User talk:Dporush1

The owner of this account is suspected of abusively using multiple accounts.

(Account information: block log · CentralAuth · suspected sockpuppets · confirmed sockpuppets)

Please do not write or add to an article about yourself, as you apparently did at Danny porush. Creating an autobiography is strongly discouraged – see our guideline on writing autobiographies. If you create such an article, it may be deleted. If what you have done in life is genuinely notable and can be verified according to our policy for articles about living people, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later (see Wikipedians with articles). If you wish to add to an existing article about yourself, please propose the changes on its talk page. Please understand that this is an encyclopedia and not a personal web space or social networking site. If your article has already been deleted, please see: Why was my page deleted?, and if you feel the deletion was an error, please discuss it with the deleting administrator. Thank you. Kolbasz (talk) 11:21, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Danny Porush[edit]

The article Danny Porush has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. JMHamo (talk) 11:59, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest[edit]

Hello, Dporush1. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Danny Porush, you may have a conflict of interest.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:

Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. — CactusWriter ^(talk) 21:44, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Stop editing articles about yourself[edit]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Danny Porush. Sundayclose (talk) 14:59, 13 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Dporush1. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Danny Porush, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:

Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies. Note that Wikipedia's terms of use require disclosure of your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Sundayclose (talk) 14:59, 13 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

March 2015[edit]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Danny Porush. Sundayclose (talk) 15:41, 8 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

March 2017[edit]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Danny Porush, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Sundayclose (talk) 20:12, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

May 2017[edit]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Danny Porush, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Sundayclose (talk) 14:36, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

January 2018[edit]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Danny Porush. It is improper to alter sourced quotations — CactusWriter ^(talk) 19:09, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Edits to Danny Porush[edit]

Dporush1, numerous messages have been left for you about conflict of interest and other problems concerning your edits to Danny Porush. These have included the unexplained removal of sourced information, the addition of unsourced text and persistent edit warring. Please note that you have been previously advised not to edit articles about yourself. (It is assumed that you are this individual.) Please note that you are advised to refrain from editing the article directly and to provide full disclosure of the connection if you comment about the article on talk pages or in other discussions. Of course, if there is a serious error or the article is factually inaccurate than it should be corrected, and there are a number of actions that you can take to do so: send an email to WP:OTRS, Wikipedia's volunteer response team; or ask for help on WP:BLPN, our noticeboard for articles about living persons; or use the talk page of the article in question. In any case, it is expected that you communicate and discuss the article rather than make non-neutral point-of-view edits. Please feel free to ask questions when you require help. Regards. — CactusWriter ^(talk) 19:37, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

December 2019[edit]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Danny Porush. 75.191.40.148 (talk) 02:41, 20 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

February 2021[edit]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Danny Porush. Sundayclose (talk) 20:31, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

This applies to the Danny Porush page only. Mjroots (talk) 21:23, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ANI[edit]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Sundayclose (talk) 20:49, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]