User talk:Double Uncle Spit Roast Generator

~~February 2009[edit]~~
Welcome to {{Indef}}Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your {{Indef}}recent edits, such as the one you made to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Evansville Trading Post, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any {{Indef}}test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Wuhwuzdat (talk) 00:27, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Please {{Indef}}refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia,{{Indef}} as you did to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dixie Chicken (bar) (2nd nomination). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Wuhwuzdat (talk) 00:28, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Please stop your {{Indef}}disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James Jameson Snodgrass, you will be blocked from editing. Wuhwuzdat (talk) 00:28, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please [[Wikipedia:No personal {{Indef}}attacks|do not attack]] other editors, which you did here: User talk:Wuhwuzdat. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Wuhwuzdat (talk) 00:30, 13 February 2009 (UTC) [reply]

CRAB LEG

My legs are made of a CRAB.

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as those you made {{Indef}}to Charles, Prince of Wales. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. Wuhwuzdat (talk) 00:38, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Account {{Indef}}blocked[edit]

You have been {{Indef}}blocked indefinitely from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding {{Indef}}the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below. Gogo Dodo (talk) 00:45, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Double Uncle Spit Roast Generator (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

It was a mistake. I had created a real and genuine account when my son, irreperably drunk on cheap gin, came stumbling in to my apartment with a live lobster. That little dream slutted and clicked it's pincers onto my keyboard in a deep and brutal expression of his rage. For shame. Let me repair the damage i've done.

Decline reason:

Next time, you'll know to leave the little rubber bands on the claws. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 01:02, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Sockpuppetry case[edit]

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Pickbothmanlol for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. Wuhwuzdat (talk) 17:39, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Attention[edit]

I have been accused of Sockpuppetry but it is not me - and having a look at the page there is no evidence I am invove! Double Uncle Spit Roast Generator (talk) 12:18, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]