User talk:Doctorwho16
Please don't recreate the Untitled Drake Bell and Josh Peck Project article until there are multiple published reliable sources for the project that can be cited to provide proper verifiability. Thanks, Gwernol 22:45, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
The article Unkeljam has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article seemed to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.
Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Gwernol 22:46, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
From Roots to Fruits[edit]
This article was deleted because of a prior deletion discussion found here. Please review what Wikipedia is not, particularly this section. -- Merope 08:57, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
AfD nomination of Suga Mama[edit]
An editor has nominated Suga Mama, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").
Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Suga Mama and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).
You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 15:16, 24 January 2008 (UTC)