User talk:Dr. Stephan Poen
April 2010[edit]
I'm going to remove this notice, but please do not blank pages. I've reverted the text of Mariana Nicolesco to an earlier version that was much cleared and, in my opinion, fairer to her. Bradjamesbrown (talk) 16:13, 29 April 2010 (UTC)
Varia / Nicolesco[edit]
Dr Poen, kindly do not go about accusing me of "vandalism"; see WP:AGF for that. I strongly suggest you read WP:MOS, WP:V, WP:CITE, WP:RS, WP:NOT and a whole host of other basic policies before you try your hand at article-writing again. Meanwhile, we're going to have sane versions of articles on this couple — i.e., the version of the Nicolesco article from before your intervention, and the truncated version of the Varia article that I produced. Feel free to expand them to your heart's content, but do not expect to be able to do so unless you actually follow policy. - Biruitorul Talk 22:55, 7 February 2012 (UTC)
- Domnule Poen, nu, nu sunt administrator, dar orice utilizator poate să ia măsuri spre îmbunătățirea enciclopediei, deci acest aspect nu are foarte multă relevanță. Scopul acestei enciclopedii este diseminarea informațiilor, nu promovarea "imaginii României", deși se poate ca al doilea obiectiv să coincidă cu primul. (Sunt sigur că este cazul cu domnul Varia și cu doamna Nicolesco.) Și vă rog frumos, hai să o mai lăsăm moale cu "supunerea atenției unor organisme competente care tutelează valorile naționale" — mă reclamați la DNA? Le spuneți Jandarmeriei să mă ridice din casă? Trimiteți agenți SIE în Florida ca să distrugă server-urile Wikipediei? Nu prea pricep.
- Vă spun ce am să fac. Am să restaurez versiunile afișate de dvs. și am să aștept o anumită perioadă de timp (o săptămână, două, trei) ca să văd dacă articolele vor intra în conformitate cu WP:MOS, WP:V, WP:CITE, WP:RS, WP:NOT și alte politici de bază. (Ca exemplu și poate ca inspirație, Kathleen Ferrier este un articol normal despre o soprană, iar Alexandru Bogdan-Pitești despre un istoric al artei.) Dacă intră, bine; dacă nu, voi fi obligat să intervin iarăși. Vă urez succes, și vă rog să mă întrebați dacă apar nedumeriri. - Biruitorul Talk 19:38, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
Your recent edits[edit]
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button 
or 
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 14:24, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
Talkback[edit]
Message added 15:33, 14 March 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
OlYeller21Talktome 15:33, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
Removal of Maintenance Templates[edit]
Please be advised that removal of the {{COI}} maintenance template is not permitted until the issues are addressed. Please see my talk page for more information but please be advised that continuing to remove the templates may result in your being blocked from editing. OlYeller21Talktome 15:36, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
Nicolesco[edit]
I think I've gotten the Mariana Nicolesco article more or less where it should be: all the essentials are covered, while extraneous information (the exhaustive lists of places she's performed, the repetitive quotes in her praise, the press mentions - which simply are irregular) has been removed. Have a look and see what you think. - Biruitorul Talk 18:00, 17 March 2012 (UTC)
- Am făcut corectările cerute. Vă rog să îmi spuneţi ce mai este de corectat, sau să o faceţi dumneavoastră.
- Apropos, ar fi binevenită o fotografie (sau mai multe) cu domniile lor. Dacă le aveţi, şi dacă sunt făcute de dvs. sau aveţi permisiune pentru a le folosi, le puteţi încărca pe Wikimedia Commons. - Biruitorul Talk 03:15, 18 March 2012 (UTC)
Vă mulţumesc pentru răspunsul Dv. prompt. În mesajul meu v-am precizat că am elaborat deja cele două articole pe o pagină de lucru pe care mi-a pregătit-o user-ul Yeller; acolo veţi putea examina cele două versiuni detailate şi integral argumentate cu note conţinând link-uri active on line. Întru cât aceste două versiuni sunt conform standardelor doresc să le postaţi pe acestea care sunt sistematizate pe capitole iar la articolul sopranei Mariana Nicolesco, la secţiunea discografie, introduceţi tabelul complet realizat de Dv. În legătură cu fotografiile, voi examina materialele în posesie. Insist asupra acestei versiuni foaret complete pentru a evita o muncă inutilă pe acea versiune care conţine încă multe alte erori. Deci vă rog intraţi pe cele două pagini preparate de Yeller şi unde am lucrat respectivele versiuni. Cu mulţumiri, Dr. Stephan Poen Talk 04,28, 18 March 2012 (UTC)
- Informaţiile în cele două versiuni sunt, acum, plus sau minus aceleaşi, numai că versiunea scrisă de mine este mai coerentă, mai concisă si mai în conformitate cu manualul de stil. (Fiind activ pe Wikipedia de vreo şase ani, am idee despre ce vorbesc.) Chiar şi dacă versiunea dvs. nu este acceptată în final, să nu o consideraţi o pierdere de timp, fiindcă am extras multe informaţii din ea. Acum dacă chiar nu e să ne înţelegem asupra unei versiuni, sunt anumite căi pentru a rezolva disputa. În primul rând putem sa îl întrebăm pe Yeller ce părere are el. După aceea, mai e third opinion, Mediation Cabal, etc. - Biruitorul Talk 15:54, 18 March 2012 (UTC)
- Lungimea unui articol este în funcţie de câte informaţii relevante există despre un subiect. Bineînţeles că orice articol despre Doamna Nicolesco va fi mai scurt decât, ştiu şi eu, Gustav Mahler sau Dmitri Shostakovich. Deci nu e vorba că aş impune o anumită lungime, ci pur şi simplu că am scris cam aceleaşi informaţii dar în conformitate cu manualul de stil. L-am înştiinţat pe Yeller despre ultimele noutăţi. Să vedem ce părere are el si, după aceea, sigur că puteţi recurge la un administrator. (Sau chiar înainte; eu nu caut să vă dictez ce să faceţi.) - Biruitorul Talk 17:07, 18 March 2012 (UTC)
- Vă rog frumos, gata cu mesajele, chiar m-am săturat de această discuţie sterilă şi de nervii creaţi. Aşa cum spune autorul articolului despre doamna Ferrier, cineva care a scris 56 de articole de calitate pe Wikipedia şi care ştie despre ce vorbeşte, versiunea dvs. este "pure promotional material and has no place in an encyclopedia", iar mesajele constante de la dvs. constituie "completely unacceptable behaviour". Chiar vă rog să apelaţi direct la administratori - WP:ANI. Eu nu mai am ce spune despre acest subiect şi o-sa ne vedem acolo dacă e cazul. Iar dacă începeţi din nou pe pagina mea de discuţie pe aceeaşi linie, o-să am eu motiv bun să mă duc la ANI.
- În aşteptarea unei colaborări mai placute la Radu Varia, - Biruitorul Talk 14:53, 19 March 2012 (UTC)
WikiProject Romania[edit]
 |
--Codrin.B (talk) 04:25, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
Ar mai fi de finisat bibliografia, dar textul l-am adus aproximativ în conformitate cu cerinţele. Am eliminat sursele care nu erau de încredere şi am mai comasat diverse fraze care conţineau informaţii nu prea relevante. Vă aştept părerile - Biruitorul Talk 04:52, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
Am citit articolul Radu Varia postat de dv. şi, în general, este în regulă. Am efectuat unele modificări şi adăugiri în pagina mea de lucru pe care vă rog să o examinaţi. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Dr._Stephan_Poen/Radu_Varia Dr. Stephan Poen Talk 18,08, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:59, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]
Hello, Dr. Stephan Poen. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]
Hello, Dr. Stephan Poen. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]
Hello, Dr. Stephan Poen. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]
Hello, Dr. Stephan Poen. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message[edit]
| Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message[edit]
| Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |