User talk:Deontray hunter

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Thisis my talk page. this is were you post messages for me.

File:I am a proud Wikipedian.jpg listed for deletion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:I am a proud Wikipedian.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Kelly hi! 10:02, 6 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

March 2015[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm ToonLucas22. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to User:Da_nuke— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. TL22 (talk) 22:29, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia![edit]

Hello, Deontray hunter, and welcome to Wikipedia!

An edit that you recently made to Wikipedia:About seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox.

Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or type {{Help me}} on your talk page here, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --Mrjulesd (talk) 22:29, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

June 2015[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm AddWittyNameHere. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Jenny Staley Hoad— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. AddWittyNameHere (talk) 21:21, 3 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Jenny Staley Hoad with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. AddWittyNameHere (talk) 21:24, 3 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to 1954 Australian Championships with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. AddWittyNameHere (talk) 21:25, 3 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Materialscientist (talk) 21:38, 3 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Deontray hunter (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

These edits were really not made by me like seriously they weren't. im not even lying. Really... This actually happened to me before.. i left to go somewhere while i was still logged into wikipedia. and he got on it and made me get banned for no reason. he got on my account and started vandalizing pages. I love wikipedia and being on it. It's a great learning place. I will definiteley remember to change my password and always log off... Im not lying so dont think im lying because im not... this is the truth. The only edits i would make to encyclopedic articles on Wikipedia are good ones. This will never happen again. I know you're just going to ignore but i guess its worth a shot. Deontray hunter (talk) 01:55, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Since April, this account has been used for nothing but vandalism, some of it sufficiently egregious as to require deletion from the page histories. Whether the above is true or not, it is clear that this account is no longer being used for any productive purpose. Compromised accounts are never unblocked, since if you cannot exercise control of your account, we can never be sure who is using it. Yunshui  09:54, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Deontray hunter (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Ok but still i dont want to be blocked from wikipedia! In fact, nobody even cares about me so i dont why i bother trying to get unblocked.... but whatever i guess. just unblock me and i wont do this again. why dont you TRUST me?? i am NEVER in my entire life EVER going to be able to edit on wikipedia ever again.. and i dont think thats fair because i promise i wont actually do it EVER again, if you unblock me. but if you dont unblock me I wont be able to make bad OR good edits. just PLEASE unblock me please. i wont do it anymore.. *sobs* Goodbye forever, world Deontray hunter (talk) 13:56, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Goodbye. OhNoitsJamie Talk 14:59, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Stop hand
Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsabuse filter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If you have already appealed to the Unblock Ticket Request System and been declined you may appeal to the Arbitration Committee's Ban Appeals Subcommittee.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.