User talk:Dont say another word

Welcome!

Hello, Dont say another word, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Please see Talk page discussion concerning your recent edit to South Park. Rodhull andemu 17:09, 11 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

South Park[edit]

Kindly stop edit-warring and discuss your changes on the article's Talk page. Rodhull andemu 17:30, 11 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Butters[edit]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on South Park. Users who edit disruptively or refuse to collaborate with others may be blocked if they continue. In particular the three-revert rule states that making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block. If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the talk page to discuss controversial changes. Work towards wording and content that gains consensus among editors. If unsuccessful, then do not edit war even if you believe you are right. Post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.

Please contribute at the discussion here: Talk:South Park#Butters. You are edit warring to reinstate an edit that is not supported by the consensus, continuing to do so may result in a block. Rehevkor ✉ 17:30, 11 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

December 2010[edit]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring, as you did at South Park. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Rodhull andemu 17:55, 11 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 55 hours for edit warring, as you did at South Park. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Rodhull andemu 00:11, 13 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

I still don't see you discussing this edit on its Talk page, just still blindly changing it to your preferred version. That's unacceptable. Rodhull andemu 00:12, 13 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning; the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Uncyclopedia, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. NawlinWiki (talk) 16:10, 20 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unsourced content, as you did to List of Fish Hooks episodes. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. AussieLegend (talk) 02:41, 29 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

January 2011[edit]

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living persons, as you did to Shawn Harrison. Thank you. Sb617 (Talk) 00:24, 16 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Shawn Harrison. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Bento00 (talk) 01:49, 21 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unsourced content, as you did to Nelly. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Please source your entries, and place in appropriate area of infobox. See WP:SOURCE and WP:BURDEN Bento00 (talk) 21:49, 21 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of David Ricci[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on David Ricci requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Bento00 (talk) 21:51, 21 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you're welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Favonian (talk) 21:31, 22 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.

Dont say another word (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

67.168.153.41 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

Vandalism

Blocking administrator: Favonian (talk • blocks)

Decline reason: Account is blocked directly. — Daniel Case (talk) 04:44, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

February 2011[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Amelia Earhart, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Bzuk (talk) 07:34, 6 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at User:Favonian, you may be blocked from editing. Acroterion _(talk) 01:00, 11 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Rodhull andemu 01:11, 11 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]