User talk:Dalenoble

Welcome!

Hello, Dalenoble, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Nuclear Time Unit (disambiguation), may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Singularity42 (talk) 02:47, 14 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Nuclear Time Unit (disambiguation)[edit]

The article Nuclear Time Unit (disambiguation) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unnecessary disambiguation page.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Singularity42 (talk) 02:47, 14 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, Common Sense (No Such Thing)[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I notice that you recently created a new page, Common Sense (No Such Thing). First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page - Common sense. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Common sense - you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think that the article you created should remain separate, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Gurt Posh (talk) 19:14, 7 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Nuclear Time Unit for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nuclear Time Unit is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nuclear Time Unit until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Kinu ^t/_c 19:27, 7 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Nuclear Time Unit[edit]

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Nuclear Time Unit, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Kinu ^t/_c 20:08, 7 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

August 2011[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Common sense. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Kinu ^t/_c 20:20, 7 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, then you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Click here to contest this speedy deletion and appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. Kinu ^t/_c 20:25, 7 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from pages that you have created yourself. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Kinu ^t/_c 20:29, 7 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Re: HELP I am being staked by User:Kinu[edit]

Hello, Dalenoble. You have new messages at Singularity42's talk page.
Message added Singularity42 (talk) 21:56, 7 August 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Issues regarding original research[edit]

Hi Dale! I've been reviewing your contribution history, and I wanted to point you to Wikipedia's policies on Wikipedia:No original research, Wikipedia:Notability, and Wikipedia:Reliable sources. Essentially, for an article to exist on a subject (a person, a place, a word, a number, an event, an organization, a product, an equation, etc.), it must meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines. Generally, a subject is notable if it has been reviewed or commented on in a non-trivial way by mulitple, third-party, reliable sources. A self-published source is not a reliable source (this includes sites that anyone can post to). Finally, Wikipedia does not allow original research. That means that you cannot write about (either by creating articles or adding to other articles) ideas or concepts that you are posting from your own original research or ideas. It has to be properly cited to reliable sources (again, not self-published sources).

I hope this makes sense. Let me know if you have any questions after reading the policies. Singularity42 (talk) 22:30, 7 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks and Goodby[edit]

Attempting to make contribution to this arena has proven to be much more interesting process than I had expected. Sorry to have caused problems. I can’t find how to delete my login. Please delete it for me.