpoint (talk) 13:23, 3 February 2018 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Barbara La Marr
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Barbara La Marr you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Numerounovedant -- Numerounovedant (talk) 04:20, 4 February 2018 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Barbara La Marr
The article Barbara La Marr you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Barbara La Marr for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Numerounovedant -- Numerounovedant (talk) 09:01, 4 February 2018 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Hole (band)
The article Hole (band) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Hole (band) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Mike Christie -- Mike Christie (talk) 01:41, 6 February 2018 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:LDR aka Lizzy Grant.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:LDR aka Lizzy Grant.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:37, 6 February 2018 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Burke Canyon
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Burke Canyon you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. epicgenius (talk) 22:23, 6 February 2018 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Oregon State Hospital
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Oregon State Hospital you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Casliber -- Casliber (talk) 13:01, 7 February 2018 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Burke Canyon
The article Burke Canyon you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold 
. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Burke Canyon for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Epicgenius -- Epicgenius (talk) 00:21, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Burke, Idaho
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Burke, Idaho you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. epicgenius (talk) 00:57, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Burke, Idaho
The article Burke, Idaho you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Burke, Idaho for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Epicgenius -- Epicgenius (talk) 01:20, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Burke Canyon
The article Burke Canyon you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Burke Canyon for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. epicgenius (talk) 02:25, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Black Christmas (2006 film)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Black Christmas (2006 film) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ribbet32 -- Ribbet32 (talk) 06:40, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
GA nomination for Butte, Montana
The GA review for one of the articles that you nominated, Talk:Butte, Montana/GA1, was prematurely failed. I have put a replacement nomination on the article's talk page.
There are a few {{citation needed}} tags that the reviewer added when failing this nomination. I suggest that you fix them before the second review is opened. epicgenius (talk) 16:32, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Burke, Idaho
The article Burke, Idaho you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Burke, Idaho for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Epicgenius -- Epicgenius (talk) 23:01, 25 February 2018 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Black Christmas (2006 film)
The article Black Christmas (2006 film) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Black Christmas (2006 film) for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ribbet32 -- Ribbet32 (talk) 00:40, 28 February 2018 (UTC)
Pola Negri
Thank you so much for the contribution and great work that you've done on Pola Negri. I really appreciate it. Best Regards. Oliszydlowski, 15:27, 2 March 2018 (UTC)
- @Oliszydlowski: my pleasure. I noticed the article's reference section had a lot of work to be done and felt obligated. I do a lot of work on actor biographies and try to improve articles in this arena, especially those of people I am interested in or appreciate. I adore Pola. --Drown Soda (talk) 05:39, 2 March 2018 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Black Christmas (2006 film)
The article Black Christmas (2006 film) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Black Christmas (2006 film) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ribbet32 -- Ribbet32 (talk) 03:21, 4 March 2018 (UTC)
Please return to this review at your earliest convenience: there are issues remaining that still need to be addressed. Many thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 02:43, 8 March 2018 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Oregon State Hospital
The article Oregon State Hospital you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Oregon State Hospital for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Casliber -- Casliber (talk) 07:21, 11 March 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for March 13
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Gary Graver, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Posthumous (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:06, 13 March 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for March 20
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Unholy (1988 film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Prince of Darkness (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:05, 20 March 2018 (UTC)
Precious anniversary
 | |
| Love with love | |
|---|---|
| ... you were recipient no. 1623 of Precious, a prize of QAI! |
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:14, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 4
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sandy High School, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Gymnasium and Caucasian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:04, 4 April 2018 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Sandy High School logo.png
Thanks for uploading File:Sandy High School logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:26, 6 April 2018 (UTC)
.
Your 850 edits may be well intentioned but show a bias unfortunately. Many of the statements edited in are not applicable to most markets. Nor do they fit in where they got edited in.
You also don't seem to understand MY and year date changes. Or technical changes. Or why the article was structured the way it was.
In addition respect prior form. Don't change date and author format because you prefer one over the other.
Lastly: Pictures are nice. You will soon find out that putting that many in an article invites others to remove them. Especially certain users that specialise in that. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A04:4540:1708:9C00:F5C9:B0ED:AFE5:BF2 (talk) 10:05, 15 April 2018 (UTC)
- @2A04:4540:1708:9C00:F5C9:B0ED:AFE5:BF2 (talk) -- I added additional information trying to expand on elements of the article that I felt were lacking; apologies if I was doing apparent damage to the article's integrity. Per structure, I was attempting to organize the article in a way similar to other GA articles on vehicles, which typically are organized in chronological order (i.e. first generation, second, etc.)—the Lexus LS article is an example. As far as: "Lastly: Pictures are nice. You will soon find out that putting that many in an article invites others to remove them. Especially certain users that specialise in that."—I don't know if this is supposed to be passive-aggressive, but if so, please spare me the attitude. I've been an editor on here for years and have a fair enough gauge on when it is and isn't appropriate to add images. I see you followed through with your covert threat and deleted the images anyway, which strikes me as spiteful and petty, especially given that there were multiple galleries of images already present in the article long before I even touched it. --Drown Soda (talk) 10:15, 15 April 2018 (UTC)
- Apologies about the picture thing. With the benefit of hindsight - yes, that was worded very poorly. What I more or less wanted to express was that, from past experiences, immideately someone will come and swap things around because one picture of the front of the car is enough so why use two and so on and so forth. The issue with structuring the article the proposed way is the following: Volvo had overlap of model years and year dates (context: A Model year 1996 was build in both year 1995 and year 1996). This is an issue because in some markets, for example the US, the following model S70/V70 was only available as a MY98. Where as in say EU market the S/V70 was available as a MY97. Similar thing with the generation but you changed that. From UK articles I have seen the use of "phase" or "series", from Mercedes-Benz articles the use of the Mopf thing. Both I don't think apply very well to Volvo because changes were made at defined MY changes, or and that is the big issue, at defined week dates. So 96WK52 (52nd week of 1996) was change over for X70. Or 95WK46 was introduction of OBDII but within the same model year. One other issue is with the information itself. Volvo does not do a very good job of this. Unfortunately what is printed in pricelists or brochures is often more of a wish list... For example the first gen XC90 had night vision! At least on paper because it never made it into customer hands. So when you link sources about levels of standard equipment it is quite important to have the context of which market this applies to. The US never got immobilizers, while the Netherlands got them. The image galleries will be added back. I know they were there, I put them there. 2A04:4540:1708:9C00:F5C9:B0ED:AFE5:BF2 (talk) 16:44, 15 April 2018 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Butte, Montana
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Butte, Montana you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Stedil -- Stedil (talk) 22:40, 22 April 2018 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Butte, Montana
The article Butte, Montana you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Butte, Montana for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Stedil -- Stedil (talk) 01:00, 27 April 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 27
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Disappeared episodes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Polaroid (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:34, 27 April 2018 (UTC)
Review trade?
Hi Drown Soda. Just thought i'd offer you a deal. I'd be happy to review your GA nomination of the Brianna Maitland article if you'd review my current GA nomination in return: Death of Ms Dhu. No worries if you're too busy or note interested though. Have a nice day. Freikorp (talk) 22:15, 27 April 2018 (UTC)
- @Freikorp: I would be happy to oblige that offer. I am currently in the midst of getting a rather large article to GA status (or at least attempting to), so I am currently in the throes of that—I'm not sure if you have a time constraint or not, but I could start reviewing the Ms Dhu article sometime early in the upcoming week—possibly earlier? Let me know. --Drown Soda (talk) 22:27, 27 April 2018 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Disappearance of Brianna Maitland
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Disappearance of Brianna Maitland you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Freikorp -- Freikorp (talk) 02:41, 29 April 2018 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Disappearance of Brianna Maitland
The article Disappearance of Brianna Maitland you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Disappearance of Brianna Maitland for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Freikorp -- Freikorp (talk) 07:41, 29 April 2018 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Voxtrot band 2007.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Voxtrot band 2007.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:44, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Disappearance of Brianna Maitland
The article Disappearance of Brianna Maitland you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Disappearance of Brianna Maitland for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Freikorp -- Freikorp (talk) 13:02, 2 May 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for May 4
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
- Death Line (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Pumpkinhead
- Terri Irwin (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Robert Irwin
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:24, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for May 11
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Turistas, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Into the Blue (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 11:40, 11 May 2018 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Butte, Montana
The article Butte, Montana you nominated as a good article has failed 
; see Talk:Butte, Montana for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Stedil -- Stedil (talk) 19:01, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
- This article has passed. This is a bug in Legobot's programming. Stedil (talk) 19:32, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Satyricon Club Logo.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Satyricon Club Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:52, 20 May 2018 (UTC)
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:55, 21 May 2018 (UTC)
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 18:00, 21 May 2018 (UTC)
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:05, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for June 13
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
- Live at the ICA (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Pretty Polly
- Susan Peters (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Hal Erickson
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:13, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:05, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:10, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Susan Peters
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Susan Peters you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of QatarStarsLeague -- QatarStarsLeague (talk) 17:21, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Earle Nelson
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Earle Nelson you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Carabinieri -- Carabinieri (talk) 16:20, 25 June 2018 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Earle Nelson
The article Earle Nelson you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Earle Nelson for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Carabinieri -- Carabinieri (talk) 03:02, 27 June 2018 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Amityville Trilogy art.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Amityville Trilogy art.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:06, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Hostel: Part II
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Hostel: Part II you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Stedil -- Stedil (talk) 19:40, 18 July 2018 (UTC)
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:09, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Cheryl Crane.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Cheryl Crane.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:11, 26 July 2018 (UTC)
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:14, 27 July 2018 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Detour, A Hollywood Story.jpeg
Thanks for uploading File:Detour, A Hollywood Story.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:13, 30 July 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for July 31
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Necromancy (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Magic (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:29, 31 July 2018 (UTC)
Image tagging for File:Majorettes.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Majorettes.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.
To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 12:31, 1 August 2018 (UTC)
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:16, 4 August 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for August 7
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sisters (1973 film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Homage (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:12, 7 August 2018 (UTC)
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:08, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:11, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Drown Soda, it has been over a month since the GA reviewer posted their review of your nominated article. Please post to the review page as to when or whether you plan to address the issues raised in the review, or report on your progress in addressing them. Many thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 02:39, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
- @BlueMoonset: Sorry about this, I somehow missed that the review had been officially posted. I had seen some preliminary comments early last month but missed the notice about the final review. I've addressed it there. --Drown Soda (talk) 03:47, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Susan Peters
The article Susan Peters you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Susan Peters for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of QatarStarsLeague -- QatarStarsLeague (talk) 15:02, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for August 17
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kim Gordon, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Portlandia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:12, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
The file File:Urban Legend soundtrack.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Non-free album covers are generally allowed per WP:NFC#cite_note-3 when they are used for primary identification purposes in a stand-alone article about the album in question, but other non-free uses in other articles typically require that the cover art itself be the subject of sourced critical commentary to provide the context for non-free use required by WP:NFCC#8. Moreover, non-free cover art for movie soundtracks are typically not considered acceptable in subsections of movie articles per WP:FILMSCORE, unless the cover art is itself the subject of sourced critical commentary.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Marchjuly (talk) 08:00, 20 August 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for August 24
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kim Gordon, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Adam Horovitz (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:13, 24 August 2018 (UTC)
Changing citation style and date formats
Per WP:DATERET, please don't change date formats when they are established in an article, as you did at Phantasm (film). Also, please don't change citations formats, per WP:CITEVAR. I'm not really in the mood for more drama, so I'm not going to revert it, but it's not cool to go around changing this stuff without consensus. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 00:48, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
- @NinjaRobotPirate: sorry, I wasn't thinking when I did this--I tried to reorganize the article in a way that made better sense (relocating themes/analysis out of the "production" section, etc.) and reworked the bibliography in/dates in the process. I'll avoid changing dates --Drown Soda (talk) 00:52, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
- Well, I started working on that article a few years ago with the intention of bringing it to GA. Then I got busy with lots of other stuff, and I started working on other articles, too. It obviously needs more work, but I was hoping to return to it eventually. It's not a big deal, of course; it's just that now I have to write everything in a different style. I also get irritable once I've blocked too many vandals, and I have to go through hundreds of changes on my watchlist. I apologize for my irritability. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 01:04, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:18, 26 August 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for August 31
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited In Dreams (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Realism (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 31 August 2018 (UTC)
AfroCine: Join us for the Months of African Cinema in October!
.svg)
Greetings!
You are receiving this message because your username or portal was listed as a participant of a WikiProject that is related to Africa, the Carribean, Cinema or theatre.
This is to introduce you to a new Wikiproject called AfroCine. This new project is dedicated to improving the Wikipedia coverage of the history, works, people, places, events, etc, that are associated with the cinema, theatre and arts of Africa, African countries, the carribbean, and the diaspora. If you would love to be part of this or you're already contributing in this area, kindly list your name as a participant on the project page here.
Furthermore, In the months of October and November, the WikiProject is organizing a global on-wiki contest and edit-a-thon tagged: The Months of African Cinema. If you would love to join us for this exciting event, also list your username as a participant for this event here. In preparation for the contest, please do suggest relevant articles that need to be created or expanded in different countries, during this event!
If you have any questions, complaints, suggestions, etc., please reach out to me personally on my talkpage! Cheers!--Jamie Tubers (talk) 20:50, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for September 7
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
- A Howling in the Woods (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Howling
- Antichrist (film) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Eden
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:04, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Geraldine Page
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Geraldine Page you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Auldhouse -- Auldhouse (talk) 22:40, 11 September 2018 (UTC)
Hi Drown Soda--this is an excellent article and I am glad to promote it to GA status. I'm working on the Women in Green project and hoping we can have it added as a win on that project. Auldhouse (talk) 18:28, 13 September 2018 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Geraldine Page
The article Geraldine Page you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Geraldine Page for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Auldhouse -- Auldhouse (talk) 18:41, 13 September 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for September 14
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited David Warbeck, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Hough (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:13, 14 September 2018 (UTC)
The file File:Amityville Dollhouse soundtrack.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Non-free album cover being used in a decorative manner in Amityville Dollhouse#Musical score. Non-free album cover art is generally allowed to be used for primary identification purposes in stand-alone articles about albums, but its use in other articles is generally only allowed when the cover art itself is the subject of sourced critical commentary as explained in WP:NFC#cite_note-3 and the context for non-free use required by WP:NFCC#8 is evident. There is no such commentary for this particular album cover anywhere in the article, and the use of soundtrack album cover art in articles about films or TV programs is generally not allowed for this reason as explained in WP:FILMSCORE
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- Marchjuly (talk) 07:54, 20 September 2018 (UTC)
Missing person cases in STATE categories
Just as a general personal rule, I don't create new categories unless there are three articles or possible subcategories (or a combination thereof) that could go into them, as a way of staving off overhasty CfDs. That's why I had only created 14 subcategories for Category:Missing person cases in the United States by state at first; the idea was to allow articles from the states that hadn't gotten enough to justify a subcategory to accumulate in a category no one was going to question until they could justify a subcategory.
But, of course, eventually all those subcategories will get enough articles, so I'm not worrying too much about this. Daniel Case (talk) 05:39, 21 September 2018 (UTC)
- @Daniel Case: I wasn't aware of this, but it makes sense. I plugged them into new state-based categories as I figured the majority contained within the general U.S. category hadn't been properly attributed to the states and/or the creators of the articles didn't know how to create a category page. I also presume each category will expand over time as more articles are written though, as you say. --Drown Soda (talk) 05:44, 21 September 2018 (UTC)
- It's not policy or anything, it's just a personal thing, that's why you wouldn't have been aware of it
. Perhaps I am still reacting to the way things were around here a decade ago, when people were (I think ... no, I know, because I definitely was) more zealous about making sure content met the appropriate guidelines for inclusion. Daniel Case (talk) 06:14, 21 September 2018 (UTC)
- It's not policy or anything, it's just a personal thing, that's why you wouldn't have been aware of it
- @Daniel Case: I wasn't aware of this, but it makes sense. I plugged them into new state-based categories as I figured the majority contained within the general U.S. category hadn't been properly attributed to the states and/or the creators of the articles didn't know how to create a category page. I also presume each category will expand over time as more articles are written though, as you say. --Drown Soda (talk) 05:44, 21 September 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Orphaned non-free image File:Emily Patterson crime scene photo.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Emily Patterson crime scene photo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:27, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for September 29
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Cline Falls axe attack, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Deschutes River (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:21, 29 September 2018 (UTC)
Peer review for Lana Turner
I started a peer review for Lana Turner. I am preparing an article for FAN, so going through your article's FAN is worthwhile. I would appreciate any attention you can give to my requested peer review. Since you are going through FAN, your insights are extremely valuable to me. If you can point to issues and provide links, I'd appreciate that.
I went ahead and posted a short comment to stop the clock. I think peer reviews close if there has been no activity for a month. I'll work through the article, but it is as long as my article. I'll try to generate momentum for you! Vyeh (talk) 12:10, 29 September 2018 (UTC)
I added to the peer review. Vyeh (talk) 12:05, 3 October 2018 (UTC)
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:48, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
I can see that you are very interested in American horror films and I was wondering if you would like to review an article I nominated for GA: Wes Craven's The Hills Have Eyes. Thanks for your consideration!MagicatthemovieS (talk) 17:09, 3 October 2018 (UTC)MagicatthemovieS
Welcome to the Months of African Cinema!
Greetings!
The AfroCine Project welcomes you to October, the first out of the two months which has been dedicated to improving contents that centre around the cinema of Africa, the Caribbean, and the diaspora.
This is a global online edit-a-thon, which is happening in at least 5 language editions of Wikipedia, including the English Wikipedia! Join us in this exciting venture, by helping to create or expand articles which are connected to this scope. Also remember to list your name under the participants section, if you haven't done so already.
On English Wikipedia, we would be recognizing Users who are able to achieve the following:
- Overall winner (1st, 2nd, 3rd places)
- Country Winners
- Diversity winner
- High quality contributors
- Gender-gap fillers
- Page improvers
- Wikidata Translators
For further information about the contest, the recognition categories and how to participate, please visit the contest page here. For further inquiries, please leave comments on the contest talkpage or on the main project talkpage. See you around :).--Jamie Tubers (talk) 22:50, 03 October 2018 (UTC)
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 19:25, 7 October 2018 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Sian Barbara Allen Columbo.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Sian Barbara Allen Columbo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:51, 14 October 2018 (UTC)
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:02, 14 October 2018 (UTC)
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:35, 14 October 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 16
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Diary of Ellen Rimbauer (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kate Burton (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 16 October 2018 (UTC)
Hi, Drown Soda! Please take a look at MOS:REFPUNCT, particularly "Where a footnote applies only to material within parentheses, the ref tags belong just before the closing parenthesis."
Thanks! --IJBall (contribs • talk) 00:32, 20 October 2018 (UTC)
| This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |