User talk:Dogma100

Welcome![edit]

Hello Dogma100! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Fbv65e del / ☑t / ☛c

06:20, 3 December 2006 (UTC)

Getting Started
Wikipedia Tutorial • The five pillars of Wikipedia How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Fair use • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Build consensus • Resolving disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community Portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Pages needing attention • Peer review Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Useful templates • Categories • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Tools • User scripts

List of film trilogies[edit]

Why did you delete some film series from the List of film trilogies? — WiseKwai 21:43, 29 January 2007 (UTC) 'I didn't. I was just reverting some of my changes that we deleted.[reply]

Okay, then. Thanks! :-) — WiseKwai 03:25, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Other Rangers, etc.[edit]

Please do not add unsourced rumors, or remove information that was added in between, to Other Rangers and Ranger-like allies, again.—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 23:09, 31 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It's not a rumor. The orange ranger actually appeared on the show. Check the episode "Boom"

Boom is a fake ranger, and nothing is known about his powers, etc. Also, do not perform copy-paste moves as you did from Once a Ranger to Once A Ranger, again.—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 20:54, 3 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Of course he's a fake ranger, but his costume's real. You could at least mention that and it would be better if the page was Once A Ranger.

Actually, no, it wouldn't. Grammatically, the "a" stays lowercase, and official sites with the episode title on its schedule, like TVGuide.com, use that spelling. As for Boom, the official outfit was a dream sequence, and in the real "battle", he wasn't in any form or fashion a real Ranger, in PR mythos or in S.P.D.'s command chain. Arrowned 23:23, 4 August 2007 (UTI

If you read my page edit, you'll see that I clearly stated that the orange ranger only appeared in a dream sequence.

Stop adding him, and don't sign out to add him, either. Boom does not count and is not listed.—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 04:52, 5 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Stop adding trivia to articles.—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 01:09, 8 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Why?(----)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Dogma100 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Ryulong has unfairly blocked my account. All the edits I have made have been legitimate. The administrator hasn't looked at my edits or read the sources I gave him but automatically assumes them to be false.

Decline reason:

You consistantly rejected warnings about your contributions. Most relevant policies and guidelines: Wikipedia:Avoid trivia sections, Wikipedia:Verifiability, Wikipedia:Reliable sources and Wikipedia:No original research. — Vassyana 18:48, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Dogma100 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I really don't understand what I did wrong. Everything that i put down was verifiable and all i put are relevant information. The orange ranger actually appeared on screen and i even put a disclaimer stating that he was only in a dream sequence. Even though he wasn't part of the "real" Power Rangers universe it is still worth mentioning. The S.P.D. rangers would still have been mentioned even if at the end of the series it was all revealed to be a dream. About the trivia sections, I included them because past users deleted them without explanation, and there is information there that is still useful. And I notice that those same trivia sections came back in the Power Rangers pages just under a different name like "uniqueness". Even the Wikipedia policy itself states not to delete these sections but work the relevant information into other sections of the article.

Decline reason:

See above for the decline reason. Do not abuse the unblock template. — -Royalguard11(T·R!) 19:54, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

AfD nomination of List of film series with two entries[edit]

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is List of film series with two entries. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of film series with two entries (3rd nomination). Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:04, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]