User talk:Dibo/archive 2

I am in fact the Ehinger..... furthermore I agree that I should be banned. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 60.225.218.210 (talk • contribs) 16:23, 5 September, 2006 (UTC)

that's nice Dibo 07:16, 5 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

A-League Newsletter II, 2006

WikiProject A-League Newsletter
Issue II – September 2006

Current Player project status
10% complete

A-League News

The 2006-07 A-League season is now two rounds old, with the early front-runners being Queensland Roar and Melbourne Victory.

Adelaide United won the Pre-Season Cup, defeating Central Coast Mariners 5-4 on penalties.

Project News

The Player project has been moved, overhauled and refined. It now is not limited to the 2005-06 player list. However, only 10% of articles are considered "complete", and hopefully we can get this figure to approach 100% by the end of the season.

Major changes to the layout of the 2006-07 A-League season page have taken place recently, and an infobox created. A table for attendances, as well as top scorer etc. are now in place. All users are encouraged to update the scores for completed matches as they come in.

Recently, Perth Glory F.C. was moved to Perth Glory FC after no objections were raised at the Wikiproject talk page. All links to the old page (including various templates) were changed.

The project requires pictures of games and stadiums to help improve articles. Any pictures are much appreciated.

The A-League Portal has been set up. Feel free to update the scores, and make sure you check out the selected article and picture each fortnight.

The football (soccer) barnstar has recently became the official award of the Wikiproject. Feel free to hand it out to anyone you see making excellent contributions to all things A-League related.

Since the last newsletter was distributed (on August 5, 2006), four new members have graced our ever-growing list: Wantok (talk · contribs), Ronan.evans (talk · contribs), Tiefighter (talk · contribs) and Mattythewhite (talk · contribs). To these new users, welcome from all the Wikiproject members!

Shotcuts

WP:A-L → WikiProject A-League

WP:A-L/T → WikiProject A-League talk

WP:A-L/PP → WikiProject A-League player project

WP:A-L/RC → Changes to A-League articles

P:A-L → A-League Portal

High-importance articles

A-League

A-League 2006-07

A-League team articles

Individual team's 2006-07 articles

High-importance templates

Template:A-League 2006-07 Position Ladder

Signed,

AlbinoMonkey ^(Talk)

Daniel .Bryant

06:58, 8 September 2006 (UTC)

Banning

You should be banned. You contribute slightly more than NIL except for stalking things that do not even exist. hahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahahahah

07:27, 1 October 2006 (UTC)Topcattheirrefutable

The Ehinger and sockpuppets

You may be interested to see a message posted on my talk page from Topcattheirrefutable. There he admits to having sockpuppets. I replied on his talk page. Thought you'd be interested, especially considering i noticed that there hasn't been a conclusion yet on the sockpuppetry evidence page. CattleGirl 07:56, 4 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Dibo, thanks for the heads-up - I wasn't aware of ehinger and am reading it all now. I've blocked the topcat account FYI. -- I@n 03:14, 13 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

In the meantime, SG has requested the case be re-opened. Will watch with interest. -- I@n 03:43, 13 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Reference

Cheers for fixing up that reference with the CCMFC article. I was restructuring the whole sentence (it was very POV, how it was), but it's good to see interest in the article. I nominated it for Football Collaboration of the Week a little while ago, and it looks like it will make it - I reckon that it could be the first FA for the Wikiproject. Anyways, thanks, and keep up the good work, Daniel.Bryant ^{[ T · C ]} 05:46, 10 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Bob Debus

I don't know if you are unaware of how Parliamentary Privilege works, or you're just a Labor hack. See here:

http://www.news.com.au/story/0,10117,20771001-421,00.html?from=public_rss

http://www.news.com.au/story/0,10117,20773189-1702,00.html?from=public_rss

http://www.news.com.au/story/0,10117,20769674-1702,00.html?from=public_rss

http://www.news.com.au/story/0,10117,20769367-2,00.html?from=public_rss

http://www.news.com.au/story/0,10117,20768918-29277,00.html?from=public_rss

http://www.news.com.au/story/0,10117,20768386-2,00.html?from=public_rss

http://search.smh.com.au/click.ac?u=http%3A%2F%2Fsmh.com.au%2Fnews%2FNATIONAL%2FAllegations-against-Debus-groundless%2F2006%2F11%2F17%2F1163266743127.html&t=4&n=1&s=debus

http://search.smh.com.au/click.ac?u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.smh.com.au%2Fnews%2Fnational%2Fmembers-at-war%2F2006%2F11%2F16%2F1163266697956.html&t=4&n=2&s=debus

http://search.smh.com.au/click.ac?u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.smh.com.au%2Fnews%2Fnational%2Fgrub-debnam-names-debus%2F2006%2F11%2F16%2F1163266680649.html&t=4&n=3&s=debus

http://search.smh.com.au/click.ac?u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.smh.com.au%2Fnews%2Fnational%2Fprove-your-slurs-labor-tells-debnam%2F2006%2F11%2F16%2F1163266711080.html&t=4&n=4&s=debus

http://search.smh.com.au/click.ac?u=http%3A%2F%2Fsmh.com.au%2Fnews%2FNATIONAL%2FDebnam-under-attack-over-Debus-claim%2F2006%2F11%2F16%2F1163266681432.html&t=4&n=5&s=debus

http://search.theage.com.au/click.ac?u=http%3A%2F%2Ftheage.com.au%2Fnews%2FNATIONAL%2FAllegations-against-Debus-groundless%2F2006%2F11%2F17%2F1163266743127.html&t=4&n=1&s=debus

http://search.theage.com.au/click.ac?u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.theage.com.au%2Fnews%2Fnational%2Fgrub-debnam-names-debus%2F2006%2F11%2F16%2F1163266681460.html&t=4&n=2&s=debus

http://search.theage.com.au/click.ac?u=http%3A%2F%2Ftheage.com.au%2Fnews%2FNATIONAL%2FDebnam-under-attack-over-Debus-claim%2F2006%2F11%2F16%2F1163266681432.html&t=4&n=3&s=debus

http://search.theage.com.au/click.ac?u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.theage.com.au%2Fnews%2Fnational%2Fgutless-grub-nsw-row-turns-ugly%2F2006%2F11%2F16%2F1163266712944.html&t=4&n=4&s=debus

http://www.news.com.au/dailytelegraph/story/0,22049,20770673-5001021,00.html

http://www.news.com.au/dailytelegraph/story/0,22049,20771001-5005941,00.html

http://www.news.com.au/dailytelegraph/story/0,22049,20768916-5001021,00.html

http://www.abc.net.au/news/newsitems/200611/s1790635.htm

http://www.abc.net.au/news/newsitems/200611/s1790547.htm

http://www.abc.net.au/news/newsitems/200611/s1790272.htm

http://larvatusprodeo.net/2006/11/16/debnam-names-debus/

http://blueberryfool.blogspot.com/2006/11/peter-debnam-could-lose-race-of-one.html

http://juliesblog17.spaces.live.com/Blog/cns!1673CB0833821492!1983.entry

http://www.rowen.id.au/blog/2006/11/peter-debnam-is-a-goose/

http://phyo-phyo.blogspot.com/2006/11/debnam-says-debus-is-under.html

http://starshark.blogging.com/blog/_archives/2006/11/16/2503899.html

http://theop-inion.blogspot.com/2006/11/debnam-deadbeat.html

Stating that an allegation was made is clearly not libellous. I will be restoring the information as well as including Debus' admission that he was investigated for paying an underage boy for sex. Please don't touch it until you have a better grasp on Parliamentary Privilege. --219.89.44.200 22:28, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Mediation Case

Cheers for raising the request for mediation :) BTW did you get to see the "great" Romario play at Gosford? The SMH was rather scathing about his performance. 13:46, 27 November 2006 (UTC)

If I was in Sydney I would come up to Gosford, but after the World Cup I moved to Edinburgh :) I know what you mean about frustration at the moment, but I have noticed the more often he posts, the more often others clean up as well. Tancred 22:42, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm about to add User:Topcattheirrefutable to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Ehinger222 (2nd) Tancred 09:43, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

And another one User:Caesar34 :( Tancred 11:26, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Is this all you ever do on wiki Dibo, LOL. To read you I am the antichrist as well.

[1], Dibo, it was nice to look through your contributions and find this, lol, you are really starting to develop a complex. I suppose I am the source of all things rugby league football is not soccer to you, haha. Do you understand the concept of pelican droppings? That if you leave a trace here, it will be found by another and another and than snowball? Like the recent commentary over Alan Oakley using comments from http://www.stoush.net?? I do not believe that evidence by the way because I remember it being changed in November of last year. Anyways, good luck with the sockpuppet case. Another strike for righteous indignation in this overly rude world. --Caesar34 11:31, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

your [here] is a dead giveaway - misspelling 'common' as 'commen' is a dead giveaway. see [first sockpuppet page about you]:

"stereotypical misspellings, like 'commen' and common style of edits and comments on talk pages"

so... there it is again. Dibo ^{T | C} 11:36, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

please substitute vandal templates

Hi. I saw that you added this template ({{test2-n|Australian Labor Party}}) to User talk:61.8.46.16. Please remember to substitute such templates. Use the templates at WP:VAND so that you instead place a template similar to this: {{subst:test2|Australian Labor Party}}. Cheers, Jpe ob 00:53, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Mediation Cabal

Hello, I am going to be one of the mediators listening to your case. Please see Alan Oakley Mediation Cabal to participate in this voluntary mediation. Somitho 21:46, 17 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

LMAO

Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Ehinger222 (2nd), dude, you are getting delusional! --Ehinger222 05:40, 17 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

He has been back for about a week now, but until yesterday was just tweaking 3 articles each day. I'm not sure how we go about banning an IP range. I can be done but I would assume there would need to be checks to see if other users are using any of the IP's. I'm going to put together a case again today, as Ehinger222 has created 3 socks in the last week alone.Tancred 09:07, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please calm down

The message you left at my talk could very easily be interpreted as abuse. Please calm down, or I will have no other option than to report you to an administrater. I think that what is happenning here is a case of mistaken identity, that is the only reason I have not sought out an administrater yet. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 144.132.217.29 (talk) 10:56, 22 March 2007 (UTC).[reply]

go completely bananas. don't care. am too sick of cleaning up your bullshit edits to be at all perturbed if a ban means i can't. you're nothing but a source of pollution to wikipedia. Dibo ^{T | C} 10:58, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

oh, and it's administrator. FFS - learn to spell. Dibo ^{T | C} 11:00, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

By the tone of your responsive message, I see you have little interest in stopping the abuse and wikiharassment. I have therefor left a note at the administraters webpage.

like i said - care factor = 0. piss off. Dibo ^{T | C} 11:18, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't abuse contributors. The best way to report vandalism is to WP:AIV. Please do that in future. – Riana ^ঋ 11:24, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Which pages are these? – Riana ^ঋ 11:30, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, mate. I'll keep an eye on the IP ranges, and all the pages he edits. I know it's frustrating, but we have to be nice even to the complete maniacs :( – Riana ^ঋ 11:41, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

new checkuser

Thanks for adding the new checkuser request. I'm not sure what was missed in the last request, but the admins involved seem to do 200-300 edits a day, making it almost impossible to scan their contributions to find what was needed.Tancred 14:31, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What was missed was any evidence. I am not a sockmaster with a vast array of puppets. Your presentation of evidence is so unscrupulous and dishonest that I am sure anybody who views it with proper investigation would dismiss it out of hand which has now happenned three times. I think I have a very good case for arguing that yourself and Tancred stop reverting the pages that I edit, as any reversion is laced with personal abuse, personal attacks and is not based on reasonable argument, working towards a consensus on talk pages and all the other decent rules on wikipedia. If my edits are objectionable(as they well may be, I am only a woman with what may be my own prejudices that I seek to avoid when editing), please take your objections to a third person so that they can be judiciously treated. I have been banned twice, both overturned, for accusations that you have made. If you do not stop harassing my edits with personal attacks etcetera, I may have to ask an admin that you be banned. Thanks in advance 144.132.219.160 05:25, 30 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Footy

Your edit at footy was good. I had heard of that game before, but I thought it was written "footie". It was good to see you back contributing without the personal abuse. --144.132.216.253 06:39, 10 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

CCM

Heya Dibo.

I reverted here. The reason why is that, although Kiernan is the president, there is no "president=" field in the infobox. By changing "chairman=" (which works) to "president=" (which doesn't), the Kiernan field disappears.

I'll have a look to see if I can fix how this works, so that we can have a "president=" input field which will actually work.

Cheers, Daniel 08:40, 19 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dibo

You dont even go to Gosford High School anymore daniel you wikipedia loser.

you left because nobody liked you.

This should be interesting

Judging from all the edits all the usernames have made we have very very busy Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Tancred

Elvisandhismagicpelvis

I'd like to see the issues each of us have had with Elvisandhismagicpelvis (talk · contribs) sorted out sooner rather than later, because I don't see it being resolved any time soon. I'm going to propose taking this to a WP:RFCC. I originally posted on CSN, but it was suggested that RfC would be more appropriate. If I put together a write up that you're happy with (based on this one), would you, in principle, be willing to certify it? Mark Chovain 02:40, 26 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Jets squad

Please dont edit such copious ammounts of pages without starting a discussion on one of the talk pages about it first. Just because you cant find anything about it doesnt mean its not verifiable. Perhaps you could have just marked the pages as needing a reference. Jared Wiltshire 01:58, 3 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There is no citation supplied, and outside of WP there is nothing to go on but rumour. Google websearches and google news show nothing of the signings. WP and the squadron forum are the only sources available. Anyone living outside of Newcastle could conclude that it's all rubbish, like the signings of Collymore and Venables were, or even Livio Prieto. Don't believe everything that NUJFC or Newcastle media tell you.

Since your reverts am going through and adding ^{[citation needed]} tags instead. Dibo ^{T | C} 02:02, 3 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Not a problem. Bear in mind though that just because you cant find anything on the web about it, it doesn't mean its not true and not verifiable. And I think the Newcastle media is reliable enough, newspapers and news on tv is considered a source of information (AFAIK). Prieto and Barros both did agree to terms with us as reported by Newcastle media, and that was all that was ever claimed.Jared Wiltshire 02:14, 3 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Agreeing to terms is not signing, but I'm happy to compromise - have no wish to be disruptive. If you're not sure on the rules on sources, check out WP:Verifiability. It's a clear and ~~simply~~ simple guide. Cheers, Dibo ^{T | C} 02:18, 3 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well it does mean they have expressed they intent to play for the club. They just haven't been able to physically sign the contract papers (cause they're overseas). Anyhow, seems like we have it sorted. I'll try and add some references where I can. Jared Wiltshire 02:43, 3 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No wuckers, geronimo. Dibo ^{T | C} 02:50, 3 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Reply

As a wikipedian contributor, I do not dislike or like any particular person, I just assume good faith. The pages that you were contributing to may or may not have been unsourced. That is not my business. What is, is to make sure that pages that are unsourced become sourced, or else potentially libelous material be identified and deleted. You are not above the law! --Tomasthetankengine 03:30, 10 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]