User talk:DKalkin

This user may have left Wikipedia. DKalkin has not edited Wikipedia since 16 March 2022. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

This is DKalkin's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue XI - January 2007

The January 2007 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 20:29, 23 January 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Medea-benjamin.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Medea-benjamin.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you.

By the way, it's now orphaned because I got my own photo of Medea Benjamin, now on Commons under CC-BY-SA-2.5. SchuminWeb (Talk) 02:59, 25 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WP:MILHIST Coordinator Elections

The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process is starting. We are looking to elect seven coordinators to serve for the next six months; if you are interested in running, please sign up here by February 11!

Delivered by grafikbot 11:00, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Military History elections

The Military history WikiProject coordinator election has begun. We will be selecting seven coordinators to serve for the next six months from a pool of sixteen candidates. Please vote here by February 25!

Delivered by grafikbot 14:18, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue XII - February 2007

The February 2007 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

Delivered by grafikbot 15:31, 1 March 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Campus Antiwar Network

Would it be possible for you to update the CAN article, it is over a year old and many of my friends have been curious about recent activities

Delivered by Mepheston 17:13, 7 March 2007 (UTC) [reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue XIII - March 2007

The March 2007 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 19:18, 30 March 2007 (UTC) [reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue XIV (April 2007)

The April 2007 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 14:16, 6 May 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Article up for AfD

You may be interested: David MacMichael one of the Veterans for sanity is up for deletion. 68.91.252.148 18:34, 29 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue XV (May 2007)

The May 2007 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 15:07, 9 June 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Assistance with page

Can you please assist with American Empire it is terrible now--a bloated relic of a once really good article. 68.91.253.194 05:16, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue XVI (June 2007)

The June 2007 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 14:08, 8 July 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Can az ewf london.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Can az ewf london.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 14:31, 9 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:You-can't-be-all-that-you-can-be-if-you're-dead.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:You-can't-be-all-that-you-can-be-if-you're-dead.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 03:12, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

International Socialist Organization financial information

DKalkin,

Thank you for your patience with the recent edits I made to the International Socialist Organization entry. I have now provided links to the CERSC website as well as the 2006 IRS 990 tax form for the organization.

I believe this information to be highly relevant as the ISO tries to obscure this publicly available information from its critics (opponents on both the left and the right of the political spectrum) as well as its own members. As a former member for over two years I can attest to this. The Center repeatedly denied my requests for financial information as a dues paying member of the ISO and it only recently came to my attention that this is publicly available information.

People have a right to know where an organization that claims to represent the working class attains its funding. Mercifully, I have not highlighted the hypocrisy inherent in its source of funding, but the organization has published articles in the past that have been critical of Philip Morris among other corporations, yet they continue to invest in this firm.

This is also information that should be made available to party members who are continually called upon to sell literature on behalf of the organization, which generates a great deal of revenue for the Center, but are not paid for their efforts. Instead, a select few party organizers profit, as I have outlined in my proposed edits. Members of the ISO are also pressured (on pain of ostracism or even expulsion from branch meetings) into paying 10% of their total income to the Center in the form of membership dues.

I feel that we would be doing both opponents and members of the ISO a tremendous service by allowing a section on financial information to exist in the Wikipedia entry. I have put forth no criticism or propaganda in my edits, only a few basic facts. The way to a clear view of any political organization's true nature is often found by following the money trail. Imagine, for instance, an entry on Hillary Clinton's presidential campaign that made no mention of campaign finance matters or funding. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sysoctopus (talk • contribs) 01:18, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've responded regarding the Wikipedia article on the International Socialist Organization talk page. Here I just want to add a few comments regarding the off-line issues you raise.

The ISO has a policy of need-to-know with regard to detailed financial and membership information for security reasons. It is, after all, a self-described revolutionary organization, so I'm not sure why this is surprising.
Philip Morris is an ugly corporation, even uglier than the average, but I'm not sure what a better option for the ISO was once offered a donation in its stock. Refuse the desperately-needed funding to maintain its moral purity?
A substantial portion of ISO revenue goes to pay a "select few" organizers because those organizers work full-time for the ISO and require some source of income. I know some of these people; they're not living large. They're working a lot more than 40 hours a week for a cause they believe in.
I have never experienced anything like the threat of ostracism or expulsion from meetings regarding dues - and I do not pay 10% of my income. Nor have I seen this pressure applied to anyone else.
The ISO is not so foolishly arrogant as to claim to 'represent' the working class. It is not a vanguard party; it merely attempts to play a part in building the foundation for a party which can genuinely claim to represent the vanguard of the class.

Kalkin (talk) 04:49, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dkalkin:

I appreciate your attempts at objectivity as well as your willingness to admit a vested interest due to the fact that you are actually a party member. It sounds as if your experiences with party leadership have either been nonexistent or directly opposite to my own.

While your apparent honesty strikes me as noble, and I feel certain you are a decent enough fellow, I must express skepticism over the prospect of any ISO member, regardless of her/his amount of ethical fiber, being allowed to supervise this entry. That's like hiring Winona Rider as head of store security, giving Dracula keys to the blood bank, or appointing Henry Kissinger chair of the 9/11 Commission. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sysoctopus (talk • contribs) 05:23, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edits to Rashid Khalidi wiki

Thank you making those edits to the Rashid Khalidi wiki. I've tried to make some edits earlier about those "criticisms", but other members started to send me warning messages about NPOV. Being new to the wiki system I got a little nervous about any possible ramifications so I tried to "tiptoe" around the subject. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.73.230.150 (talk) 23:50, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Runtshit

Thank you for your message of solidarity. The attacks have been going on for 18 months now, in which time Runtshit and his various avatars have made well over 2500 malicious edits to more than 400 Wikipedia articles, using (so far) 461 different IDs. The background is actually hostility not towards Marxism, but towards anti-Zionism. I am a relatively high-profile anti-Zionist Jew, and the person identifired as "Runtshit" (though his first non-IP edit was apparently in the name of "Fumigate") has taken strong exception to this. Most of his vandalism is directed at articles on the Middle East, rather than on Trotskyism. As well as the Runtshit vandalism, he seems to operate as Truthprofessor to defend Steven Plaut, a far-right business studies lecturer in Israel with a history of libels against anti-Zionists; as Borisyy to attack Neve Gordon, an Israeli left-wing academic who has won a libel action against Plaut, and as Zuminous to arrack Barry Chamish, an even further-right Israeli writer and conspiracy theorist who has a long-standing feud with Plaut. Since the edits appear to be made using an anonynmiser to access proxy services, Wikipedia seems to be powerless to prevent these attacks.

The references to "Tony" would appear to be a reference to my friend and comrade Tony Greenstein, with the implication that I operate under his control and need him to dictate my every move and thought. Nothing could be further from the truth, as he and countless others would confirm. RolandR (talk) 21:06, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oy. 18 months - this is a person with some real problems. It sounds like only real-world exposure would avail to stop this - I'd say this behavior for this period of time justifies violation of anonymity, but for better or worse we don't have that ability.

I spend a fair amount of time myself defending articles like Joseph Massad, Nadia Abu El Haj, and Rashid Khalidi from WP:BLP violations by particularly unscrupulous Zionists. I'm glad none of them appears to have attracted this character's attention!

Kalkin (talk) 22:05, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

He's clearly stalking me, and most articles I edit attract his attention very soon. I haven't so far edited any of these, so it's unlikely that he will attack them; but look at the history of, for instance, Uri Davis, Norman Finkelstein or Uri Avnery to see this character at work. RolandR (talk) 23:19, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Neutrality and sourcing

You selectively removed the critical reviews from the Facts onthe Ground page, so I looked at your contributions to see who you are and there you were, taking the word "liberal" off Leon Wieseltier's page with the snide remark. "remove unsourced and doubtful description". A fair-minded editor would have put ou one of those {citation needed} tags. a truly generous one would go and find the citation. Fan613 (talk) 20:20, 30 April 2008 (UTC)Fan613[reply]

Forgive my assumption. However, you took down Jacob Lassner's review, Lassner is a major scholar of Islam, at Northwestern University, writing in an academic journal the Middle East Quarterly, which is political, but well-regarded. The thing is you did not take down the review from the MIT Electronic Journal of Middle East Studies. You do know that Abu el Haj is on the board of directors of this journal, yes? And that it is probably more partisan and, certainly, less respected than the Middle East Quarterly. Quite objectively so in terms of the calibre of scholars who write for it. That is, while everyone writing for the Middle East Quarterly believes in the right of Israel to exist and, as far as I can tell in a brief perusal, everyone writing for the MIT Electronic Journal of Middle East Studies denies that Israel has that right, the MEQ regularly published well-established scholars like Lassner, while MIT Electronic Journal of Middle East Studies self-describes as a venue for young scholars. Moreover, you did not take down the H-net review. H-net is an idea that, a few discussion groups excepted, has not worke out. Even at its peak, however, the reviewers were (and largely still are) graduate students. Not scholars of Lassner's stature, although they may be so someday. 160.39.35.14 (talk) 21:06, 30 April 2008 (UTC)Fan613[reply]

I know basically nothing about either H-Net or the MIT Electronic Journal of Middle East Studies, though I believe the latter's apparent association with MIT gives it some default credibility. MEQ is published by the Middle East Forum, the openly partisan think tank run by Daniel Pipes (a rather hysterical and credulous figure), and I do not believe it is well regarded among scholars who do not share Pipes' politics. I would rather remove all three reviews than keep all three, though I would like more reason to believe the MIT publication is not a genuine academic journal before barring it, perhaps an off-Wikipedia source on the subject. Kalkin (talk) 21:15, 30 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Copyvio

Please see diff, unless I am missing something it looks like a short quote of a person is the potential copyvio, these are generally allowed. If I am missing something, please point me to the specific text you believe is copyvio. Jeepday (talk) 02:00, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the clarification - reviewed at Talk:Ica stones, let me know if missed anything else. Jeepday (talk) 11:47, 3 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Blog on Khalidi

Hi. In general, I would agree with you that Martin Kramer's blog is included in the exception in WP:RS, and should be allowed, and I actually restored the material. However, while double-checking the appropriate policies and guidelines, as they are currently formulated, there is a rider in both WP:RS and WP:V that prohibits self-published, third-party sources from being used in any biographical article, so I was forced to revert myself and I believe the Kramer reference is not allowed under current guidelines. I've made a note of this on Talk:Rashid Khalidi with wikilinks to the pertinent guidelines. Thank you. -- Avi (talk) 23:33, 11 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion review for March 19, 2008 anti-war protest

An editor has asked for a deletion review of March 19, 2008 anti-war protest. Since you closed the deletion discussion for this article, speedy-deleted it, or were otherwise interested in the article, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Myheartinchile (talk) 18:56, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Daniel Pipes

I see your point, although I do believe his work to suggest Obama was a Muslim and had an association with Khalidi (whom he argues was employed by a terrorist organization) merits a separate paragraph or section. I'll see if I can find reliable sources that suggest that the notability of this perspective warrants that. Ghalibshah (talk) 16:32, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Can banner.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Can banner.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:13, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Can dc sept 24.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Can dc sept 24.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:14, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Can third nat conference.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Can third nat conference.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:14, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Dave airhart on wall.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Dave airhart on wall.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:17, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image permission problem with Image:Counter-recruitment.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Counter-recruitment.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the image (or other media file) agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the GFDL or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to [email protected], stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the image to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the image has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to [email protected].

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the image's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Images lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Jay32183 (talk) 06:57, 15 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Ehren Watada

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Ehren Watada. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ehren Watada (2nd nomination). Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:07, 1 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Ashley Smith (journalist)

I have nominated Ashley Smith (journalist), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ashley Smith (journalist). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Cerejota (talk) 23:01, 21 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

International Socialist Organization page vandalism

Hi - I was hoping to ask for your guidance. I'm a member of the ISO, and our page has recently been vandalized with the posting of erroneous financial information (similar to information you've deleted/had discussions about in the past.) We've since deleted the information and are hoping to make sure this doesn't become a constant back-and-forth.

We'd like to keep the page accurate, free of distortions (without turning it into some kind of ad--that's not our intention). I was wondering if you have any tips for dealing with this kind of vandalism, if there's anything we should know about the process, etc.

Any tips you can offer would be appreciated, thanks! Nicole.colson (talk) 06:24, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Sharon Smith (writer)

The article Sharon Smith (writer) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:GNG WP:SELF WP:SPIP WP:LINKFARM WP:RS

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. PeterWesco (talk) 03:51, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Military history coordinator election

Greetings from WikiProject Military history! As a member of the project, you are invited to take part in our annual project coordinator election, which will determine our coordinators for the next twelve months. If you wish to cast a vote, please do so on the election page by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September! Ed ^{[talk] [majestic titan]} 22:15, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ahmed Shawki (socialist) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ahmed Shawki (socialist) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Articles for deletion/Ahmed Shawki (socialist) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.E.M.Gregory (talk) 10:42, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Military history coordinator election

Greetings from WikiProject Military history! As a member of the project, you are invited to take part in our annual project coordinator election. If you wish to cast a vote, please do so on the election page by 23:59 (UTC) on 29 September. Yours, Ed ^{[talk] [majestic titan]} 05:21, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of plagiarism incidents for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of plagiarism incidents is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of plagiarism incidents until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Brustopher (talk) 16:39, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User group for Military Historians

Greetings,

"Military history" is one of the most important subjects when speak of sum of all human knowledge. To support contributors interested in the area over various language Wikipedias, we intend to form a user group. It also provides a platform to share the best practices between military historians, and various military related projects on Wikipedias. An initial discussion was has been done between the coordinators and members of WikiProject Military History on English Wikipedia. Now this discussion has been taken to Meta-Wiki. Contributors intrested in the area of military history are requested to share their feedback and give suggestions at Talk:Discussion to incubate a user group for Wikipedia Military Historians.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:30, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Invite

I see you have self-identified as a backpacker by using the ”This user enjoys backpacking” user box. I invite you to join the backpacking project. The project recently reactivated. There is plenty of good work to do improving the encyclopedia’s coverage of backpacking equipment, organizations, celebrities, books, skills, and trails. The project provides a system to rate articles and prioritize editing efforts. Visit the project’s page, take a look, and please consider joining me in improving the articles and coverage of an activity we both enjoy.

You're invited to be a part of WikiProject Backpacking, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to backpacking. To accept this invitation, click here!

—¿philoserf? (talk) 21:54, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Poverty draft" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Poverty draft. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 July 1#Poverty draft until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. UnitedStatesian (talk) 06:31, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

April 2021 WikiProject Military History Reviewing Drive

Hey y'all, the April 2021 WikiProject Military History Reviewing Drive begins at 00:01 UTC on April 1, 2021 and runs through 23:59 UTC on April 31, 2021. Points can be earned through reviewing articles on the AutoCheck report, reviewing articles listed at WP:MILHIST/ASSESS, reviewing MILHIST-tagged articles at WP:GAN or WP:FAC, and reviewing articles submitted at WP:MILHIST/ACR. Service awards and barnstars are given for set points thresholds, and the top three finishers will receive further awards. To participate, sign up at Wikipedia:WikiProject_Military_History/April 2021 Reviewing Drive#Participants and create a worklist at Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/April 2021 Reviewing Drive/Worklists (examples are given). Further details can be found at the drive page. Questions can be asked at the drive talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:28, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

April 2021 WikiProject Military History Reviewing Drive

Hey y'all, the April 2021 WikiProject Military History Reviewing Drive begins at 00:01 UTC on April 1, 2021 and runs through 23:59 UTC on April 31, 2021. Points can be earned through reviewing articles on the AutoCheck report, reviewing articles listed at WP:MILHIST/ASSESS, reviewing MILHIST-tagged articles at WP:GAN or WP:FAC, and reviewing articles submitted at WP:MILHIST/ACR. Service awards and barnstars are given for set points thresholds, and the top three finishers will receive further awards. To participate, sign up at Wikipedia:WikiProject_Military_History/April 2021 Reviewing Drive#Participants and create a worklist at Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/April 2021 Reviewing Drive/Worklists (examples are given). Further details can be found at the drive page. Questions can be asked at the drive talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:09, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nominations opening soon

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are opening in a few hours (00:01 UTC on 1 September). A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:51, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election voting opening soon!

Voting for the upcoming project coordinator election opens in a few hours (00:01 UTC on 15 September) and will last through 23:59 on 28 September. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. Voting is conducted using simple approval voting and questions for the candidates are welcome. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:26, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Correction to previous election announcement

Just a quick correction to the prior message about the 2022 MILHIST coordinator election! I (Hog Farm) didn't proofread the message well enough and left out a link to the election page itself in this message. The voting will occur here; sorry about the need for a second message and the inadvertent omission from the prior one. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:40, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election voting closing soon

Voting for the upcoming project coordinator election closes soon, at 23:59 on 28 September. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. Voting is conducted using simple approval voting and questions for the candidates are welcome. The voting itself is occurring here If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:13, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template

Please remove the template at the top of the page if you return to editing. Thanks. Donner60 (talk) 03:33, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]