Jump to content

User talk:Doom guy007

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

March 2017[edit]

Letting you know that the phrase you attempted to remove in Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice has been in place for quite some time after multiple editors worked on the lead. If you wish to change it, please open a new discussion on the article's talk page. I've restored the content for now. Thank you. --GoneIn60 (talk) 11:10, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding your recent edit... This fact you are trying to insert seems random with the intention of possibly softening the blow of the previous sentence. A lot of film articles do mention the box office total gross, but it's not required and here it isn't necessary. As mentioned above, I suggest you begin a new discussion on the article's talk page if you'd like to state your case. Also, please use an edit summary when you make a change to an article letting others know about the change you're making. Thank you. --GoneIn60 (talk) 04:15, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Doom guy007, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Teahouse logo

Hi Doom guy007! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Cordless Larry (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 3 March 2017 (UTC)

March 2017[edit]

Information icon Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing Wikipedia. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. General Ization Talk 03:30, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon

Your recent editing history at Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. GoneIn60 (talk) 16:58, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop making disruptive edits, as you did at Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. GoneIn60 (talk) 00:58, 18 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop making disruptive edits, as you did at Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice‎.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Ebyabe talk - Welfare State ‖ 17:47, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion[edit]

Information icon Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. --GoneIn60 (talk) 18:26, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

3RR block[edit]

Hi. You've been blocked from editing for 24 hours due to Edit warring. Please be more careful in the future. El_C 19:10, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Batman v Superman[edit]

Please go to the talk about to discuss your addition/change. It has been reverted multiple times and you can be blocked even if your reverts are happening days between each other if it is deemed disruptive. I'm not saying that I'm going to block you (I can't) or that I'm going to report you, but this is getting ridiculous.  BIGNOLE  (Contact me) 19:18, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion[edit]

Information icon Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. --GoneIn60 (talk) 08:30, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

The full report is at the edit warring noticeboard. This block is longer than the first because you continue to make the same revert. You should get consensus on talk for any edits that turn out to be controversial. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 18:32, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]