Jump to content

User talk:DanielLevitin

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome

[edit]

Hello, DanielLevitin, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thanks for your contributions. I hope you like it here and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you will enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! You can sign your name on talk and voting pages using four tildes, (~~~~), which produces your username, the time, and the date. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump, or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! -- getcrunkjuicecontribs 23:58, 30 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Close to You: Remembering the Carpenters

[edit]

Hi, I recognized your name (and photo) from the Close to You: Remembering the Carpenters DVD. I think you explained the Carpenters' image very accurately. I think you said that Richard was wearing a cashmere jacket and Karen wears a lacey dress and it's just too cute. Was the "Close to You" LP you were holding never before opened? It looked like it. 24.25.250.158 07:13, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes it was. DanielLevitin 20:38, 26 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Daniel Levitin.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Daniel Levitin.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 21:43, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

[edit]

Unspecified source for Image:Lloyd Levitin.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Lloyd Levitin.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 15:10, 11 July 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? --MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner) 15:10, 11 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

SP

[edit]

Daniel, there are numerous factual errors in your artice on SP

  1. In fact, it was Pearlman who first coined the term "heavy metal" for music in his 1968 review of The Byrd's "Artificial Energy"in Crawdaddy magazine.
    • term does not appear in his 1968 article
  2. Steppenwolf picked up the phrase ("heavy metal thunder") in "Born To Be Wild" eight months later.
    • album was released Jan 1968 - same month as Byrds
  3. Around the same time, as a student at the State University of New York at Stony Brook, he saw a campus group named The Soft White Underbelly, told them they were great, and named them Blue Öyster Cult, making them the first band to use an umlaut...
    • Pearlman was not a student at SUNY after June 1966. He was on campus from time to time
    • He named them "Soft White Underbelly" - a name he had already discussed aloud before June 1966
    • I don't think he takes credit for the umlaut

Wikipedia is not a fan site, nor a place for hagiography. If we are going to mention his claim re "heavy metal", WP:NPOV requires we mention that the claim is contested --JimWae (talk) 03:01, 27 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]


JimWae: Why do you call it my article? Yo'ure the one who created the SP entry on WP! I apologize for any factual errors I may have inadvertently contributed there or elsewhere. I obtained my information from interviews contemporaries of SP, such as Ricky Meltzer, Howie Klein, Paul Williams, Ben Fong-Torres, as well as bandmembers of BOC. I think this is simply a case where different people have memories that diverge from one another. When you say, for example, that SP had "discussed aloud" the name "Soft White Underbelly" prior to 1966, you're relying on someone's aural memory, as was I in my account of things. Without contemporary-to-the-time written documentation, it's hard to know what's true, isn't it? DanielLevitin (talk) 13:14, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I was referring to this article (which seems to be by you). Re SWU, I was pointing out that it was SP who gave them the SWU name - not that we include SP's earlier mention of it (Sep 67 at latest - I went to Calif then). --JimWae (talk) 17:33, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Ah, true, that article from the Billboard Encylopedia was written by me, and fact-check by the Billboard staff. I didn't know that there were errors in it, not sure how to evaluate the competing claims. DanielLevitin (talk) 21:36, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I brought errors up only because you had introduced it as a source for the WP article - --JimWae (talk) 21:53, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Erdos Number

[edit]

It's not that the number and phenomenon doesn't exist, it's just that I do not see any educational or encyclopedic value to listing it beyond mild trivia; the Wikipedia article your linked me to (which I had already visited) says as much: it was created as a sort of joke, and its propagation seems to be like a joke. I only watch a limited number of biographies at Wikipedia: yours is one of them. If the number showed up on Hildegard of Bingen's article (another one I watch), you can bet I'd support its removal there, too. Or do you expect me to single-handedly comb through each and every one of the tens of thousands of biographies at Wikipedia and remove it from all of them? The Jade Knight (talk) 01:34, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You seem to be implying that it is somehow policy that such information be included. As this appears to be nothing more than an amusing bit of trivia which is entirely unrelated to your work or significance, I really don't see any reason to include it. The Jade Knight (talk) 01:17, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Gian-Carlo Rota

[edit]

Concerning this edit: How do you know he was reading when he died? Is there some indication somewhere of what he was reading? For that matter, I wonder how people know when he died? He was seen on campus Friday afternoon by many people, and Monday morning he was found dead in his residence. How does anyone know the exact date of death if he died alone there. Michael Hardy (talk) 07:34, 23 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Merge discussion for Music and the brain

[edit]

An article that you have been involved in editing, Music and the brain, has been proposed for a merge with another article. If you are interested in the merge discussion, please participate by going here, and adding your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. Morton Shumway—talk 21:35, 25 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]


[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as 415 Records, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to contain material copied from http://www.psych.mcgill.ca/levitin/415.html, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:415 Records saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing!

[edit]

It's not clear whether you are the original submitter or not, of the copied information from your website, however, please do come and participate in the discussion at Copyright Problems Investigation and it will surely be resolved, once and for all. Thanks much. duff 09:35, 26 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Duff, thanks for notifying me of this oversight. I've taken corrective action. DanielLevitin 15:23, 26 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

New article about The Automatt

[edit]

I wrote an article about The Automatt and I used a bit of material from an interview of you, and also a bit from your book. Please tell me if there are errors of commission or omission. Binksternet (talk) 14:50, 26 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:The Organized Mind.jpg

[edit]
⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The Organized Mind.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 14:50, 20 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I uploaded that one in error; there is a replacement that is currently being used. This one should be deleted (but I don't know how). DanielLevitin (talk) 15:27, 20 September 2014 (UTC) 15:24, 20 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Michael Brook, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Into The Wild. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 1 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

[edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:54, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks ... in a roundabout way

[edit]

Hi Daniel, thanks for your edit to Joni Mitchell. I didn't know you edited Wikipedia! I'd recognized your name from various articles and videos and other things about the way the brain processes music. I went and googled Daniel Levitin+Joni Mitchell and found this article of yours about her. I found Mitchell's description of the genesis of her song "Furry Sings the Blues" (my very favourite song from my very favourite album!) so intriguing that I tried to add it to the article about the Hejira album where it's from which I did very badly ... which led me to spend several hours expanding the article to add notes about all the tracks on Hejira. So ... thanks for that, lol!

While I'm here, do you happen to know where I could find a better source for the claim that Jaco Pastorius' contributions were overdubbed to replace other bass parts? That idea seems intriguing to me. Graham87 14:12, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Graham. I hadn't heard that claim and I'm not sure where you'd be able to confirm it. I'll let you know if I turn anything up. DanielLevitin (talk) 15:20, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

[edit]

Hello, DanielLevitin. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, DanielLevitin. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

WP:V

[edit]

I reverted your edit at Anne Treisman. We really need a citation to claim someone is dead. Chris Troutman (talk) 02:23, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I heard it from her husband by email. I imagine there will be an obit tomorrow. If so, I'll cite it. Sorry about that. Does a FB post count as a citation?  :)

Facebook fails WP:SPS. Let's wait for the obit. Thanks for your patience. Chris Troutman (talk) 02:30, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Scott William Winters, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Americans (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:27, 14 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, DanielLevitin. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, DanielLevitin. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:DanielLevitin&oldid=1141231726"