User talk:Doberman Pharaoh

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Doberman Pharaoh, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  --Ugur Basak 22:44, 12 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Asprilla1.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Asprilla1.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:20, 13 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Steve Howey.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Steve Howey.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
  2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Chowbok 17:34, 11 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Munich[edit]

Would you like to help out with WikiProject Munich? Any kind of help is appreciated. Kingjeff 01:46, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

{{fc|xxx}} [edit]

Hi Doberman - I note that you have amended many football articles to replace [[xxx F.C.|xxx]] with {{fc|xxx}}. Can I refer you to the recent comments made at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Football#fc which says that "All instances of {{fc}} should be subst'ed anyway". It seems to me that you are doing a lot of work replacing a direct link to a club article with a link via a template, which doesn't have any direct visual effect.

I also note that you are amending dates in infoboxes to show "2000–01" using "2000 &n dash; 01" rather than 2000-2001. I know the player template uses your style but just about everyone else appears to be using the latter; for what it's worth, my personal opinion is that using the full date looks far better, whereas the Lee Bowyer (for example) infobox now looks "ragged" with dates switching between 4 digit and 2 digit.

Just my thoughts at the end of a busy day. Best wishes Daemonic Kangaroo 17:16, 18 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It is not a new idea. The Template talk:Fc page has recommended the subst: usage for a long time. Changing to use the templates is a waste of time, as there are bots which sometimes go through and fix things back to the substituted format anyway. Neier 02:06, 23 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:G94996eef61.jpg)[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:G94996eef61.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 11:16, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, Dobey, you're so silly[edit]

<3, blind51de

Links to thechocolatereview.wordpress.com[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, the external links you added to the page Toblerone do not comply with our guidelines for external links. Wikipedia is not a mere directory of links; nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. --McGeddon 14:10, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD Nomination: Ritchie Sutton[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, but all Wikipedia articles must meet our criteria for inclusion (see What Wikipedia is not and Deletion policy). Since it does not seem that Ritchie Sutton meets these criteria, an editor has started a discussion about whether this article should be kept or deleted.

Your opinion on whether this article meets the inclusion criteria is welcome. Please contribute to the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ritchie Sutton. Don't forget to add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of each of your comments to sign them.

Discussions such as these usually last five days. In the meantime, you are free to edit the content of the article. Please do not remove the "articles for deletion" template (the box at the top). When the discussion has concluded, a neutral third party will consider all comments and decide whether or not to delete the article. Mattythewhite 18:10, 16 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I re-created the article now he is a professional with Port Vale. If you have any more info then feel free to add to the article. Cheers.--EchetusXe 22:57, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

0 template[edit]

Hi. On some of the articles you've been editing recently, I think you have been adding too many 0 templates to footballers infoboxes. I don't think each row needs two 0 templates, regardless of what the stats actually are. Thanks, Mattythewhite 20:59, 17 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think at least that's how it's meant to be done. I'll give you a link to one of my archived talk pages, where I was informed of it. Hope it helps. Mattythewhite 21:12, 17 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Football infobox standards[edit]

Hi, just to let you know about the Wikipedia Football Project Player Manual of Style, which includes an agreed standard for football player infoboxes. The word 'loan' should not appear in italics. Also, the endash (as opposed to the hyphen) is used between two years. WP:DASH has more info on this. Apologies if this all seems a bit pedantic, but the idea is to give a consistent look and feel to football player articles. Cheers and happy editing. --Jameboy 17:12, 21 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:G37664nqxa6.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:G37664nqxa6.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 22:23, 6 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Spiritual beggars demons.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Spiritual beggars demons.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 17:12, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi - I see that you have been creating several new articles - thanks for these contributions. It would help if you added each new article that you create to the list at Wikipedia:WikiProject Football/New articles so that other editors can have the benefit of your hard work. Cheers! --Daemonic Kangaroo 17:37, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Notability of Sam Linton[edit]

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Sam Linton, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Sam Linton seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Sam Linton, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 18:01, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Andy Clarke[edit]

Hi, and well done for cleaning up Andy Clarke's article. Thought you may want to know that year ranges such as football seasons are supposed to be separated with a long dash – ( which you can write &ndash; ) rather than a hyphen - . So next time you find an infobox in a mess, you could correct that as well if you wanted. It's also a good idea if you fill in the edit summary box, so people know what changes you've made. Just something like "tidied infobox" would do, if that's what you've done.

If you add a career total line to a player's appearances, it'd probably be a good idea if you only did it for players where all their appearances and goals are present. With Andy Clarke, his Barnet apps and goals aren't there, so putting a total is misleading.

Keep up the good work! cheers, Struway2 (talk) 15:25, 14 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Roy Aitken[edit]

Hi, I wondered what source you had for changing the year in which Roy Aitken joined Newcastle United from 1990 to 1989? According to the Scottish FA page cited in the article he joined in early 1990, and this article from The Times has the move due to be completed on 10 January 1990. Anyway, I'm changing it back, on the basis of the Times article. cheers, Struway2 (talk) 08:56, 11 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

no problem! cheers, Struway2 (talk) 13:10, 11 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oxford Wikimania 2010 and Wikimedia UK v2.0 Notice[edit]

Hi,

As a regularly contributing UK Wikipedian, we were wondering if you wanted to contribute to the Oxford bid to host the 2010 Wikimania conference. Please see here for details of how to get involved, we need all the help we can get if we are to put in a compelling bid.

We are also in the process of forming a new UK Wikimedia chapter to replace the soon to be folded old one. If you are interested in helping shape our plans, showing your support or becoming a future member or board member, please head over to the Wikimedia UK v2.0 page and let us know. We plan on holding an election in the next month to find the initial board, who will oversee the process of founding the company and accepting membership applications. They will then call an AGM to formally elect a new board who after obtaining charitable status will start the fund raising, promotion and active support for the UK Wikimedian community for which the chapter is being founded.

You may also wish to attend the next London meet-up at which both of these issues will be discussed. If you can't attend this meetup, you may want to watch Wikipedia:Meetup, for updates on future meets.

We look forward to hearing from you soon, and we send our apologies for this automated intrusion onto your talk page!

Addbot (talk) 20:12, 30 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:F42316pph7b.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:F42316pph7b.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
  • That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 02:29, 11 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of John Martin (footballer born 1979)[edit]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article John Martin (footballer born 1979), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Jmorrison230582 (talk) 14:30, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Alex Dyer (footballer born 1989), and it appears to be very similar to another wikipedia page: Alex Dyer (footballer born 1990). It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 14:04, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback[edit]

Hello, Doberman Pharaoh. You have new messages at Jéské Couriano's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Liam Cooper speedy deletion[edit]

Hi. I'm not 100% sure if it counts, but Liam Cooper has played a first-team game in the League Cup, and I think this means he is notable. Beve (talk) 14:35, 15 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Youngsters aren't on loan anymore[edit]

Template:Stoke City F.C. squad. Is this right?

I was wondering where you got your info from? Grocott played for Rangers yesterday and Thorley only recently went out to Burscough. What makes you think the 3 of them have suddenly returned?--EchetusXe (talk) 15:56, 16 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yeh, Stokes website seems to ignore the youngsters for some reason, even reported Grocott as going to Stafford Rangers when he went to Alfreton Town (he later went to Rangers after failing to make the Town first team), numerous footie sites then reported it because they got their info off the site.

Only reason I care is because I was in Marcs class at school.--EchetusXe (talk) 16:23, 16 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Carl Cort[edit]

Hi, you added Carl Cort's statistics for UD Marbella as 7 apps and 1 goal. However, I cannot find any record of him scoring for them, can you confirm this?

EDIT: OK thanks for the info

Some recognition.[edit]

The Working Man's Barnstar
For tirelessly updating the stats of what seems like every footballer who has an article. Everywhere I turn, I see Doberman Pharaoh: "Updated club stats". – Toon(talk) 18:24, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

England u20[edit]

Hi, noticed you adding U20 stats to players' articles, but without adding a source. Where are you getting the figures from? apart from verifiability considerations, I've been after a comprehensive reliable source for England youth apps for ages, as the FA are worse than useless. cheers, Struway2 (talk) 21:38, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Presumably that only gives FIFA competitions though, not friendlies? cheers, Struway2 (talk) 21:50, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with File:250px-Cm0102.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:250px-Cm0102.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
  • That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 06:04, 2 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Names/nicknames[edit]

Hi there PHARAOH, VASCO here,

Regarding this article, Pedro Pelé, i noticed you reverted my edits, and re-instated his name as PEDRO PELÉ, which is an impossibility, because it's a name/nickname compound, therefore just PELÉ is more accurate.

I am Portuguese, judging from your user page you are British; let me tell you man, maybe that is how he is known in England, but i think it's a false lead introduced by Portuguese media, which have already wrongly named players in this fashion: Pedro Pauleta, Nuno Capucho, and it stuck in another countries (this case England).

However, after this explanation, if you revert it to PEDRO PELÉ again, since i respect your work and wish no edit wars, will leave it be. I would like to hear your views on this (and related) subject, though.

Cheers, have a nice week,

VASCO AMARAL - --NothingButAGoodNothing (talk) 16:45, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

PEDRO PELE[edit]

Hey DOBERMAN, VASCO here,

No worries my wiki-friend, nice teamwork!! I did not say it was an edit war man, just wanted to avoid one (can never be too careful these days :)).

Keep up the good work, whistle if you need anything,

VASCO AMARAL - --NothingButAGoodNothing (talk) 23:49, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Request[edit]

Hi there PHARAOH, VASCO again

Speaking of teamwork, i have a request man, am going really crazy over an article...Could you please check Roberto Solozábal, it's really mind-boggling: no-one edited after me (if you check edit history, you will see an anon IP, it's mine), it was fine after i left it, and now INFOBOX is all screwed up - I removed height format to see if it would fix, and the problem switched to birthdate...WOW! Am really at a loss here, could you help me? (don't forget to reinstate HEIGHT FORMAT please)

Ty very much in advance,

VASCO AMARAL - --NothingButAGoodNothing (talk) 05:23, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • WOW!! And also in Abelardo Fernández, same infobox woes, could you have a look here 2? After you fix it, please enlighten me, so that i won't have to bother again and take matters into my own hands. Thanks again.

--NothingButAGoodNothing (talk) 05:30, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, do you have a source for Mickaël Buscher being the player's full name? cheers, Struway2 (talk) 20:50, 6 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Or for Ben Wright (footballer born 1988) please? Mattythewhite (talk) 10:26, 20 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs[edit]

Hello Doberman Pharaoh! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 3 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 943 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

  1. Calum Brady - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  2. Graham Guy - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  3. Mark Stewart (footballer) - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 16:49, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Paul McManus (Scottish footballer) for deletion[edit]

The article Paul McManus (Scottish footballer) is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul McManus (Scottish footballer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. J Mo 101 (talk) 12:42, 14 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot[edit]

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Add sources
Republic of Ireland national football team
Equipment manager
2010–11 in English football
PAE AEL FC
UEFA Team of the Year
FIFPro
Cleanup
Danny Grainger
2008–09 in English football
Enner Valencia
Expand
Jay-Jay Okocha
Club Brugge KV
House (season 1)
Unencyclopaedic
Alessandro Del Piero
Racism in association football
Regional Rail Link
Wikify
Josh Carson
History of Liverpool F.C.
Jeroen Tesselaar
Orphan
Leon Crooks
Marc Leach
Gary Wraight
Merge
The Lost Tomb of Jesus
Licca-chan
Extramural
Stub
Kim Shin-wook
Cameron Murray (footballer)
Elgin High School (Scotland)
Keith Ryan
1967–68 Football League Cup
José Fágner Silva da Luz

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 21:28, 20 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:39, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Graham Guy[edit]

The article Graham Guy has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Hasn't played at a fully professional level. WP:FOOTYN

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jmorrison230582 (talk) 15:27, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article Callum Brady has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Never played in a fully professional match (WP:NFOOTY). Highest level he played at was Scottish Second Division (third tier), which is mostly semi-professional.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jmorrison230582 (talk) 05:44, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Doberman Pharaoh. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Doberman Pharaoh. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Gary Greenhill for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gary Greenhill is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gary Greenhill until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

1keyhole (talk) 17:33, 15 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]