User talk:Daphnaz
October 2006[edit]
You have recently re-created the article BrianQuintana, which was deleted in accordance with Wikipedia's deletion policies. Please do not re-create the article. If you disagree with the article's deletion, you may ask for a deletion review. --Geniac 12:58, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits, such as those you made to Judd Winick, are considered vandalism. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. --Geniac 12:58, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
Please do not remove content from Wikipedia, as you did to Judd Winick. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --Geniac 02:02, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to blank or remove content from Wikipedia, as you did to Pedro Zamora, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Geniac 15:14, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
November 2006[edit]
This is your last warning.
The next time you blank or remove material from a page, as you did to Pedro Zamora, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Geniac 13:43, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
Some of your editing is not vandalism, but on Pedro Zamora you've removed the {{sprotect}}, removed a list of sources and changed one of the categories to a less specific one for no good reason than I can see. If you continue making such changes without explanation you will be blocked. --Sam Blanning(talk) 19:22, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
- I repeat what SB wrote - your recent edit to Pedro Zamora made a quotation innacurate. This is not acceptable behavior. Stop. JBKramer 15:32, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
I warned you and yet you made the same edit again with the same damaging changes I told you should not make. You have been temporarily blocked and if you continue to be unresponsive it will happen again. Please explain your changes ("Stop Corupt Admins" is not an explanation) and be careful about what you edit. --Sam Blanning(talk) 15:34, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
I have also blocked your sockpuppet User:Tonytonyb. Stick to one account - using multiple accounts is not acceptable behaviour. --Sam Blanning(talk) 15:39, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
Please cite[edit]
Your recent contribution(s) to the Wikipedia article Pedro Zamora are very much appreciated. However, you did not provide references or sources for your information. Keeping Wikipedia accurate and verifiable is very important, and as you might be aware there is currently a drive to improve the quality of Wikipedia by encouraging editors to cite the sources they used when adding content. If sources are left unreferenced, it may count as original research, which is not allowed. Can you provide in the article specific references to any books, articles, websites or other reliable sources that will allow people to verify the content in the article? You can use a citation method listed at inline citations that best suits each article. Thanks! --Geniac 14:37, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
December 2006[edit]
A tag has been placed on Brian Quintana, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article is a repost of either already posted material, or of material that was previously deleted under Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion. If you can indicate how Brian Quintana is different from all other articles, or if you can indicate why this article should not be deleted, I advise you to place the template {{hangon}}, and also put a note on Talk:Brian Quintana saying why this article should stay. An admin should check for such edits before deleting the article. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Please read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 4 under General criteria. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. We welcome your help in trying to improve Wikipedia, and we ask you to follow these instructions. --Geniac 14:35, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
STOP RECREATING THE ARTICLE[edit]
You have recently re-created the article BrianQuintana, which was deleted in accordance with Wikipedia's deletion policies. Please do not re-create the article. If you disagree with the article's deletion, you may ask for a deletion review.
It does not matter how many different user names you use. It does not matter how many different titles you use. The proper venue for appealing and overturning deletions is Wikipedia:Deletion Review. DO NOT CREATE THIS AGAIN. Fan-1967 15:33, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
August 2008[edit]
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Pedro Zamora, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Pedro Zamora was changed by Daphnaz (u) (t) deleting 8591 characters on 2008-08-11T08:34:14+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 08:34, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
April 2009[edit]
{{unblock|Your reason here}} below. Geniac (talk) 00:30, 25 April 2009 (UTC) | Blocked as a sockpuppet You have been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet of a banned or blocked user. Blocked or banned users are not allowed to edit Wikipedia; if you are banned, all edits under this account may be reverted. Details of how to appeal a block can be found at: Wikipedia:Appealing a block. |