User talk:Digimanst

Welcome!

Hello, Digimanst! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message. (talk to me) (contributions) @ 08:22, 27 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions New contributors' help page Where to: ask questions • make requests Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Simplified Manual of Style • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community (The Signpost)
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Speedy deletion nomination of Singtel CIS (Corporate Individual Scheme)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Singtel CIS (Corporate Individual Scheme), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Gaijin42 (talk) 00:32, 10 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reply

Hi, thanks for message. I deleted your article because

it did not provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that it meets the notability guidelines. Although you gave two references, one was a dead link and the other did not mention your company. The article is otherwise unsourced, although it seems to be based on the scheme's own website, hardly an independent third-party source.
it was written in a promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic.

I can see nothing factual about the scheme, such as the cost to the company or the level of take-up, it's just promoting the scheme
You just list the supposed benefits, as described by the scheme itself(!), but there is no independent verification of these, or any hint of drawbacks.
Examples of unsourced claims presented as fact include: ...exclusive phone models, competitive price plans and free value-added services... offered to selected companies to raise employee satisfaction... may result in various benefits including reduced turnover and higher employee productivity... enjoying savings

In its current form it's basically a fact-free promotion of the scheme either unsourced or based uncritically on the scheme's own website Jimfbleak - talk to me? 10:04, 10 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Text is here. Remember that you have no working references that support anything you have said about the scheme. Also note that having sections headed "Benefits" is a high-risk strategy Jimfbleak - talk to me? 05:58, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I made this edit to tidy up. It looks much better, move to article space when you are ready. use the "move" button, don't cut-and-paste. Unless it's resolved, restore the merge template when you do so (double {{ at start, double }} at end) Jimfbleak - talk to me? 12:55, 22 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Singtel CIS (Corporate Individual Scheme) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Singtel CIS (Corporate Individual Scheme) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Singtel CIS (Corporate Individual Scheme) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Gaijin42 (talk) 14:16, 31 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]