User talk:Dougwalmsley
MfD nomination of User:Dougwalmsley/Doug Walmsley
[edit]User:Dougwalmsley/Doug Walmsley, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Dougwalmsley/Doug Walmsley and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Dougwalmsley/Doug Walmsley during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 00:13, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of User:Dougwalmsley/Doug Walmsley
[edit]
Please do not make articles about a living person that are entirely negative in tone and unsourced. Wikipedia has a policy of verifiability and any negative information we use must be reliably sourced, and our articles must be balanced. Negative unreferenced biographies of living people are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who continue to create or repost such pages and images in violation of our biographies of living persons policy will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. MER-C 04:55, 17 January 2014 (UTC)
Blocked
[edit]
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. I have blocked this account indefinitely because its only contributions were to a virulent attack page targeted against the very individual for whom the user has named the account. To any reviewing administrator, please review deleted contributions. Newyorkbrad (talk) 00:51, 18 January 2014 (UTC)