User talk:Dr.Piyush Parmar

Welcome![edit]

Hi Dr.Piyush Parmar! I would like to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! — Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:46, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Parmar[edit]

Hi, it is important that Wikipedia presents information WP:N neutrally and that it can be verifiedin reliable sources. Your changes at the Parmar article are doing neither of these things and, worryingly, come at around the same time another account has been making similar efforts for what appears to be a similar purpose. Your edits are likely to be reverted, and I suspect you might benefit from a read of WP:MEAT. - Sitush (talk) 13:08, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You are having similar issues at Pawar/Bhoyar, even after I explained the above. Your sources were not reliable and, even if they had been, didn't support the entirety of what you were saying. This entire situation, and the likely off-wiki co-ordination, seems to be driven by sanskritisation. Sitush (talk) 14:00, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

September 2023[edit]

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that one or more recent edit(s) you made did not have an edit summary. You can use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit, or to provide a description of what the edit changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances that your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits, an adequate summary may be quite brief.

The edit summary field looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary, and then click the "Save" button. Thanks! )

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Parmar, you may be blocked from editing. Your contributions to the linked page has been reverted thrice. You might get reported at WP:ANI if this continues. iMahesh (talk) 04:15, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please note[edit]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in South Asian social groups. Due to past disruption in this topic area, the community has authorised uninvolved administrators to impose contentious topics restrictions—such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks—on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, expected standards of behaviour, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on these sanctions. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

- Sitush (talk) 17:19, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Just stop[edit]

You are now trying to create Draft:Kshatriya Pawar, which is another attempt to reproduce your sanskritising claims rejected at articles such as Pawar/Bhoyar and Parmar. Just stop, please: pushing an agenda in this way is highly disruptive. - Sitush (talk) 09:48, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'll just add that we don't write separate articles for castes which use more than one name. What we do is have an article titled after the most commonly used name & we mention in that any other names by which they are known (with reliable sources). We create WP:REDIRECT articles for the less common names and those automatically send the reader who searches for that to the main article.

Almost certainly, Parmar is the most common name for the community also known as Bhoyar, Pawar etc and as such all of these attempts of yours to create content under such titles is bound to fail ... unless you can convince Wikipedia contributors that Parmar isn't in fact the most common.

Furthermore, we never state varna in the lead section of articles, and it is almost always inappropriate in the titles also (articles concerning Brahmins being a notable exception because many Brahmin communities are in fact most commonly known as "X Brahmins" or "Y Brahmins" etc). - Sitush (talk) 10:14, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Joshua Project is not a reliable source, please do not use it and please reply to this message[edit]

See its entry at WP:RSNP. Thanks Doug Weller talk 09:49, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Misrepresentation of source at Draft:Kshatriya Pawar[edit]

Not only do you use an unreliable source, that Joshua Project page[1] does not back the text "Kshatriya Pawar/Pawar/Bhoyar and Bhoyar-Pawar are all names of Pawars". If I find more examples of this I may block you or topic ban you. Doug Weller talk 10:59, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Iam sorry.i didn't knew that. I will remove that citation of Joshuaproject as soon as possible. Dr.Piyush Parmar (talk) 02:29, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This talk page[edit]

Hi, are you reading this talk page? If you don't respond here then it may be necessary to block you from editing articles etc until you do. - Sitush (talk) 18:53, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kshatriya Pawar (September 26)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ibjaja055 was:

This article is another version of Pawar/Bhoyar currently being considered for deletion [[2]]. Check this [[3]] and this [[4]]

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kshatriya Pawar and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Ibjaja055 (talk) 14:30, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Dr.Piyush Parmar! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Ibjaja055 (talk) 14:30, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Ibjaja055 They created the article anyway, after your decline. - Sitush (talk) 03:38, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Sitush Thank you for drawing my attention to it. I have redirected the page to Pawar/Bhoyar that is currently being considered for deletion. If the article is deleted, all the ones on the mainspace would also be deleted too. Ibjaja055 (talk) 04:57, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Dr.Piyush Parmar (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I want to contribute to Wikipedia and hence i will not do the same mistake i did in the past and i will respect other editors opinions. Dr.Piyush Parmar (talk) 12:18, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

A bit more detail about what you did wrong is required, and also you need to say what edits you want to make. PhilKnight (talk) 12:42, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.