User talk:Delta201writer

Delta201writer, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Delta201writer! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Cullen328 (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:02, 13 November 2020 (UTC)

A friendly face appears

Hi Delta, welcome to Wikipedia! About this "Wandering Inn" article, you may want to name or link to the various publications out there: E-books, Audiobooks, Comic. Naturally, as all these are of electronic nature and self-published, you may also want to quote independent literary reviewers. Where I don't think Scarra counts. I guess you are aware of the article on "Worm (web serial)", the only other web novella I am aware of having a wikipedia article already. You might find others in Category:Novels first published online, but so far TWI has not been published offline which is speaking heavily against recognition as a "notable" subject :( Best, --Enyavar (talk) 02:02, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, right, I see on reading more closely again, you linked Worm already, very good. Note that the characters section may be regarded as a starting point of "Fancruft": You arbitrarily selected a few characters from the setting and shortly described them with in-story descriptors. That is not necessary, and once you start to get more detailed than those concise descriptions, the article may devolve into something [like this cruft.] Avoid ever getting in detail like that; I think you should not introduce too many personas or terms from the works at all, and not via lists or tables but in a paragraph from an outside perspective: ("main/pivotal character is...", "support cast are...", "the setting has five continents and many islands, but most of the story takes place in...". Another thing, "the Stabby" is not really a notable award, given that it is awarded after user-voting by respective fanbases, and you may want to clarify who is handing it out (Reddit Fantasy portal, or something?) --Enyavar (talk) 03:02, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Wandering Inn (December 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Spicy was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

None of the sources used in the draft meet Wikipedia's standards for reliability and therefore they cannot demonstrate that the subject is notable. Reference #1 is a Forbes contributor piece: unlike Forbes staff writers, Forbes contributors are essentially bloggers who publish without any editorial oversight. The Fantasy Inn and Fantasy Book Review seem to be amateur blog sites (WP:BLOGS); what Wikipedia looks for when determining the notability of a book is reviews from major, respected outlets such as Publishers Weekly or Kirkus. Finally, Goodreads is user-generated content and not a reliable source.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Wandering Inn and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:The Wandering Inn, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Spicy (talk) 15:44, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:The Wandering Inn

Hello, Delta201writer. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:The Wandering Inn, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:03, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:The Wandering Inn

Hello, Delta201writer. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "The Wandering Inn".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:24, 18 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]